Monday, May 21, 2012
CALIFORNIA'S OLDEST NEWSPAPER - EST. 1851
Volume 161 · Issue 61 | 99¢
 

Placerville’s new housing element required by state

By
Democrat correspondent From page A4 | February 20, 2012 | 11 Comments

EDITOR: FYI, for those who may not be aware, either for or against this, the California Legislature has a new major housing goal: A decent home and suitable living environments for every resident iin the state.

Link to Placerville's New Housing elements, which is posted on the main City of Placerville’s Web page: cityofplacerville.org/civica/filebank/blobdload.asp?BlobID=5802.

A hearing was schedule Feb 14. This is coming from SACOG (Sacramento Area Council of Governments) and the state. They have mandated that each city and county within their region that belongs to SACOG have their appropriate share of housing within our city limits and county limits, to have housing for population groups that have special needs.

SACOG has their Metropolitan Transportation Plan on their Web page or MTP.

Placerville has been having hearings for the public regarding the New Housing Element to the General Plan that implements housing policies to all housing and land-use citywide.

High density housing and in-fill within the city limits. The city has made a diligent effort to achieve involvement of all economic groups, particularly low-income, special needs groups and non-profits. Notices have also been posted at City Hall, public areas, and in the notices section in the Mountain Democrat.

The city has provided the Department of Housing and Community Development a list of Placerville’s vacant land (parcel) inventory. The city has identified over 421 acres of residential zoned and designated land that could accommodate 1,100 or more dwelling units of high density development within the city limits.

Builders can put up to 20 units per acre. Potential development incentives and funding are available for development of these properties There is no upper limit on residential densities in mixed-use projects in commercial zones. These figures may continue to grow regardless of its feasibility. Your property can be rezoned.

Some population groups have special housing needs by virtue of their physical or developmental capabilities, childcare needs, occupations, and other factors.

Examples of special needs groups are seniors, persons with disabilities, large families, single-parent, households, farm workers and their families, and homeless individuals and families. Also workforce housing.

If City Council determines the need for such a study, as indicated, based on the availability of state funding, the city may prepare a study of options to provide housing that is affordable to, and meets the needs of, residents who are employed locally (workforce housing).

A survey of major employers will assess the wages of the local workforce. This survey will assist the city in determining the mix of afford ability levels appropriate for the city workforce. The city will update the wage study every two years.

Employment in Placerville is dominated by retail, public agency, and service organizations. The city will annex land within its Sphere of Influence, (SOI) to maintain an adequate supply of residential land, as required, and mandated, to build Placerville's share of housing, for special housing needs as determined (SOI-that term was used with Redevelopment).  Assumption is that it is within the same boundaries as Redevelopment. The city will promote in-fill development by identifying suitable sites.The city will continue to pursue a variety of state and federal funding. (This looks like it is funding based, subsidies, incentives, loans,and government financial assisted). The city has identified several state, federal, and private funding programs. There is a lot of funding through out the entire document.

I recently read an article regarding the Sutter Board of Supervisors rejected a resolution to apply for a state grant to help them pay for the update to their county's zoning ordinance. They said no to giving up local control for a state grant, which they felt had strings attached. The grant that they considered came out of Proposition 84, which is a state bond measure that they felt fell under build sustainable communities. A supervisor told them that the update is necessary. Speakers, and those that attended the meeting, said that sustainable communities actually means losing private property rights and giving up local control of their county."State money comes with strings attached to the funding."

VICKI CLARK


Placerville

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 11 comments

The Mountain Democrat does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy

  • Peter SwansonFebruary 16, 2012 - 4:30 pm

    You cannot stop this so you may as well try to do it right.

  • Off to slaughterFebruary 16, 2012 - 10:59 pm

    @ Peter Swanson. Piss off, have you completely given up to the Commies amongst us, or have you always been a little girl??? Are your Parents proud of the soft head they've produced? What you just said, "You cannot stop this so you may as well try to do it right.", might well have been uttered verbatim not so long ago by another despicable group halfway around the World, the Nazi's. You need to clarify your position before you get pegged as supporting this Marxist Social Engineering cr@p. . The Hell we can't stop this. This proud American ain't giving up any God given freedoms, to anyone. I just want to know if you're for or against, this State dictating how locals must design & implement land use decisions from high above, from a Utopian Marxist/Socialist Dictatorship. Think my choice of words are too strong?? Then you haven't read the cr@p they're pushing, my friend. So are you part of the problem? Or one with an American spine to tell the State to go to Hell? And return local land use decisions back to local Jurisdictions. I share harsh words with you unintentionally, while my real sorrow is for the Sheeple out there with absolutely no clue, as to the pen they are being slowly corralled into. God bless America, and I pray for the People to wake up.

  • Peter SwansonFebruary 17, 2012 - 12:08 am

    Have you never heard of Godwin's law? You just lost the argument.

  • MartinFebruary 22, 2012 - 5:13 pm

    This is the agenda 21 in full swing, stop it now or forever hold your ass because they (Nazi's) are out take your freedom.

  • Fred MonanhanFebruary 17, 2012 - 2:03 pm

    "Speakers, and those that attended the meeting, said that sustainable communities actually means losing private property rights and giving up local control of their county." This must be true, because somebody who attended the meeting said so.

  • gato pelonFebruary 18, 2012 - 8:21 am

    This sound like invoking eminent domain.....

  • Bob BareliFebruary 18, 2012 - 9:07 am

    It has nothing to do with eminent domain. Eminent domain is a state appropriation of land, with fair compensation, for a public use. An example would be where the state forces a farmer to sell a piece of property so that a straight highway can be built, rather than having the highway inefficiently zigzag all over the state. In this case, the state & county are setting affordable housing goals, not taking land.

  • MartinFebruary 22, 2012 - 5:14 pm

    Bull

  • Filipino RedneckFebruary 24, 2012 - 11:43 am

    This is not "eminent domain' in our sense of the word, but if you want to study the United Nations' Agenda 21 issue and arguments against it, you will then consider this a 'GLOBAL VERSION" of eminent domain! Like previous posters have put on this post, EVERYONE ELSE has to wake up to this insidious plan by GLOBALISTS! This is NOT a Democrat vs. Republican vs. Libertarian or left vs. right or pro-growth vs. no-growth issue. This is an ANTI-AMERICAN issue that has been supported by our nation's leaders since 1992...EVERY ONE OF THEM! There is a reason that cities like Novato, Palo Alto have recently spoken up against these mandates. SACOG is NOT AN ELECTED BODY...it is a collective of 22 cities and 6 counties that try to work together for the common good and planning, but in the end, we, they all do not work for each of our communities so you can tell your electeds to tell SACOG to "go pound sand" if YOU as citizens do not like outside governmentium slammed down our throats. God Bless America for we are.....One Nation Under God!

  • Vicki ClarkFebruary 27, 2012 - 1:46 am

    The Public Hearing for the New Housing Element Plan is scheduled for this Tuesday night at 7 PM to voice your opinion. Letters may be sent also. Letters can be sent to the City Council and City Manger via email by the end of today. It was posted in the Mountain Democrat and City Hall.

  • TontoFebruary 27, 2012 - 6:14 am

    No silver lining here, just the first step in aquiring land for the city annex, no benefit to the land owner just more city tax base and an attempt to aquire more area to a city that grew backwards and has limits.

.

News

Heard over the back fence: Three-day dog event coming

By Bob Billingsley | From Page: B1

 
 
Blooming irises herald spring

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Former mayor’s trial delayed

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1, 4 Comments

 
Eskaton Village approved

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: A1

 
Crime log: May 2-3

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

Ponderosa grad admitted to West Point

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: A3 | Gallery

 
Woman arrested following crash

By Tahoe Tribune | From Page: A3

Fire in Omo Ranch contained

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A3

 
Betchley battle goes back and forth

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A9, 2 Comments

 
Folsom Handcar Derby

By Shelly Thorene | From Page: A10

.

Opinion

 
Drone suits

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4, 4 Comments

 
.

Letters

Wasting tax dollars on consficating stuffed animals

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 4 Comments

 
School elementary school music

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Education held for ransom

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 6 Comments

 
Pay now or pay later for animal crossings

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 4 Comments

Stoplight unneeded

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 3 Comments

 
Spaghetti feed thanks

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Availability of prescription drugs in California

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 4 Comments

 
.

Sports

Schedule: May 21-26, 2012

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6

 
Davis nine knocks Trojans out

By Mike Bush | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Cougar boys take 1st at Divisionals

By Rebecca Reddish | From Page: A6

 
Bruin softball splits opening round

By Mike Bush | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Trio of gold at Division I meet

By Mike Bush | From Page: A6

 
Forsberg drives to second victory

Press Release | From Page: A6

.

Features

As we were: Shakespeare Club turns 90

By Ken Deibert | From Page: B2

 
Sandy Coash is Big Sister of the Year

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Noah Bentley is Big Brother of the Year

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: B2, 1 Comment

 
Hangtown Kennel Club hosts big show

Press Release | From Page: B2

Master Food Preservers: Salt and salt

By Ora Emmerich | From Page: B3

 
Pines at Placerville making changes

Press Release | From Page: B10

 
Student to compete for teen title

Press Release | From Page: B10

.

Essentials

Permits Issued: 5/14/-5/18/2012

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2

 
.

Obituaries

Genevieve Dolores Marsh

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
Thomas Henderson Adam

By Contributor | From Page: A2

.

Real Estate

.

Comics

Rubes

By Contributor | From Page: A8

 
Shoe

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Tundra

By Contributor | From Page: A8

 
Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A8

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A8

 
Sudoku

By Contributor | From Page: A8

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A8

 
Horoscope, Tuesday, May 22, 2012

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Horoscope, Monday, May 21, 2012

By Contributor | From Page: A8