Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
Much has been said and printed about the Small Farm irrigation rate structure. One thing is certain in this controversy: that the definition and proof of production (qualification) is complex and confusing. It appears that one form of a “Small Farm” consists of 24 olive trees. This analysis uses that format.
A question arises: What are the water, irrigation, requirements for this type of orchard? And therefore what amount of subsidy is required to support this classification?
The answer is about 7,500 CF on an annual basis less rainfall. This figure is based on the maximum needs, 100 percent Etc. UC Davis recommends between 40 and 70 percent Etc.
As a SFR, Single-Family Resident, ratepayer, I suggest that the subsidy for this typical orchard of 24 table olive trees be limited to 7,500 CF annually. This is the quantity of water necessary to achieve the purpose of the Small Farm rate.
All data in this analysis is presented on the UC Davis Website: ucmanagedrought.ucdavis.edu.