Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
When one reviews the timeline of what occurred after the EID general manager proposed a developer hook-up fee hike to better help cover EID’s mounting debt costs, then, after “negotiations,” that proposed fee is later cut by $7,000, one has to ask “why?”
When a major developer shovels that much money into a local election in support of two specific candidates, one naturally has to ask “why?”
When a Sacramento TV news station airs a report questioning the propriety of the return address of said mailing — from a PAC calling itself everything under the sun except “developer,” one surely has to ask “why?”
“Selling out to developers?” Nope, it’s a lot more than “just a slogan;” it’s a legitimate question. Now, calling a candidate “50 shades of fool?” That’s a slogan — and a silly one at that.
El Dorado Hills