Wendy Schultz, in her column, “Something To Think About,” wrote about South Dakota arming their teachers as “sentinels” and gave many arguments why this was not a good idea. Her approach was based on a fallacious assumption, that the firearm would be unloaded, separated from the ammunition and in a safe place. This is about as clear thinking as having empty fire extinguishers in case of a fire.
The firearm should be on the person of the sentinel and loaded, ready to use. Not in the desk, not in a locked box, not in a “safe” place, not in a purse but instantly ready to use. Of course, the teacher would be trained and be proficient in the use of the firearm. This would provide safety for the wards of the teacher that is not provided by an armed officer outside the school or a sign proclaiming the school to be a gun free zone. I think that Wendy should rethink her position based on realities and not fuzzy thinking.