
READY TO RULE — El Dorado Superior Court Judge Steven C. Bailey, left, listens as Judge Warren "Curt" Stracener speaks in front of those gathered for the June 21 ribbon cutting of the new Department 8 courtroom. Stracener will hear juvenile and traffic legal matters at the refurbished county facility. Democrat photo by Krysten Kellum --
El Dorado County celebrated the opening of a new courthouse Thursday afternoon.
After El Dorado County Superior Court Judges Steven C. Bailey, Warren “Curt” Stracener, James R. Wagoner and Douglas C. Phimister cut the ribbon on the new Department 8 courthouse, the 30 or so audience members were ushered into the new courtroom.
Presiding Judge Bailey began by welcoming the audience, made mostly of members of the legal system including lawyers and probation officers, to the remodeled building. He introduced newly elected District 1 Supervisor Ron “Mik” Mikulaco, who would be the go-between for probation and the courts before introducing his fellow judges.
He then explained that converting the building to a courtroom was easier said than done.
“Getting these done … isn’t something that just happened,” Bailey said. “Many of us may still have been in diapers when this started. We’ve needed this for years and years and years.”
The project to remodel the building, located under juvenile hall, began in 2007 after Chief Probation Officer Greg Sly agreed to vacate the space. Space in Lake Tahoe was traded to accomplish the deal.
Bailey pointed out a major selling point of the new location: “It’s self-contained, right under Juvenile Hall.” He pointed to a door leading from the side of the courtroom to an elevator, which would bring juveniles down for court cases. “Now, they will not be paraded in front of the public. Nothing could be better.”
Judge Stracener, who said he would almost “exclusively” use the courtroom as he handles most juvenile delinquency and dependency cases, said, “When I came to the bench, I was told … there would be a new courthouse in four or five months, in April of May.” Stracener, who will also continue to take traffic cases, took the bench more than a year and a half ago. “We worked with the Department of General Services and the State Architect to make it happen,” he said.
He joked that a pool had been set up trying to guess when the courtroom would be completed. He had chosen sometime this year.
“I’m really pleased … it came together,” he said. “I used to carry a library in my truck.” He said he would need a folder or book that would be in the Main Street Courthouse while in the Government Building C Courthouse and vice versa. “Now, it’s going to be one home.”
He was also pleased to have his own staff, having mostly borrowed staff from other judges since he started. “It’s my team, our team, all together. I’m looking forward to the Christmas parties, the Halloween parties, the other parties. But not too many parties, though,” he joked. “I’m really looking forward to it.”
Bailey took over, praising Wagoner as his predecessor as presiding judge, saying Wagoner’s “experience and ability” made the court system of the county “what it is today.”
After the speeches were made, Stracener took a seat at his new bench, noting that originally, the bar surrounding his desk had been built too high, but within a week, it was completely fixed. “It was within a week, I thought it would be months,” he said.
Overall, he was pleased with the new courtroom, painted in a light beige with wood in lighter colors, which, combined with large windows behind the judge’s bench, made for a bright courtroom. It also featured large desks for defense and prosecution, and two long benches in the back of the room for audience members.
“It’s great. It’s a terrific asset to the county,” he said. “It’s going to really improve the overall efficiency. At Main Street, kids have to be housed in the entranceway before mediation, and they’d have to seal that off. Now, if they are in custody, they can just come through the back, come in the courtroom,” he said, pointing again to the door leading to Juvenile Hall.
He noted the decor was “a little bit more inviting” for younger people in court. “For dependency, those kids haven’t committed crimes. It’s more inviting for them,” Stracener said. “Department 5 has dark mahogany, it’s a traditional courtroom. This looks like a traditional courtroom, but it’s more inviting.”
The Mountain Democrat does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy
Watchful EyesJune 25, 2012 - 1:52 pm
The picture attached to this article shows Judge Stracener and his supporting judge, Bailey. Seems the only ones missing are Dan Dellanger, and his GOB contingent. Take notice of the Tahoe Daily Tribune online today and see how Judge Stracener has now aligned himself firmly with the GOB's. The Tribune article outlines Grand jury interference, illegal acts by Dellanger mis-using public funds from the Pioneer Fire District, and so on. Judge Stracener has got himself tied up in some un-equivocal misconduct.
helpu seethetruthJune 25, 2012 - 6:52 pm
What are you talking about? I see no article in Lake Tahoe online news about Stracener, or Pioneer Fire Dept.or Dan Dellenger. Who is Dellenger? What is a GOB? Hello??????light's are on, but..... get it right before you let your fingers do the walking!D-to the ork...Dork
ConcernedJune 25, 2012 - 6:56 pm
So from a single picture of a well needed new courthouse that saves money you go to the Alarcon/Dellinger/Nutting et.al boys, far reaching. But they have nothing to do with each other and especially not the two Judges, check your facts. I wouldn't be surprised that the three said that they are but it isn't so.
VoterJune 25, 2012 - 6:59 pm
Boy are the Hoffman supporters trying hard to turn attention away from illegal activity by their boy. Well if that's all you have then it won't hold any merit, we are all talking about what is known not made up.
Chuck HollandJune 25, 2012 - 8:31 pm
How coincidental help, concerned and voter all post within minutes of each other, one after another. Besides having zero credibility for hiding behind fake names, it's all the same person. Or I guess it could be the Stacener Daisy chain?
Chuck HollandJune 25, 2012 - 8:58 pm
FYI Watchful Eyes, the Tahoe Tribune is incorrect. the article appears in the Lake Tahoe News. http://www.laketahoenews.net/2012/06/el-dorado-county-judge-tied-to-firm-grand-jury-investigated/ happy reading.
Ken SteersJune 25, 2012 - 9:18 pm
Chuck, Did I read this right? The Grand Jury was afraid of being sued for liable and slander? What am I missing here?
helpu seethetruthJune 25, 2012 - 9:35 pm
Why can't you all just let a good day pass. What does this really have to do with new courtroom and Judge Stracener. Seems to me many good people have used Dellinger's services. Are you going to go back as far as "milk money" from elementary school days next? I have never heard such disrespect for a judge. Damn, give the readers a frick'in break !
Chuck HollandJune 26, 2012 - 6:06 am
Ken, it would appear they may have been led to believe they could be sued. The question is, by whom? In California a county is required to provide indemnification and defense for grand jurors sued for statements made within the scope of their reporting duties that are contained in a final grand jury report.County grand jurors are employees of the county as defined in Government Code section 810.2. The end product of a grand jury's watchdog activity is a final report that contains the findings and recommendations on subjects of its investigations. The grand jury's final report may contain alleged defamatory statements against named individuals who would have the right to sue the grand jurors for defamation. The county is required to provide indemnification and defense for grand jurors sued for statements made within the scope of their reporting duties that are contained in a final grand jury report.
Look AroundJune 26, 2012 - 7:13 pm
Let's see if the new courthouse really works and not attack the people who work there, it just might work even with an appointed Judge on the bench.