<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPCSD takes up marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mtdemocrat.com/news/cpcsd-takes-up-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mtdemocrat.com/news/cpcsd-takes-up-marketing/</link>
	<description>California&#039;s Oldest Newspaper - Est. 1851</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:59:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Riordan</title>
		<link>http://www.mtdemocrat.com/news/cpcsd-takes-up-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-363903</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Riordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mtdemocrat.com/?p=257163#comment-363903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So we finally see a marketing plan from Cahill after a year and it is still vague in detailing “to whom and how the district facilities would be marketed?”. What part of marketing does she not understand?? . . . My opinion? Well, ALL facets from conception to implementation.  Then, I see that “The board voted to hold a workshop in January to develop the plan further???&quot; So we are paying Cahill to develop the plan that should have been FINISHED and in place six months ago.  She fails miserably and now THE BOARD is going to take over “developing the plan further”?  Help me understand . . . you hire her to do the job, she does not, and now YOU are going to “develop it further”.   Gees, Board think about how silly that sounds to a real marketing guy.  If you, the Board are going to finish it, then throw Cahill out and “git her done”!

With respect to a &quot;disclaimer&quot; for renters, if you ever find any, I believe what you need is called a &quot;Covenant not to sue&quot;  They are straight forward and should, in my opinion, be used in all rental agreements for use of any part or program of the CPCSD facilities. Here is a sample provided to me for my use in &quot;flying activities&quot; when giving rides and was written by a dear friend and attorney whom in my opinion knows more about the law than &quot;Beagle-er&quot; EVER will know since his brain just lacks the capacity. If he was sitting there as usual, I laugh in his face that he did not mention this possibility to the board.  
I am not an attorney, however, here is a sample &quot;covenant not to sue&quot;: &quot;User/Renter  (name here)  hereby agrees with this Covenant not to sue, in its entirety and promises not to make any claim or commence any lawsuit against the CPCSD or any of the CPCSD’s employees, board members, contractors or temporary workers, or community members arising from the design, operation, rental or usage of (description of facility or activity or both).  The damages which could be sustained should (renters name) breach this covenant not to sue include attorney’s fees, costs, lost income, travel expenses, expert advice and assistance, and similar expenses typically incurred in the defense of legal actions.&quot; If you wish to have a real attorney review it for CPCSD use, try Bob Laurie, a local attorney who actually understands CPCSD issues better than, in my opinion, your current &quot;counsel&quot; (and I do use the term loosely here), EVER will. 

Addendum: Despite numerous requests to Board members and open requests to Cahill, I still have not received copies of “beagle-er’s” billing statements. So what do you have to hide?? Please consider this my last request before taking further action.
 
Congratulations Dave Wood on your new position. We really appreciate all of you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we finally see a marketing plan from Cahill after a year and it is still vague in detailing “to whom and how the district facilities would be marketed?”. What part of marketing does she not understand?? . . . My opinion? Well, ALL facets from conception to implementation.  Then, I see that “The board voted to hold a workshop in January to develop the plan further???&#8221; So we are paying Cahill to develop the plan that should have been FINISHED and in place six months ago.  She fails miserably and now THE BOARD is going to take over “developing the plan further”?  Help me understand . . . you hire her to do the job, she does not, and now YOU are going to “develop it further”.   Gees, Board think about how silly that sounds to a real marketing guy.  If you, the Board are going to finish it, then throw Cahill out and “git her done”!</p>
<p>With respect to a &#8220;disclaimer&#8221; for renters, if you ever find any, I believe what you need is called a &#8220;Covenant not to sue&#8221;  They are straight forward and should, in my opinion, be used in all rental agreements for use of any part or program of the CPCSD facilities. Here is a sample provided to me for my use in &#8220;flying activities&#8221; when giving rides and was written by a dear friend and attorney whom in my opinion knows more about the law than &#8220;Beagle-er&#8221; EVER will know since his brain just lacks the capacity. If he was sitting there as usual, I laugh in his face that he did not mention this possibility to the board.<br />
I am not an attorney, however, here is a sample &#8220;covenant not to sue&#8221;: &#8220;User/Renter  (name here)  hereby agrees with this Covenant not to sue, in its entirety and promises not to make any claim or commence any lawsuit against the CPCSD or any of the CPCSD’s employees, board members, contractors or temporary workers, or community members arising from the design, operation, rental or usage of (description of facility or activity or both).  The damages which could be sustained should (renters name) breach this covenant not to sue include attorney’s fees, costs, lost income, travel expenses, expert advice and assistance, and similar expenses typically incurred in the defense of legal actions.&#8221; If you wish to have a real attorney review it for CPCSD use, try Bob Laurie, a local attorney who actually understands CPCSD issues better than, in my opinion, your current &#8220;counsel&#8221; (and I do use the term loosely here), EVER will. </p>
<p>Addendum: Despite numerous requests to Board members and open requests to Cahill, I still have not received copies of “beagle-er’s” billing statements. So what do you have to hide?? Please consider this my last request before taking further action.</p>
<p>Congratulations Dave Wood on your new position. We really appreciate all of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.mtdemocrat.com/news/cpcsd-takes-up-marketing/feed/ ) in 0.20806 seconds, on May 24th, 2013 at 6:53 pm PDT. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 24th, 2013 at 7:53 pm PDT -->