Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
The letter written by George Alger on Oct. 2 about Obamacare appears to be confused when comparing government employees to “rank-and-file Americans” concerning health insurance. For example, I work for a private company that pays for my health insurance. In other words, my employer “subsidizes” my health insurance as part of my employment benefits package. If my employer suddenly announced that they would no longer pay for my health insurance, my displeasure would not indicate that I do not like the health insurance plan, but that I instead do not like my total compensation package being reduced.
Congressional employees have their health insurance paid for by their employer, which is the government, as part of their total employment compensation package. If the government no longer paid (or subsidized) the health insurance of those employees, their total compensation package would be lowered considerably. Just as I would be upset if my employer suddenly no longer paid for my health insurance, Congressional workers are also against their employer (the government) eliminating payment for their health insurance. This does not mean they do not like Obamacare. Instead, it means that they are against being paid less for the same amount of work.
In other words, eliminating government health-insurance subsidies for U. S. Government employees is not the same as not providing subsidies for health insurance for private employees. This is an apple and oranges comparison that does not stand up to the light of day.