Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
Hysterical accusations of betrayal and stomping on residents’ wishes have been flying around lately regarding the delay of the “Reinstate Measure Y Initiative” pending an economic impact report.
First, let me say that there are no huge housing developments planned for my immediate area and I was not one of the petition signature gathers. However, I fully supported the original Measure Y Initiative written by the Measure Y Committee, including Bill Center and Jim Moore, and I want EDC to remain rural and do not want to plan my life around gridlocked traffic.
So I was puzzled as to why Center and Moore would want to encourage an economic impact report on “Reinstate Measure Y’s Original Intent,” the very initiative they helped author. Well, as it turns out, the current Measure Y proposal significantly changed the language of the original initiative so that it would be much more restrictive to economic development in our county.
While I believe that few county residents would want to see more rooftops and gridlocked traffic, I think most of us would like a thriving economy with more local jobs and businesses. This new proposal to “Reinstate Measure Y’s Original Intent,” if enacted, would have negatively impacted that goal.
I applaud the Board of Supervisors, Bill Center and Jim Moore for asking that this initiative undergo a 30-day economic impact study. If anyone has the right to feel betrayed, it should be the voters who signed the initiative petition thinking that it was simply the original Measure Y Initiative when it wasn’t.