Friday, April 25, 2014
PLACERVILLE, CALIFORNIA
99 CENTS

Irony

EDITOR:

Listen up, class, today’s subject is irony.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture is proud to be distributing, this year, the greatest amount of food stamps ever, to over 46 million people.

Meanwhile, the National Park Service asks us, “Please do not feed the animals.” Their stated reason for the policy is, “The animals will grow dependent on handouts and will not learn to take care of themselves.”

This ends today’s lesson on irony.

Now do you understand how Obama was elected, Mr. Garon?

WAYNE WOOLSEY
Pollock Pines

Letters to the Editor

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 49 comments

  • the watcherNovember 04, 2013 - 4:26 pm

    Good job, WW. But JG won't get it. A product of our systematically dumbed down society, the other way O was elected.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James L HendricksNovember 04, 2013 - 4:26 pm

    Mr. Woolsey, Your 'irony' is sick! So ends my lesson. . J L Hendricks Placerville

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • the watcherNovember 04, 2013 - 4:28 pm

    And your brilliant lesson would be.....

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampNovember 04, 2013 - 4:48 pm

    Morris?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 05, 2013 - 3:54 am

    Yes Phil? Oh, that. Ok. My Commencement Address to the University Class of 2014: Graduates, there are two lessons in life that I learned in the years that would follow earning a master's degree. I'd will share these now. The first is: Never argue with an idiot. People watching might not be able to tell the difference. The second is: Mr. Woolsey is an idiot. Thank you.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynNovember 05, 2013 - 7:37 am

    Morris: Your Lesson #1 is perfectly articulated!!!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampNovember 05, 2013 - 7:59 am

    Morris, I'm trying to reassemble the thought train that led to my summonsing you to this thread . . . . umm . . . Palm Jumeirah? . . . no . . . Ahh! Yes. Feeding animals . . . I left you a story about feeding animals. You never responded. Where have you been? Some of the forum girls are smitten. I'm happy for you. LINK - Morris November 01, 2013 - 10:55 pm

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 05, 2013 - 4:08 am

    I might suggest that if people are starting to look like animals to Mr. Woolsey, then perhaps Mr. Woolsey is spending a bit too much time behind the barn with his sheep. Likely that's why it charges. Just sayin.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • 1036-FrankNovember 04, 2013 - 5:41 pm

    To a liberal to be elected they have to lie and the goal is to dupe the people with whatever lie must be used to get in power whether it was Gay marriage Bummer was against, health care reform that takes away health care for millions, Gays in the military that he opposed or non-authorized by Congress military actions he tried repeatedly. This is why Romney couldn't compete with Santa Bummer and his promises of free, free, free benefits for all and a job is optional and of course free citizenship for being in the country illegally. So far he has sold his free welfare to a record number and has taken nearly 100 million working people out of the job market. Wonder what his next trick is?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • R.j. CarterNovember 05, 2013 - 7:03 am

    W.W.....I love it...Sums it up nicely.....LOL....

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Fran DuchampNovember 05, 2013 - 8:10 am

    Phil--it is the sock puppets...makes him more "human"--but I like you just as much. everyone has their place in our community...even little ricky.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65November 08, 2013 - 5:03 am

    If they could get the bears to register as dimocrats the forest would be full of ice chests with obama's picture on them.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65November 08, 2013 - 5:09 am

    The ugly truth of your irony is the wild animals are better at providing for themselves on a day to day basis than those who comprise the dimocrat voter base. Even in the wild where there isn't a safeway on every corner. It truly is hysterical. It is working out just as leftist ideology plots it.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65November 08, 2013 - 5:16 am

    It is debatable which is the worst form of tyranny. C. S. Lewis says, "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. -- While Oscar Wilde says, " The worst form of tyranny the world has ever known the tyranny of the weak over the strong. It is the only tyranny that lasts." -- It is interesting to note that leftism is the exercise of both of these. Your point is also both of these.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • LouNovember 09, 2013 - 10:01 am

    I think that something we need to do is look past just being able to insult the intellect of another individual who you don't know as a means to state victory in an argument. I am sorry to those I may offend, but I see validity in what Mr. Woolsey is trying to to say. I am a strong believer, and supporter of many of the government support systems for what they were originated to be. However, they were designed for people to find temporary support from and then move on. It's like a person being injured, going through physical therapy and then functioning on ones own again. This has not been the case. It can be shown with many things that if you give things to people for free then they keep coming back for more. Just like a fine example for any parents out there: if you continued to pay for everything for your child and not provide them with the incentive to work for themselves how many would really want to leave? Over use of anything creates dependency and addiction, that is one of the main things that I have learned in my study of society in my graduate classes.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynNovember 09, 2013 - 10:36 am

    Does Mr Woolsey assume the human animals he's talking about are just too lazy to get a job?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynNovember 09, 2013 - 10:39 am

    "Bad Government Policy Has Created the Worst Inequality On Record … And It’s Destroying Our Economy" - HERE

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Oh BrotherNovember 09, 2013 - 1:22 pm

    Very interesting Evelyn, please share with kooky if he/she will open her/his mind...it is not just republican vs democrat. Thanks for your research.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Tom GibneyNovember 09, 2013 - 4:53 pm

    Actually in the last decade plus, there has been an goodly amount of Democratic control when it comes to welfare and entitlement programs. Basically, as stated by some above, these programs were meant to be TEMPORARY. Democrats and Liberal Democrats see themselves as the champions for the poor. Republicans attempt to curve their grandiose expenditures at times and are automatically labeled 'The Bad Guys'. BY the way when was the last time we passed a budget??? Having managed a low rent apartment complex for several years I have seen the results of 'entitlement programs'. In my opinion it has assisted in the 'dumbing down of this nation. SO...Mr. Woolseys lesson on Irony is very aptly put. No amount of name calling and changing the subject by those of you on the Liberal slant will change the fact. Your Ideology is destroying a nation. Old Communists in Russia now wring their hands and laugh with glee. Actually,The Communist Party of the United States Endorsed Obama in 2012...Good Job apparatchiks

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • the watcherNovember 09, 2013 - 5:18 pm

    WW and TG - Very good jobs. And the watcher also got it exactly right.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 09, 2013 - 6:18 pm

    Actually, they got it pretty much wrong. I'm wondering which 'entitlement' programs you are referring to when stating they were meant to be temporary. Social security? Or perhaps Medicare? Or is your reference to welfare; which is and of itself a temporary program that serves as a bridge to self-sufficiency can be accomplished again. It is not permanent, there is a maximum lifetime period in which one can draw aid (here's a clue: its not all that much more than the maximum period of unemployment benefit) and those receiving aid are generally required to perform community service projects in order receive the aid. The pictures you paint of some sort or 'lifetime entitlement' are, simply, lies. For someone who managed low-income house, your knowledge of the program realities is concerning. Perhaps it is best that you moved on to other career opportunities that better suited your particular skill-set.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • the watcherNovember 09, 2013 - 7:35 pm

    Why would you think I am " someone who managed low-income house" ? Every premise you use is wrong. Another dumbed down American voter. I rest my case.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Tom GibneyNovember 09, 2013 - 7:49 pm

    Ever been on Unemployment Morris? Ever had Food stamps? Have you ever wondered where your next meal is coming from or your next dollar?. If so then good for you. I have. And it was not a proud moment. I got cut off because time was up. Why? Because I was honest. Ever managed a low rent apartment complex??? I have had tenants that were on Unemployment for 2 years. At the same time they under the table jobs (like many do) once in a while never reporting the income. I had tenants on Food stamps who went to the Casino and bragged of the freebies they got from Gov. and County. As well still be able to afford their pot. Meanwhile I was managing an apartment complex trying to find at least a $10 hr job to pay for food and gas. (Been rough since your boy Obama took office ....I haven't been able to find a decent job since 09') In any case NO, your twisting and adding words won't grant you my apology for Your Obama and those who voted for him. Nice try but that dog don't hunt anymore.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 10, 2013 - 12:29 am

    Fair questions Mr. Gibney. The candid answers: 1. No, I have never been on unemployment. 2. No food stamps. 3. Have never personally known the reality of hunger. 4. My experience with financial matters is non-typical to that of most individuals; comparisons would be inappropriate but will give to you a cautious 'no'. The wonder was removed before I was born. Are these the responses you wished to see? That somehow the individual with a much different view of the needy and the reality of their struggles has, indeed, never truly faced a hardship that provides sufficient street cred of challenge to that of your own? Those were not questions; they were qualifiers. Suffice it to say that I have known personal hardship by horror; not by economics. But honestly, neither your past realities or those of my own are of any merit here. The qualities of empathy, compassion and grace are. As well, the ability to look beyond your own personal prejudice and personal bias of perspective and take in the view of not what you have already told yourself to see but rather that which is truly being seen. Obviously some bad apples have been witnessed by yourself. I don't doubt this. But those examples are no more representative of the whole or their struggles than saying because my neighbor got his cousin pregnant - in a trailer - that all white people in EDC are trailer living hillbillies. The fact that I know a republican politician who leads a secret life counter to the values of his party in no way shape or form means that every republican is a lying hypocrite. I got pulled over for doing 164mph in a 65 zone...does this make every middle-aged white dude with a mid-life crisis car a total vehicular douche? No! Just ME. I only know that others in similar cars and of similar age are only just THAT; similar car. Similar age. So my point here is that welfare is not an entitlement and it is not something people are on from cradle to grave and if someone is bragging about all the free stuff they get than that one person is an ass who probably lives - in reality - a life on constant unfulfilled want. He or she ain't getting rich off of a few hundred bucks in cash each month, some food stamps and a 10.00 gas card from the Mormons. Meanwhile, there are many folks who struggle in such a dignified manner that you never see them...because you aren't looking for them. You are only looking for the worst examples that meet the profile that you have conditioned yourself to expect. The humble escape notice because they are humble. They are human. They have fallen. And had to ask for help. They are not animals. They want to restore their dignity. We can take but a small slice from our blessings - literally a half a dozen dimes - and collectively feed someone and keep them warm, safe and dry. That is what people of compassion do; they do not walk by and ignore the cries of another person. No matter if a few bad apples are present; every human situation has these apples. Pick a few never seen before...you might just be surprised by its beauty. (For the record, I serve as successor trustee to a family foundation and trust that funds a number of initiatives; most of which are centered upon lifting individuals out of the cycles of poverty. I have been to their homes, met their families and listened to their stories. It is by that gift that my eyesight was restored.)

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • PollockerNovember 10, 2013 - 6:54 am

    Morris, You’ve said that welfare “is not permanent, there is a maximum lifetime period in which one can draw aid (here's a clue: its not all that much more than the maximum period of unemployment benefit) and those receiving aid are generally required to perform community service projects in order receive the aid.” And “welfare is not an entitlement and it is not something people are on from cradle to grave.” You are completely ill-informed! When a woman has a (almost always illegitimate) baby she can’t support, she gets welfare until that child is 18! That money is not cut off in a couple of years. Have another baby? Get more money for that 2nd baby. Now you’re into 2 decades. Housing, free Obamaphone, free medical care, free dental care, food stamps, plus gifts for the kids at Christmas. Like Obamacare, the poorer you make yourself (and the more your children suffer and see “the life”) by the number of kids you have, the more subsidies you receive. No need to work because, thanks to the taxpayers, you get to pretend you’re a homemaker. That is the reality for millions of Americans. Half of my family lives like that and has for 2 decades. My siblings’ kids are now repeating the cycle with their own illegitimate children. It’s what they know. And you don’t think this is an enormous problem? A lifestyle that has developed in the last 3 decades? Please stop comparing retirement Social Security and Medicare to Welfare, Section 8 housing, food stamps, etc. Those of us who have retired and now get Social Security involuntarily paid into it for 4 or more decades. If we’re lucky, we’ll get some or all of our money out, with interest. And don’t get me started on Obamacare. Medical subsidies and millions more on Medicaid? That’s just more welfare – taking money I earned and handing over to someone else.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Oh BrotherNovember 10, 2013 - 8:23 am

    Unemployment problems started in 2008...In 1982 unemployment and housing were horrible also...not just one time in this life has the unemployment and economy been poor so please stop blaming just one individual...get real..and I have been hungry, poor and on aid and I am not a cheater...

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynNovember 10, 2013 - 8:36 am

    Oh Brother: Wikipedia's useful overview includes THIS: U.S. job creation since the year 2000 has been considerably below the 1970-2000 rate. From peak to trough, nearly nine million jobs were lost due to the global economic crisis that began to affect employment in 2008. . . . "In nearly every sector of our economy, far fewer firms control far greater shares of their markets than they did a generation ago. Indeed, in the years after officials in the Reagan administration radically altered how our government enforces our anti-monopoly laws, the American economy underwent a truly revolutionary restructuring. Four great waves of mergers and acquisitions—in the mid-1980s, early '90s, late '90s, and between 2003 and 2007—transformed America's industrial landscape at least as much as globalization."

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Tom GibneyNovember 09, 2013 - 8:52 pm

    Oh incidentally Morris, my wife and I got out of the Apt. managing biz almost two years ago. Thankfully some of my long term investments paid off. I found that investing in Strums&Ruger and Smith and Wesson was profitable, along with Chevron...I may be under employed, But at least I can make lemonade out the Lemons your man Obama brought forth ... .

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65November 10, 2013 - 11:27 am

    Tom Gibney, good friends of mine have a property management business. A LOT of properties. They have tenants who are on section 8 housing that there is no end to. They were recently telling me of one such case where the tenant is an older Russian immigrant woman who has been here in this country for 6 months. When they called to see how long they could make the lease for the reply was INDEFINATLY. This woman doesn't speak English and has never contributed a single dime to the American economy but will be provided for by the taxpayers for as long as she lives. My friends have many many cases just like it. The dirty little truth that never seems to get discusses is with what my friends pay in taxes every single month they could hire 5 more full time employees. And so it goes. Socialism is great until you run out of other peoples money. Those who try and sell the notion that it isn't out of control are lying to themselves.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynNovember 09, 2013 - 12:53 pm

    WILL WORK FOR FREE - HERE (2 hr. video)

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James E.November 09, 2013 - 1:32 pm

    Let us all just assume Cookie is a woman and we can move on. Cookie, where is that information I need to answer your liberalism/production question. You know, can it be a can of peas, etc., etc., etc.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • cookie65November 10, 2013 - 4:56 am

    Here is an interesting view into some of the results of these programs. I DIDN'T write it. It is from the Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2013/11/09/too-much-of-too-little/?tid=ts_carousel=

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Oh BrotherNovember 10, 2013 - 8:56 am

    When Michelle Obama brought up these issues she was accused of taking away civil rights.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 10, 2013 - 7:25 am

    From the Public Policy Institute of California: Time limitation: .....'In California, adults have a 60-month time limit on welfare benefits, but children can continue to receive welfare benefits after parents have reached time limits, as long as they remain otherwise eligible.' And ....'When state lawmakers fashioned the CalWORKs program in 1996 and 1997, they established policies intended to further the state’s “work-first” approach for adults on welfare while preserving a safety net for children (Zellman et al., 1999).1 Consequently, CalWORKs sanction and time-limit policies focus penalties on adults. California continued the sanction policy established under AFDC, the federal cash assistance program preceding TANF. That policy calls for a reduction in the family’s aid payment equal to the sanctioned adult’s share for as long as that adult remains out of compliance with requirements' On work requirements: ....'The federal legislation creating TANF in 1996 required that states engage 50 percent of most welfare adults for 20 or 30 hours a week in work or in related activities (job search or education related to employment, work experience, and so on)—or face fiscal penalties. States were also required to engage 90 percent of those families with both parents on welfare in work activities. These are known, respectively, as the “All Families” and the “Two Parent” work participation rate requirements in the federal legislation.1 1 Single parents of children under age 6 fulfill the federal requirement by working at least 20 hours each week, while most single parents of older children, and one adult in two-parent families with children of any age, must work at least 30 hours a week. And finally on having more children, there is the 'family cap' that denies welfare to additional children born while the mother is receiving assistance.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • pollockerNovember 10, 2013 - 10:00 am

    Twenty hours a week of employment? After several years of time to go to school or not? Try 40 hrs a week like the rest of us and hell yes we will provide free day care for a while. And I mean 6 weeks after birth. No taxpayer-funded "pretend homemaker.". I guarantee that would change the birth rate. Food stamps go up as the family size increases. So do housing subsidies and the cost of the family to the taxpayers. Only the monthly family cash stipend is limited, and holly Mitchell wants to change that.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 10, 2013 - 8:27 am

    Please note that I am NOT advocating welfare. Those who think this to be the case are completely missing the point. Which is: The image that we like to paint of the 'typical' welfare recipient is not true. The vast majority of those on welfare look nothing like this stereotype and are not lifetime receipts. The more accurate statement is that most recipients are out of the system within a few years. For those that remain, additional ideas are absolutely needed and should be tested. As they have considering the family cap, term limits and other realities introduced within the last 15 years. But in this supposed lifetime achievement award of welfare inaccurately painted, we - all of us - have no matter what have left a number of individuals behind. One segment is African-Americans. I'm not looking to get into a debate on race relations or personal accountability; my feelings on these subjects are likely not what most will shoehorn-liberal me into. However, one does not erase the legacy of slavery and its profound impact upon the many generations since the institution was abolished. In my lifetime - my lifetime and I'm middle aged mind you - I remember 'whites only' and 'colored'. It wasn't that long ago. And for others stuck in this group left behind who are not impacted like African-Americans, they have been left behind just the same and its our own damn fault. Our public schools fail our children. And we fail our children. By cutting funding. By cutting parenting. We seem to be stuck on this myth that both parents must work to survive. That in and of itself is largely a lie we tell ourselves; although for some low-income families it is a reality. But for us in EDC; mostly it is this: Two cars. Four cell phones. Cable TV. A boat. A Camper. Labels, Lables and Lables. Lattes. Lunches. Liquor. Lunchables. Lorazepam. But instead of looking inward, we point the finger elsewhere and where better than to those least in a position to defend themselves. All to make ourselves feel better about not doing our part, being self-absorbed and, frankly, fake. Much easier to make sweeping generalizations about some detached animal without a face so we ourselves won't have to face the truth: We are greedy, selfish and mad not that a child might go hungry but mad they it gets something we don't. But what really just boils the bunny is even if folks don't agree with my position - which is a perfectly understandable reality btw - they *****andmoan about the lazy SOB's BUT NEVER OFFER A SOLUTION. Nothing. Cut 'em off. Sink or swim. But let's be honest here, say what you really mean if you are going to say it at all. It goes like this: 'Cut them all off. I'm OK that some will live. I'm OK that some will die. The ones that die or slowly waste away from malnutrition are weak animals and that's the way it is and I'm ok with that. I'm OK with letting people starve to death or freeze to death and I'm ok with walking right by them and ignoring their cries for help. They deserve it for their lazy ways or poor choices or insert any other detachment I choose (but of course MY kid Kaitlyn Savanna Madison Ashley Jones isnt included despite her bad choices because shes different) because obviously I'm right because I am warm, safe dry and full.' I'd have more respect for that person than most all of the hard-liners here posting. At least that person is an honest reflection in his mirror and his mouth. Most all the others wanna dance around what they don't have the guts to say or the willingness to accept they might just be wrong. Truth hurts. The lie worse.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Oh BrotherNovember 10, 2013 - 8:41 am

    Thank you Morris for writing all of that out...people cannot just keep getting pregnant and keep getting welfare....jeez that may have been the way many years ago but sure isn't now. The CalFresh or what I call the back to work programs got stalled when there were no jobs...if there is no job there is no job and blame who you want...very poor work economy has happened while other presidents were in office. I personally think the welfare program is really strict and doesn't allow for a lifetime in benefits in this day and age...now I am not saying that someone out there doesn't know someone who has done something but I know what the rules are and Morris has generously provided them.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynNovember 10, 2013 - 9:26 am

    The Offshore Outsourcing of American Jobs: A Greater Threat Than Terrorism - HERE (by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Sec. of Treas., Reagan administration)

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • pollockerNovember 10, 2013 - 9:50 am

    Add to that (the lack of well paying jobs for the unskilled) the utter acceptance of immoral behavior (tens of millions of children born out of wedlock to mothers on the dole) and a poor work ethic, and you have a huge population of takers provided for by a diminishing population of tax payers. This is not a temporary situation. It is cultural, multi-racial, and worsening. Those of you libs who disagree, how many people have you known who were on all aid only very temporarily, vs for many years?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 10, 2013 - 10:03 am

    Since I don't know everyone on welfare, the question of 'how many are on temporarily vs many years' is not one I can personally answer. However, those that DO know everyone on public assistance have provided these figures: 50% leave the system in one year or less, 70% do so within two years and nearly 90% in five years. Opinion is opinion. Fact is fact. Important distinction.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Dude 2 UNovember 10, 2013 - 4:23 pm

    Morronis, "Those that DO know everyone on public assistance have provided these figures: 50% leave the system in one year or less, 70% do so within two years and nearly 90% in five years." Yeh right. U are spreading the same lies given out by the same agencies relying on distributing the bennies. Its all part of the big plan... growing democrats. Oops, silly me I forgot Obamas administration is the MOST transparent ever! Wake up a$$h_ _ _ . My neighbors daughter, 24 has pumped out 4 kids since 16, gave two to her scamming parents spreading the wealth. AFDC is alive and well and killing our future.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 10, 2013 - 4:28 pm

    Guess you should have used protection. Better luck next time Uncle Daddy.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • the watcherNovember 10, 2013 - 4:39 pm

    Save yer breath, Dude, and the prints on yer index fingers. Morronis is a product of the Olftie dumbed down electorate. He's how we got into this mess. Just keep on shelling out those tax dollars you earned so we can give them to bums who didn't, and make us all equal. You know what happens when we all become equal? We become equally poor. Just ask any Chinese who is a product of the cultural revolution. They still haven't recovered from where we are headed.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 10, 2013 - 5:39 pm

    And an expert on China as well? Wow. You must think a lot. Guess we have the answer now to the facts regarding leading luxury retailers in China and all those sales numbers. PRADA 23% of their sales receipts. BURBERRY: 30% COACH: 19%. Selling to individuals holding 9% of global wealth held by 4% of global millionaires. Living within the worlds second largest economy. Driving BMW's as fast as the boats can unload em. Yup. Never recovered. Just gotta sit and think and all the answers just flow like grits on cliff.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Sean OnneryNovember 10, 2013 - 4:48 pm

    watcher ......... such simplistic conclusions require very little breath.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • the watcherNovember 10, 2013 - 4:48 pm

    It is simple. Just pay attention and think.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 10, 2013 - 4:55 pm

    Watcher: I am VERY curious for enlightenment with respect to my 'every premise (sic) being wrong'. I'm listening. Which premise will you prove-up as wrong first; that the benefits are temporary, the issue of time limitations, the lifetime maximum benefit or the requirement to perform community service? Seems to me counselor that your arguments haven't been presented at all and you simply wish to 'rest your case' without offering up any opening or closing or even any evidence whatsoever. This on a matter stare decisis? Wow. Well, here is your chance for matter of first impression. For precedent. I'm listening. Enlighten us with your facts. I am kinda dumberdowndedtho so if you could please cite your sources and reference links slowly, I'd appreciate it. I'm taking notes in crayon because my Etch-A-Sketch tablet isn't charging. Maybe you can make that right too. (Noticed yours out on your Big Wheel) Ok thanks.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • the watcherNovember 10, 2013 - 7:37 pm

    The people there aren't able to buy those luxury things you mention. They're all still "equal". The rest of your drivel is too inane to merit comment.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • MorrisNovember 10, 2013 - 8:03 pm

    Oh, so ya got nothing but a few (weak) attempts at insults to compliment that broad knowledge of public policy and international economic patterns. Tells us again about what its like to have G8 leaders seek you out for your direction on matters of economic policy and inside tips in arbitrage.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
.

News

Heard over the back fence: Advice offered writers

By Bob Billingsley | From Page: B1

 
Big marijuana find in EDH

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1, 1 Comment | Gallery

Jury: Sanford guilty of murder

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1, 2 Comments | Gallery

 
Initiative seeks roundabout vote

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: A1, 2 Comments

 
Sheriff cracking down on Tahoe pot grows

By Tahoe Tribune | From Page: A3

 
Burn permits required May 1

By Cal Fire | From Page: A7

County backs task force to reduce human trafficking

By Chris Daley | From Page: A13

 
5 years prison for child porn

By News Release | From Page: A14

A victim tells her story

By Chris Daley | From Page: A14

 
.

Opinion

 
Income inequality

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4, 2 Comments

Billingsley’s Bullets: Marriage makes me laugh

By Bob Billingsley | From Page: A4

 
.

Letters

What happened to ‘fair and balanced?’

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 14 Comments

 
Red tape

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Is Ukraine in Asia, Europe or Latin America?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 20 Comments

 
Vote for Parlin

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 1 Comment

County and ‘Miwoks’ getting together

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 1 Comment

 
Ray Nutting’s donation for DA

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 7 Comments

.

Sports

 
Brown leads Golden Sierra

By Rebecca Reddish | From Page: A9

Cougars 1, Grizzlies 1

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A9

 
Cougars capitalize against Union Mine

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A9 | Gallery

Troy unpends Davis

By Brandon Anicich | From Page: A9 | Gallery

 
El Dorado wins tri-meet

By Mike Bush | From Page: A9 | Gallery

D’backs drop the ‘Hammer’

By Mike Bush | From Page: A9

 
El Dorado spikers blank D’backs

By Mike Bush | From Page: A10

Roundup: April 23, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A10

 
On tap

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A10

.

Prospecting

Amazing production brings the curtain down for Pete Miller

By Pat Lakey | From Page: B1 | Gallery

 
Things to do: April 25, 2014

By Democrat Calendar | From Page: B2

Cool Beerwerks is very cool

By Krysten Kellum | From Page: B2 | Gallery

 
Placerville celebrates Earth Day

By News Release | From Page: B3

Handcar Derby to get pumping

By Folsom Handcar Derby | From Page: B3

 
IT presents a Reader’s Theater of ‘Our Town’

By Imagination Theater | From Page: B4 | Gallery

Enjoy spring with Steiner Road wineries

By Steiner Road Wineries | From Page: B4

 
Art and brew are a perfect pair

By News Release | From Page: B5

Spring cleaning is good

Press Release | From Page: B5, 1 Comment

 
Pinewood Derby rolls at Kniesel’s

Press Release | From Page: B6

The Sacramento Music Festival celebrates world-class music

By Sacramento Music Festival | From Page: B12

 
Oak Ridge Boys come to TJ’s Corral

By Carson Valley Inn | From Page: B13

Folsom hosts Spring Antique Fair

By Folsom Historic District Association | From Page: B13

 
Viviana Guzman performs at Petroglyphe Gallery

By Petroglyphe Gallery | From Page: B13

Pioneer Jews of the Gold rush

By Folsom History | From Page: B14, 1 Comment

 
Time to join the El Dorado Community Concert Association

By El Dorado Community Concert Association | From Page: B14

.

Essentials

.

Obituaries

Frances Estelle Gilluly Fraulob

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
Dorothy L. Irvin

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Jeanine Rae Henderson-Hodges

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
Thomas David Ewing

By Contributor | From Page: A2

John Lawrence Olson

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
Jack O’Camb

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Wesley M. Nyquist

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
.

Real Estate

Spring statistics suggest slower sales

By Ken Calhoon | From Page: HS4

 
Time to spring outdoors and fix them up

By Marni Jameson | From Page: HS7

Nation’s existing home sales remain soft

Press Release | From Page: HS20

 
.

Comics

Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A11

 
Sudoku

By Contributor | From Page: A11

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A11

 
Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A11

Tundra

By Contributor | From Page: A11

 
Shoe

By Contributor | From Page: A11

Rubes

By Contributor | From Page: A11

 
Horoscope, Friday, April 25, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A12

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A12

 
Horoscope, Sunday, April 27, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A12

Horoscope, Saturday, April 26, 2104

By Contributor | From Page: A12

 
.

Home Source

Spring statistics suggest slower sales

By Ken Calhoon | From Page: HS4

Time to spring outdoors and fix them up

By Marni Jameson | From Page: HS7

Nation’s existing home sales remain soft

Press Release | From Page: HS20