Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
I noticed a significant misquote in your coverage of the Candidates’ Forum at the Tea Party of El Dorado Hills regarding my views on public pensions. Knowing that your publication represents the finest standards of journalism and seeks to promote the public good through the most comprehensive and objective reporting possible, I am writing to help your readership obtain the actual commentary from that evening. Thanks for publishing it for clarity. For the record, I do not wish to “reel in” public pensions as has been reported.
It is fortunate that the forum was recorded so that the citizens of El Dorado County are able to discern my message from that evening. I encourage review of that conversation at youtube.com/watch?v=f_u-GA4X2o0, specifically the discussion beginning at the 2:00 mark and continuing to the 3:00 mark. Careful reviewers will note that I was speaking about reeling in spending ideas and expectations and not about “reeling in public pensions.”
It is no secret that our county has an unfunded pension liability.
Public pensions represent a contract with the retired employees who earned them. I did not suggest that the existing pensions change in any way. The county has taken steps to reduce its pension liability by decreasing the pension expectations for newer county hires. That action directly supports my assertions about reeling in both expectations and future costs.