Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
I picked up my copy of Friday’s (Nov. 9) edition, and lo and behold, there were nice big bold headlines on the front page of the winners of candidates supported by the Mountain Democrat, but not one single bold headline reporting the results of the election of the President of the United States. If you read the column regarding the fact that the local voters remained conservative, then you got the figures for the Presidential election. However, they were skewered by the fact that the El Dorado County residents supported the eventual runner-up. This is certainly not surprising considering the policy and leaning of the Mountain Democrat. However, would it have been too painful to at least report that there was a winner of the election for President? Perhaps you should change the name of the paper to the “Mountain Republican.” It would certainly be more fitting.