Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
Regarding the March 21 Mountain Democrat article “Supes Scotch Development Agreement Team,”
Sea change? Turning of tides? Time will tell. But the good news is that the BOS did listen to public opposition on March 18, and said no to jumpstarting developer projects before they’ve been publicly introduced. They then voted to develop a “framework” that will combine the board, staff and the public to redefine “Development Agreements” as “County Benefit Agreements.”
Words mean a lot: Replacing “county benefit” for “development” suggests that the public is now viewed as having an equal voice in determining land use planning outcomes.
The county’s Economic Development Advisory Committee should take warning. As should supervisory candidates running on EDAC’s agenda. At the end of the day, the question that will be asked of EDAC, of the developer’s new initiative and of supervisory candidates, “Will your actions stop the development of large subdivisions, protect water resources and prevent further gridlock on Highway 50 and county roadways?”
If not, then your agenda will be rejected for failing to truly provide sustainable county benefits.
El Dorado Hills