EDITOR: GDPUD misrepresents a “retrofit” of the Auburn Lake Trails water treatment plant what is actually a total plant “replacement.” It claims the mandate to add filtration requires a new plant. Kind of like being told you must buy a new car in order to meet the requirement to install seat belts.
Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
The two “workshops” for the public input were either given one to two days notice or buried in legal notices where no one would see them.
At the meeting it was pointed out that in 2008, GDPUD requested a rate increase, “major reason” (their wording) to finance the Greenwood Lake project. In 2009 they cancelled the project as too costly but they continue to collect the funding today. A board member denied the project was the major reason for the rate increase so the original request submitted by GDPUD was read. The board went silent. One board member stated, “You make it sound like we are stealing thousands of dollars.”
What would you call the continued annual collection of $154,000, more than half of which was collected for a now cancelled project? Since the “major reason” for the collection was the cancelled project, you would think that at least 51 percent would be returned to the ratepayers.
The new proposal carries the same format with no guarantees of how much of the money will be spent on a questionably necessary plant “replacement.” But over the life of the loan for which this money is critical, GDPUD will collect over $12 million.