Wednesday, April 23, 2014
PLACERVILLE, CALIFORNIA
99 CENTS

Garon’s lion’s den

EDITOR:

Well here we have it, the umpteenth letter from Mr. Garon on how guns should be banned. It’s easy to understand Mr. Garon when you realize where he’s coming from. He has a Euro-socialist perspective. Unlike our Founding Fathers he doesn’t believe that the people can or should be trusted with rights such as the Second Amendment, which could prove to be dangerous — while the Founding Fathers viewed government as being there to provide just basic services like defense, roads, etc. as a servant of the people.

Mr. Garon has the Euro-socialist view that sees government as a parent that gives its children, the people, only those rights that it deems safe for them to possess. As good parents he sees government’s role to nurture and care for its children, keep them safe and deny them any rights that it believes the exercise of which could be dangerous. Just like at the time of the Revolution, European thinkers such as Mr. Garon view a free people as the Founding Fathers viewed freedom as a dangerous people. In fact I doubt that Mr. Garon could come up with what he considers a good reason for the American Revolution. He probably thinks that England was moving toward more automomy for the Colonies and that the other rights that motivated the patriots of the day, such as regarding arms, are ones that the people should never have been granted in the first place.

So if you want to be a child taken care of and kept from dangerous things by your governmental parent, Mr. Garon will gladly state your case. If, however, you would like to spend the one life you are given as captain of your own ship for better or worse, then Mr. Garon will not be your source of inspiration.

GEORGE ALGER
Placerville

Letters to the Editor

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 67 comments

  • boozyMarch 27, 2013 - 12:22 pm

    Could not have said it better myself. We as Patriot Americans are being hit from all sides. While we were "asleep" trying to raise a family, feed that family and make a good life for that family, Socialist such as this have slimed into every facit of government, schools, colleges, both houses of government along with the Big Kahuna position in the Oval Office. As Constitution loving, patriotic Americans we are obligated to rid our country of these creatures. They are not in any fashion or form looking out for the American people or the Founding Fathers wishes, they are here for one purpose only, Destroy America.... Boozy

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James E.March 27, 2013 - 1:23 pm

    Well, Mr. Alger certainly knows about umpteenth letters (usually about austerity being the only solution even if it causes the death of the nation). Here, he postulates about Mr. Garon's thought processes when there is no way he could, in fact, know them. It makes me wonder if Mr. Alger is that old guy who tells Jack to get off his lawn while spraying him with his hose in the Jack In The Box commericals? As in, Mr. Garon get OFF my Tea Party lawn.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Dink LaneMarch 27, 2013 - 3:44 pm

    A U.S. Soldier has to get a background check to even get in the Army, and that is before he get his rifle--and then TRAINING. AZ shooter, Loughner, was BLOCKED from joining the Army because he couldn't pass the background check...... Yet, we turn around and sell him multiple guns -- guns that the Army knew he shouldn't have had...... Mr. Alger, you say this is about the 2nd AMENDMENT.... I differ with you. .... If you read the 2nd Amendment PLUS the Constitution's Article I, Section 8, Paragraphs 15 & 16... You will see that "militia" is a reference to "Protecting the Union." Even Heller v. D.C. refers to RESPONSIBILITY to the country -- Not to a U.S. Army REJECT'S right to go UNCHECKED.....

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • DarrinMarch 30, 2013 - 9:06 am

    Ha, those horrible Euro countries with their Euro-socialist perspective. Everyone of which has a higher life expectancy than that of the US(40th. Maybe the gun-toting, fat, American is dying off... The gun nuts have proven that they can not control themselves. It is time for society to dictate who can arm themselves.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • francescaduchamp@att.netMarch 30, 2013 - 9:26 am

    Darrin--better site...I can give you many more...http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/ You were mean...tsk tsk tsk...all countries are having problems--what you need to look at is how they are beating those problems.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynMarch 30, 2013 - 10:06 am

    For reasons that elude me, I post THIS here.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynMarch 30, 2013 - 10:13 am

    "Obama Signs Executive Order to Bolster Gun Registry" - HERE

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 01, 2013 - 6:20 am

    For people like garon, bondage is far less strenuous than liberty. "Liberty is always dangerous, but it is the safest thing we have." ~Harry Emerson Fosdick/

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 01, 2013 - 6:31 am

    Bondage is effortless, liberty is strenuous. It truly is a question of intellect. For some happiness is the government restricting those who excel so they can feel better about being losers. If freedom is too much of a burden for them it is too much of a burden for everyone else. The first lie of leftism: we can make everyone equal.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Ken SteersApril 01, 2013 - 6:54 am

    I have to point out that Darrin isn't even a US citizen. Speaking for all fat Americans everywhere. Darrin, I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough wiper. I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries. You don't frighten us, Euro-trash pig dogs. Go and boil your bottoms, you sons of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called Euro-lover you and all your silly European K-nig-hts

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampApril 01, 2013 - 7:49 am

    I think Ken Steers is being April fooled.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 01, 2013 - 7:53 am

    Speaking of April Fools, I've just now read (seriously) that one R.Cheney has passed to a better place, but can't find news wire confirmation.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 01, 2013 - 8:38 am

    Phil, have you ever seen this video on obama's forged selective service registration? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHAM3hRI8_Y

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 01, 2013 - 8:39 am

    Evelyn, where did you read it?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 01, 2013 - 8:47 am

    In garon's America the survivors of Benghazi will never have to tell this country what really happened and who gave the stand down order. Here is how much the left really cares about the children. http://abcnews.go.com/US/2020/georgia-official-charged-obstruction-stroller-shooting-death/story?id=18839500#.UVmq_2zn99A

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Tom GibneyApril 01, 2013 - 8:52 am

    Well, I think the true requirement for Gun owner ship is that you must go into the forest and cut down a tree with a herring, then you must bring back some shrubbery! Here's another point of view... Subject: My Shotgun Today I swung my front door wide open and placed my Remington 1100 semi-automatic shotgun right in the doorway. I gave it 5 shells - 1 for the chamber and 4 for the magazine. Then I noticed that it had no legs, so I placed it in my wheelchair to help it get around. I then left it alone and went about my business. While I was gone, the mailman delivered my mail, the neighbor boy across the street mowed the yard, a girl walked her dog down the street, and quite a few cars stopped at the stop sign right in front of our house. After about an hour, I checked on the gun. It was still sitting there in the wheelchair, right where I had left it. It hadn't rolled itself outside. It certainly hadn't killed anyone, even with the numerous opportunities it had been presented to do so. In fact, it hadn't even loaded itself. Well you can imagine my surprise, with all the liberal media hype about how dangerous guns are and how they kill people. Either the liberal media is wrong, and it's the misuse of guns by PEOPLE that kills people, or I'm in possession of the laziest gun in the world. Well I'm off to check on my spoons. I hear they're making people fat. Author Unknown...

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 01, 2013 - 9:03 am

    Cookie: Still no news, which, if it were true, is most improbable. A link elsewhere brought me HERE

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampApril 01, 2013 - 9:53 am

    Cookie, that post mark thing . . . crazy making . . . pure crazy making. We're stuck. But . . . how about this for a possibly pleasant and pleasing distraction . . . In a little over three hours from now the San Francisco Giants play the Los Angeles Dodgers in the 1st game of 2013 hopefully leading to back-to-back WORLD F'ING CHAMPIONSHIPS. GO GIANTS!!!!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • chrispytahoeApril 01, 2013 - 12:21 pm

    Let us keep our peashooters. Require background checks and registration. Ban fully auto weapons and high capacity clips.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Dink LaneApril 01, 2013 - 2:21 pm

    Gun Ownership under the "Bill of Rights," under the "Articles of Confederation," Under the "Constitution" (Article 1, Section 8, Paragraphs 14 and 15) and under the 2nd Amendment (formerly the Bill of Rights)...... all require..... RESPONSIBILITY..... Responsibility to the "Union." NOT to "Me-myself-and-I."...... It was meant to for all Citizens to think of the Country First..... Something the present "Let the country fail.... I have my guns," Ayn-Rand-libertarians can only think about.....

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 01, 2013 - 2:35 pm

    Dink, this country was built around personal freedom and liberty not the "union". When you are done being a pretzel trying to twist reality here is how those who fought for it defined it. "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government."

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampApril 01, 2013 - 3:04 pm

    Cookie - "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. - - - The barn door is WIDE OPEN here, "promote the general Welfare".

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 01, 2013 - 4:19 pm

    Phil, for years I have been convinced that there are two things taught about the Constitution in our universities of repeat after me. The first of those things is the general welfare clause gives the government permission to do anything it wants. The second is the interstate commerce clause gives the government permission to do anything it wants. Ask any college grad.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Ken SteersApril 01, 2013 - 5:16 pm

    It is a god given right that every man shall posses a royal hand grenade in defense of killer rabbits...And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, "O LORD, bless this Thy hand grenade that with it Thou mayest blow Thine enemies to tiny bits, in Thy mercy." And the LORD did grin and the people did feast upon the lambs and sloths and carp and anchovies and orangutans and breakfast cereals, and fruit bats and large chu... [At this point, the friar is urged by Brother Maynard to "skip a bit, brother"]... And the LORD spake, saying, "First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin, then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who being naughty in My sight, shall snuff it." I just don't want to debate Euro-trash wanna be's, the stinky French or French Canadians for that matter.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 01, 2013 - 9:09 pm

    Ken, Amen to that!!!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampApril 01, 2013 - 9:18 pm

    Thank you, Ken, for my spring epifany

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampApril 01, 2013 - 9:22 pm

    . . . my spring epiphany triggered no doubt by your stirring homily.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James E.April 01, 2013 - 10:58 pm

    Phil, I don't want to nitpick, but if you love the Constitution, you must also love the words provide for the general welfare. Surely, you don't cherry pick and love only the parts you love, while rejecting those you do not? The words provide for the general welfare and resulting consequences are original intent and therefore must have, at minimum, the support of Justice Scalia. Grenades? In movies when they go off it looks like a nuclear explosion. In reality, the explosion is quite small, yet deadly as shards of steel kill those exposed within a certain radius. That was my epiphany, grenades in springtime.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Ken SteersApril 02, 2013 - 7:03 am

    You are most welcome Phil, I think that the "fat American" insult took me to another place. Quite possibly because I find that homily is best served in a spicy posole.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 7:08 am

    Sneering at "the French" (or any other entire group of people) does not constitute a reasoned exchange. But regarding those “stinky French", in the American Revolutionary War they fought alongside the US. "French money, munitions, soldiers and naval forces proved essential to America's victory over the Crown, but France gained little except large debts." (HERE) In school we learned about Lafayette. He was among the French volunteers who joined the American army, enlisting at the age of 20. He became an aide to Washington and a combat general. It is said that Lafayette "provided a legitimacy for the war and confidence that there was serious European support for independence."

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampApril 02, 2013 - 7:31 am

    Ken - - Spicy Posole Soup -

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 7:32 am

    . . . as for those "stinky Mexicans" -- VIVA TIERRA COLORADA! (HERE) -- On March 28, 1,500 armed citizens took to the streets, set up roadblocks, and arrested local officials ... as well as searching homes for known criminals. They have also arrested the former mayor, the chief of police, and 12 officers. The charges: murder, and collusion with criminals.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 7:38 am

    MORE: "The roots of this crisis are firmly planted in Mexico’s long history of centralized control exercised from Mexico City, and particularly in the abrogation of just land titles. These were violated and obscured by feudal land grants during the colonial period, and then further complicated by government land seizures labeled “privatization” which only succeeded in enriching various oligarchs and government officials. Concessions were sold off to mining companies, railroads, and other big ticket industrial cartels, while the indigenous people were driven off their land and herded into the big cities, mostly Mexico City. The lands surrounding the urban center metastasized into giant pockets of poverty."

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 7:51 am

    . . . How about them "stinky Sacramento people"? (spell check rejects "Sacramentens") - HERE

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • francescaduchamp@att.netApril 02, 2013 - 8:05 am

    people (Americans)fighting back-today Ga. city council votes to require gun ownership

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Tom GibneyApril 02, 2013 - 8:22 am

    I want to be called Loretta! ...Well Reg, certainly we can defend your right to have babies now can't we?..... This coming from the Judean Peoples Front...or was it the Peoples Judean Front... Ok, Right then! Started out as a perfectly good argument then it became silly. We'll have no more of that then! Off with the lot of you! .... Quoting Monty Python brings humor to a truly pedantic argument from the left that is getting redundant again.... :).....Say how about that New kid on the Block..Kim Jong un? Reminds me of Cartman from the South Park cartoon...

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James E.April 02, 2013 - 9:11 am

    Phil, sorry. I said I don't want to nitpick and then I proceeded to nitpick. Nevertheless, the general welfare words indicate the Constitution was of the people, and if the Constitution provides for justice and defense, why not some crumbs for the people? Yes, why not?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James E.April 02, 2013 - 9:14 am

    Yes, had it not been for the help of the French in 1776, we would all be speaking proper English.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Ken SteersApril 02, 2013 - 10:22 am

    Tom, Kim Jong is awesome! Important leaders like Bill Clinton, Bill Richardson and Dennis Rodman visit him all the time. I grow tired of making boogeymen out of these little dictators. I have a feeling that either Russia or China will grow tired of and end the blood line of the Kim Jong dynasty. Regarding the Cartman analogy, spot on! But be careful because Cartman was the son of Satan.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Tom GibneyApril 02, 2013 - 10:26 am

    Say wasn't Bill CLinton the one who helped them ease into the Nuclear age...for peaceful purposes of course...That Slick Willy he's a Hoot!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Tom GibneyApril 02, 2013 - 10:31 am

    Say here's a new tidbit Those silly kids in the UN (United Nincompoops) think they can override the US constitution...hmm That will send a tingle up Garon and Dinks' legs :) http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/2/un-passes-international-arms-regulation-treaty/

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Jim RiordanApril 02, 2013 - 10:43 am

    Did someone say Kim Jung dUNg? Where is Seal team six when we really need them? Watching that brain-dead idiot troll standing in front of his goose stepping wind-up dolls with all his flat-brown-hatted morons standing behind him looking down on him makes me laugh. . . Shoot down his cheap Korean Nuke missile and Send him a JDAM for lunch! What a POS!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 10:59 am

    (4/2/2013) "U.N. passes sweeping international arms regulation viewed by some as Second Amendment override" - HERE

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 02, 2013 - 11:31 am

    James, " if the Constitution provides for justice and defense, why not some crumbs for the people? Yes, why not?" See Stockton CA. The natural and unavoidable result of the redistribution of wealth. They have been reaping with sowing for decades.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 02, 2013 - 11:39 am

    James, California is unequalled in crumbs for the people. The sacbee has a story on California's debt. "insolvency with a negative net worth of $127.2 billion." "The report listed the state's long-term obligations at $167.9." "The list of long-term obligations did not include the much-disputed unfunded liabilities for state employees' future pensions, nor the $60-plus billion in unfunded liabilities for retiree health care." We also know that having 1/8 of the nations population California has 1/3 of the nations welfare. But it started out as just some "crumbs" for the people. http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2013/03/state-auditor-california-net-worth-at-negative-127-billion.html#storylink=cpy

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James E.April 02, 2013 - 11:56 am

    Well then, we are agreed then that provide for the general welfare is appropriate for the Constitution. Now, the debate becomes whether crumbs have become large white wedding cakes with butter icing. Could be.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • R.J. CarterApril 02, 2013 - 12:20 pm

    Yup, ..I'm with you Jim R.....It sticks in my craw to see that pudgy little POS standing around pointing at stuff and making threats...Also, whats up with the hundreds of "campaign ribbons" plastered all over the front of his adolescent generals??...I guess since the cease-fire of 1953 they must be handing out "campaign ribbons" for all the parades they go to....And, those big, beautiful "kite-like " hats they wear, must not be a whole lot of wind in North Korea except for what comes out of their leader.....

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Jim RiordanApril 02, 2013 - 12:43 pm

    Yes RJ, . .From both ends . . . that little puke Kim Jong dUNg reminds me of the two-panel cartoon of Moammar Gadhafi, years ago, running down the street rattling a saber shouting "Holy war" and then in the second panel running in the opposite direction, being chased by one of our jets while shouting "Holy Shi ". ...One of the best cartoons ever. Just change the jet to a missile. I volunteer to push the "launch" button . . . All dUNg's real people starve while the brown-hatted butt kissers are the only ones eating.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 02, 2013 - 1:18 pm

    "I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I travelled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." -- Benjamin Franklin

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 1:43 pm

    Cookie: It is worth considering changes over the past 224 years that have impacted upon people's available choices, including the availability of land, the resulting relative greater ease with which people formerly could sustain body, soul and family off the land, and the earlier diminished government interference when doing those things.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Jim RiordanApril 02, 2013 - 2:00 pm

    Hi Cookie, I agree with ya on most everything , just wanted you to know I feel the same as you about government giveaways for sure, but in Kim Jong dUNgs country, the goose stepping jerks are taking from the poor, keeping them down by force, and there is no freedom for them to grow their own products and sell them as there is here.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James E.April 02, 2013 - 2:24 pm

    Reputed that Ben Franklin once came out for Miracle Whip over Mayo. Fact? Fiction? The real story probably lost to history.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 2:28 pm

    Sorry, but Ben preferred Best Foods.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James E.April 02, 2013 - 2:37 pm

    Ben and my wife seem to like the same. I prefer Miracle Whip. Has been a point of contention for many years in our home.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampApril 02, 2013 - 2:49 pm

    James, I have a nasty joke about Miracle Whip. But old guys deserve a few undiminished distractions, so I'll refrain.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 2:51 pm

    Phil, keep out of what clearly is a sensitive family matter. As a neutral party, I rise to support James' wife on this. Best Food rules.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 02, 2013 - 2:51 pm

    Jim, little kimmy is the natural result of unimpeded leftism. When obama's idol chavez assumed room temperature they paraded his coffin thru the slums he left behind where the citizens wait in line for hours hoping to get a little flour. While he left $2billion for his family that he stole from the country. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/03/15/chavez-coffin-parades/1991899/

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampApril 02, 2013 - 2:57 pm

    James, it’s broadly reputed that Ben Franklin was quite the lady’s man. My money is on this Mayo chic – whoever she was.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 02, 2013 - 3:07 pm

    Evelyn, the things that have changed the most over the last 224 years have been the size of government and the confiscation of resources necessary to support it and the power the same government has assumed in interfering with the free market. Wealth is spread by creating more of it, but ever since FDR the government has adopted the theory that wealth is spread by confiscating more of it. And we continue to add more and more able-bodied citizens to the limitations of government crumbs. That is probably the single most frustrating thing for me where welfare is concerned. It is accepting a life of poverty in a nation where they wake up everyday with the same exact freedoms you and I have.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 3:35 pm

    Cookie: In large part I am with you. But though living under the same Constitution, I disagree that it protects all citizens equally -- theory not withstanding. (Thereon lies an extended discussion.) In terms of economic advantage, inherited wealth is a kick start not enjoyed by everyone. Someone once equated this to a marathon, with some runners carrying 100 lb backpacks. The truly exceptional might overcome that disadvantage, but a disadvantage it remains.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 02, 2013 - 3:39 pm

    Who here would consider this an opportunity? Arrange with the federal government to adopt a welfare family on the condition that they no longer get welfare and you never pay federal taxes again and all you have to do is cause them to become self supporting. I would do it so fast it would make your head spin and so would enough other Americans to end welfare. In stead it costs us hundreds of billions every year to produce people with no marketable skills. And half of them can't even communicate with other humans.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Ken SteersApril 02, 2013 - 3:43 pm

    Our country has a "common sense" deficiency. A large portion of our society has eliminated it and has asked government to provide it for them. Like Obama Care for instance. The problem is that those who work for the government were cleansed of any common sense. This is verified by the fact that they work for the government. So look at Obama care, the crowning achievement of socialist everywhere. It's crumbling. http://www.examiner.com/article/obamacare-enactment-being-handled-like-the-keystone-kops All I can do is laugh.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 02, 2013 - 4:08 pm

    Evelyn, we have a social and cultural problem more than we have an inherent wealth problem. If inherent wealth were the problem we would have equal crime rates among all ethnicities and an equal rate of college degrees among all ethnicities. I have said this before and got James all excited, I was born naked, without any education,knowledge, skills, direction, or ambition. I couldn't walk, talk, read, write, speak, ad two plus two or wipe my own *ss. Just like everyone else. And just like everyone else I have made CHOICES along the way. I have learned many things the hard way. I had a couple of things pounded in my head that I have passed along to my own kids. Respect for the private property of others, I am not entitled to what other people earn and the understanding that I can beat 90% of the people just by showing up. Why do people need to make excuses for themselves when we have so many here in America who are more than willing to do it for them.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 4:13 pm

    What label do we apply to the banker bailouts, which as at a year and a half ago reportedly equaled $29 TRILLION? HERE. Some call it socialism for the elites. Whatever, I'll bet a lot of poor people would be far less poor, had it not been for such highway robbery.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 02, 2013 - 4:15 pm

    Cookie: I've got to run and haven't properly considered your last comment. But I had spoken of "inherited" wealth, not "inherent". Practically, the difference is HUGE.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65April 02, 2013 - 4:18 pm

    Would somebody please help me understand why we have so many examples of people who migrate to America with nothing and achieve financial success while at the same time we make excuses for people who were born here spending their entire life on welfare.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynApril 03, 2013 - 7:22 am

    Senate Bill 139: “To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.” - Senators Boxer & Feinstein (CA) voted against.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
.

News

Downtown group coordinates painting, awnings

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: A1

 
More mountain lion sightings reported

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1, 8 Comments

 
Supervisor Nutting trial begins

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1, 69 Comments | Gallery

Sanford murder case to jury

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1 | Gallery

 
Herard over the back fence: Try fishing at Wakamatsu

By Bob Billingsley | From Page: B1

Gearing tax questions to correct office saves time

By Treasurer-Tax Collector | From Page: A3

 
.

Opinion

My turn: More than a buzzword

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A4, 23 Comments

 
Building restored

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4

 
Outstanding dog

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4

.

Letters

‘Parents, be afraid’ letter

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 19 Comments

 
Ukranian situation

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 4 Comments

Misquote

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 8 Comments

 
Altshuler framing

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 8 Comments

National Day of Prayer

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 2 Comments

 
.

Sports

Pedal power at the forefront next month

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A6 | Gallery

 
Outside with Charlie: Transitioning

By Charlie Ferris | From Page: A6

Pitching the ‘Root’ cause of Trojans’ victory

By Mike Bush | From Page: A6 | Gallery

 
Sports Scene: April 22, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A7

Roundup: April 22, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A7

 
.

Prospecting

4-H’ers star at showcase

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: B1 | Gallery

 
At a glance: Look for fireballs

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2, 1 Comment

Authors to share their stories

By Pat Lakey | From Page: B2, 2 Comments

 
Church to host human trafficking conference

By Pollock Pines | From Page: B3

Grow For It! Flower of Easter

By Barbara Schuchart | From Page: B5

 
.

Essentials

Crime Log: April 1-3

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

 
Weather stats 4-22-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2

Building permits 4/7-11/2014

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2

 
.

Obituaries

Bobby Lloyd Bridges

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
Harry Frank Harper

By Contributor | From Page: A2, 6 Comments

Marion “Wayne” Griswold

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
.

Real Estate

.

Comics

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A8

 
Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A8

 
Tundra

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Horoscope, Thursday, April 24, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A8

 
Horoscope, Wednesday, April 23, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A8

 
TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Shoe

By Contributor | From Page: A8

 
Sudoku

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Rubes

By Contributor | From Page: A8