Wednesday, April 16, 2014



“The only thing that should surprise us is that there are still some things that can surprise us.” — Francois de La Rochefoucauld

Once again it seems that our county officials are jumping the gun in attempting to locate the Western Slope Animal Shelter in the midst of an already existing small business and residential area. Over 100 sites were considered, and this is the decision? The inclusion of providing areas for livestock and other large animals introduces a variety of potential hazards requiring deeper thinking into the consequences. Insect control, rodent control, predator control, additional security and lighting, dust control, waste control and water run-off are some of those items needing consideration. If you take the time read the Negative Declaration to Draft Environmental Report, I am convinced that you too will find it to be genuinely lacking of fact, mitigation of impact and extremely vague in all aspects. It smacks of convenience over consideration.

I am fearful that the discussion will be couched in the parameters of the noble, animal-loving, caring folks — the “good guys,” versus the cold-hearted, animal-hating, evil folks — the “bad guys.” Of course this is way too simplistic and does not accurately reflect the concerns of those opposed to the animal shelter being located in the middle of a small business and residential area. It will also serve to demonize those who sincerely believe there are better locations to site the facility and will be used by pro-location officials to ease their responsibility to work to find a better and more appropriate site.

I personally love and have always had pets. I have rescued animals from shelters, but more commonly have rescued them from the streets, or before they ended up on the streets — before they found themselves in the hands of animal control. So, I will not listen to any argument regarding my lack of concern for animals. It is just not true.

In this age of overreaching and continual disregard for the citizens at all levels of government, where public service no longer means serving the public for the common good but rather imposing itself upon the citizens, isn’t it about time that we all starting working together for the good of all? It seems we have forgotten our sense of community and common goals. Of course we all want to provide for the safety and welfare of our beloved pets and other animals, but we don’t need to accept that goal if it means deleterious effects on the safety, security and quality of life for our residents and small businesses.

Let’s all agree that this location is not in the best interest of anyone involved and start to work towards a site that will both cover the needs of the animals, the animal control staff and volunteers, our small businesses, residents and, lastly, our government.


Letters to the Editor


Discussion | 5 comments

  • JimBoJuly 08, 2013 - 1:43 pm

    John, this decision is based purely on an incompetent bean counter running the EDC Facilities Department. He based the location solely on price and the property owner he could beat up the most in negotiations. He took 6 different property owners and beat them down against each other. Everyone knows this is not a good location for the animal shelter and that the environmental site considerations were never even a second thought. This bean counter only thinks in terms of lowest price - not what is best for the community. The poorly prepared Neg. Dec is a conflict of interest, as the County staff prepared it, not an independent consultant. Neighbors need to sue the County and challenge the validity of the reports and location.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • lives in Diamond SpringsJuly 08, 2013 - 5:58 pm

    unfortunately it always seems to be this way in Diamond Springs, and I hope our new Supervisor will support finding another spot for the shelter. The proposal was really bad, with no consideration as to it being the wrong spot. It's just like with the proposed moving of the dump a few years ago. The COunty wants something cheap and fast, and no consideration given to the fact that it is the wrong spot. It also violates the zoning laws that say all the smell and flies and things have to stay within the confines of the facility. That's what they must do in order to force in this property without a special use permit. How are they going to do that? Simple---they won't. Now the people opposed to the shelter in this spot are being painted as animal haters, which is definitely not so. They are people who want our money spent wisely and not on some stupid, badly done project with apparently some really dumb people writing it. And the lawsuits will fly..some are already being proposed and attorneys have been contacted.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JimBoJuly 08, 2013 - 10:05 pm

    Our Supervisor Brian Veerkamp doesn't give a sheet. He also flip flopped on the Mental Health Dept. moving to the Logan Building after saying he would never vote for the Logan Building. Money and Payola seems to work.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • taxpayerJuly 09, 2013 - 6:06 am

    It's not nice to say "No" to significant campaign contributors. They may be needed the 2nd and 3rd times around.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynJuly 31, 2013 - 6:36 am

    Scott Kingston with Ethan Conrad Properties, Inc. got a commission of $90,520 for doing this deal.

    Reply | Report abusive comment


EDH Fire Dept. annexing Latrobe

By Noel Stack | From Page: A1, 9 Comments

Motorcycle fatality in Greenwood

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1

Greenwood School being restored

By Rebecca Murphy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Cal Fire increasing staffing, hiring

By Cal Fire | From Page: B1

EID restricts watering days

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A1, 13 Comments

Lover’s Leap fall injures man

By Tahoe Tribune | From Page: A1

Tea Party meeting April 17

By Tea Party Patriots Of El Dorado Hills | From Page: A3, 73 Comments

Town Hall Meeting on Underage Drinking May 1

By El Dorado Hills Community Vision Coalition | From Page: A6

Floating body not a body

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A7

Old mill a goner

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A11, 18 Comments | Gallery



Murder? Suicide?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 8 Comments

‘Drive Clean’

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 23 Comments

Middle class getting poorer?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 54 Comments

Real estate lies

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 16 Comments

A great big thanks

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5



Ponderosa volleyball is a family affair

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Aussie team makes visit

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A8

Griz have challenging day

By Mike Bush | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Outside with Charlie: Switch gear

By Charlie Ferris | From Page: A8

Roundup: April 15, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A9 | Gallery



At a glance: Take aim on fun

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2

Men to walk a mile in her shoes

By Center For Violence-Free Relationships | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Runners stampede for Sugarloaf scholarships

By El Dorado County Office of Education | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Team works to fight disease

By Placerville Kiwanis | From Page: B3

COOL School is accepting applications

By Rescue Union | From Page: B4

Band of Miwoks fund mission

By Shingle Springs Band Of Miwok Indians | From Page: B12



Crime Log: March 25-27

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

Weather stats 4-15-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2



Numa Edward “Ed” Roberts

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Ronald Russell Rohrer

By Contributor | From Page: A2, 2 Comments


Real Estate



New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10

Horoscope, Thursday, April 17, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Horoscope, Wednesday, April 16, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10

Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10