A man appealing his conviction of of accepting sexual favors in lieu of half of a bail bond had his hearings continued Friday, but may be facing a possible violation of probation.
Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
Judge Daniel B. Proud noted that the hearing was meant to check the status of the appeal. He noted the sentencing was done in April — 120 days straight time in jail reduced to 60 days pending completion of probation — and that an opening brief had been filed on Sept. 25.
Prosecutor Trish Kelliher said the case had “erroneously been sent to the 3rd District Court (of Appeals) like a felony case” but, being that it was a misdemeanor case, was sent back. Still, the case was on schedule, she said.
She then noted that Waters had been arrested “in the last few days” on a similar crime — allegedly soliciting prostitution. It was possible they would be back sooner than whatever date the status check hearing was set for in order to hold a violation of probation hearing, she said.
With briefs concerning the appeal due on Nov. 14, Proud scheduled a new hearing for Dec. 13 at 8:30 a.m.
Sacramento County records indicate that a case with Waters as the defendant was dismissed after a conviction in 1995 on a solicitation of prostitution charge. The trial on the current case concluded in January.