Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Big Cut Mine case: DA, defense at loggerheads over discovery

From page A1 | October 31, 2012 |

Attorneys William Brewer and Glenn Peterson appeared in place of their clients, Joseph Hardesty and Richard Churches, respectively, in a lengthy hearing last Wednesday morning regarding issues of withdrawing the not guilty plea of both men and discovery from the District Attorney’s Office.

The hearing, presided over by visiting Judge Carl F. Bryan II, began with Bryan noting that he had received both sides’ arguments regarding the issues, as well as the reply to the prosecution’s argument.

Brewer declared he had made a motion to withdraw Hardesty’s plea. He said that, after a refiling of the complaint and a second amended complaint, the DA’s Office had not returned discovery and he and Peterson were at a loss for what the actual charges against their clients are. They had sent inquiries to official agencies, who refused to give documents, citing they were on the prosecution’s team. Hardesty had been promised warrants, discovery and more following his arrest, as well as being released on his own recognizance, but none of that had happened and he had to pay bail, Brewer said.

“Our only choice is to withdraw and demur,” Brewer said, meaning he would delay proceedings and object until he received what was needed. He said that the defense had to demur in order to understand the charges. “We can’t prepare a defense unless we know what he is charged with,” Brewer said on Hardesty.

Peterson then asked the judge for additional time before a plea was made. “We assumed the pleading would be clarified in the discovery,” he said. He¬†explained that the charges do not define what hazardous waste or hazardous materials had been found and that the discovery “has not helped us one iota.”

Prosecutor Mike Pizzuti argued that the defense had time “at several stages” in the case prior to the upcoming preliminary to demur.

The judge agreed, and said he was “concerned” about the timeliness of the motions. “It seems late in the game to raise the demur,” Bryan said. He said he did, however, appreciate the counsel’s position.

All they had from the charges, Brewer again stressed, was that their clients had stored and disposed of hazardous waste, but that was as specific as they had. He said that to have the trial now would make it a “trial by ambush” and that it “shouldn’t be that big of a deal” for the prosecution to provide the proper discovery.

When asked for his view on the matter, Pizzuti said that the prosecution had a right to proceed to trial and that it was “quite disingenuous to call it a trial by ambush.” He said he motions were “just trying to draw out the case” and that they were “an attempt to further continue” the hearings.

Bryan noted the preliminary hearing was still set for Nov. 29 before calling for a recess to take other short cases and decide on a ruling.

After the recess, Bryan said he would allow Hardesty and Churches to withdraw their pleas. But, he overruled the demurer, the objection, saying that there was “sufficient information in pleading” for the attorneys to understand the charges.

Brewer said he as “in shock” when asked to respond, and the judge replied he was “sure at the preliminary there will be more information” and that it would all be addressed at the prelim. Brewer said he would withdraw the request to withdraw the pleas.

On the matter of compelling the DA’s Office to provide discovery, Brewer again requested the materials. He said that the defense “still did not have discovery we believe is relevant to the case,” nor a list of witnesses.

Pizzuti replied that what the two attorneys were asking for was outside the scope of what the prosecution could be compelled to give. He noted that he has worked informally with a member of Brewer’s firm in trying to deliver documents, but a “motion to compel is premature at this point” as he only has to provide material 30 days before trial. He said that the DA’s Office had already provided thousands of pages of material to the defense. Pizzuti reiterated that the breadth of the material asked for was not in the court’s power to compel.

The defense replied that they would file motions after the pre-trial hearings to compel the discovery be delivered before the 30 days. Brewer noted that it would be needed as one of the goals was to use the discovery to impeach one of the prosecution’s witnesses.

Bryan announced he would be going into recess again to decide on the matter. Upon returning, he announced that the prosecution’s “position is correct” and he would only issue an order requiring Pizzuti to provide a list of discovery and witnesses that would be used in the prelim and must be delivered to Brewer and Peterson by Nov. 5.

The hearing drew to a close with Brewer saying it was his intention to file a suppression motion and that he asked the court, in light of that, to reconsider its decision.

Bryan instead reaffirmed the prelim date of Nov. 29.





Heard over the back fence: Attorney to warn about scams

By Bob Billingsley | From Page: B1

Road zone of benefit protester reaches dead end

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Six file for Dist. 2

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1

District 2 candidates forum Aug. 14

By News Release | From Page: B1

EID ditch customers get relief

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A1

Veterans receive wildland fire training

By News Release | From Page: B1

Market data open for local biz

By Ross Branch | From Page: B1

Volunteers clean up national forest

By News Release | From Page: A3 | Gallery



My turn: Special interests at EID

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A4

Russian metastasis

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4

The Democratic-Chronicles: Not invented here

By Gene Altshuler | From Page: A4



EID and Dale Coco

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

DA hogging Main St. parking

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

CAO and staff hiring friends

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Altshuler’s hypocrisy

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Small Farm compromise

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5



Celebrity golf at Tahoe

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Roundup: July 22, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6

Dolphins ring up another title

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Sharks defeat Loomis Basin in season finale

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Dodgeball: Not the national pastime but …

By Shane Theodore | From Page: A7 | Gallery



At a glance: Comets to meteors

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2

Taste the best at the State Fair

By Democrat Staff | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Tractor Supply Store recognized

By Uc Cooperative | From Page: B3

Amador Fair honors cowboys

By Amador County Fair | From Page: B3

Arbor Day book helps to identify trees

By Arbor Day | From Page: B4

Learn about lavender and its many benefits

By Christian Women's Connection | From Page: B4

Lee’s Feed appreciates customers

By Democrat Staff | From Page: B5

My Time meeting in August

By Senior Day | From Page: B5

Builders’ Exchange honors scholars

By El Dorado Builders' Exchange | From Page: B5

En garde at Silver Screen Classic

By Auburn Silver Screen | From Page: B5



Weather stats 7-22-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2

Crime Log: July 8-10

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2



Arthur J. Funston

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Walter Vali

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Jean Lachelle Taylor

By Contributor | From Page: A2


Real Estate



Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8

Horoscope, Thursday, July 24, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Horoscope, Wednesday, July 23, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A8

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A8