Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
In relationship to the Second Amendment, a gun fired in 1776 required that you put powder in the pan, stuff a ball down the barrel, use a piece of flint to ignite the powder, then shoot. This procedure took from 30 to 60 seconds. Also, the country depended on the militia to support and defend it, so it had to be armed.
Fast forward to 2013. Now we have arms that shoot, let’s say, at least 1,000 times faster than our old muzzle loader. We have a professional military to defend us, so the intent of the Second Amendment is no longer valid.
Now, I’m not proposing the elimination of the Second Amendment. What I am suggesting is that we can’t use what was valid in 1776 to excuse all and any type of weaponry in 2013. Using the Second Amendment as a battle cry to excuse the use of weapons that have no other purpose than to kill, is ridiculous.
Gun owner, Placerville