Wednesday, April 16, 2014
PLACERVILLE, CALIFORNIA
99 CENTS

GDPUD delays ALT project

By
From page A1 | February 15, 2013 | 5 Comments

It was standing room only as residents sat through the Feb. 12 board meeting of the Georgetown Divide Public Utility District. A meeting that dragged on for well over six hours.

Putting off the most important decision on the agenda, Board President Bonnie McLane, along with Directors Kathy Otermat and Maria Capraun, voted to delay putting out to bid the plans for the Auburn Lake Trails Water Treatment Plant retrofit with Directors Norm Krizl and Ray Griffiths voting no.

With plans for the plant 100 percent complete, General Manager Hank White reported that the revised cost for the project was estimated at $9.3 million according to Psomas, the engineering firm that designed the plant.

White requested board approval to release the plans to the seven contractors who were previously pre-qualified to bid on the project.

Capraun questioned if the cost of the project could be pared back by eliminating what she called “bells and whistles.” However, Kelly Shively, assistant operations manager, said that while some additional items had been added to the project, including required fire suppression equipment, they had economized as much as possible including not removing the old structure to save money.

Capraun went on to insist she wanted a new budget for the project that included where the additional money would come from, given that the estimated cost had increased from $8.4 million to $9.3 million.

However, resident Ed Grout reminded the board if it didn’t move forward, it could lose grants and loans already approved for the project.

According to White, the district has received tentative approval for a USDA loan of $5 million, a Proposition 50 grant of $685,550, and between $1.1 million and $1.2 million from the Environmental Protection Agency for a total of almost $6.9 million toward the cost of the project. He said the board has until June to supply to the state both approval of the Proposition 50 grant and a bid from a contractor. September is the deadline to qualify for USDA and EPA funding.

Krizl urged the board to move ahead with the project, saying it would be delinquent to do otherwise. “Instead of pointing fingers, let’s come up with how to come up with the difference. Let’s do both,” he said. “Put the RFP (request for proposal) out to bid and look for additional money.” Krizl suggested that perhaps the USDA loan amount could be increased to pay for the difference. “Let’s get this thing built. If we keep putting this off, we’ll lose the $685,550 grant and then the whole thing will fall apart.”

However, a board member objected to increasing the USDA loan since it would mean increasing the surcharge on people’s water bills.

In the end, Krizl’s argument failed to sway McLane, Otermat and Capraun, who directed White to prepare a budget that includes where the additional funding will come from. A follow-up discussion may be scheduled at one of the board’s workshops.

In other actions, the board voted to approve accepting the $685,550 grant from the state, including informing them of the updated cost of the project.

It approved the district financial report. At the end of Dec. 31 operating expenses were at 47 percent of budget.

The board also voted to approve an RFP to hire a new general counsel with responses due by the end of March. The available contract will be advertised in local newspapers. Otermat inquired if she could send it to firms she was acquainted with, but interim counsel John Knowlton advised against it.

The board approved an investment policy for the district and voted to set up a public finance committee with the board treasurer serving as a liaison. Residents are encouraged to contact the district if interested in serving on it. Capraun suggested a finance policy be created along with the committee.

The hiring of a contractor to design a pipe relocation plan for the upcoming road construction at the intersection of Cat Bird Hill Lane and Highway 193 was approved. White estimated the design work will cost $10,000 and actual construction will be $40,000.

An interim agreement with Siren & Associates for consulting services was approved.

Capraun asked for revisions to a resolution approved last year recognizing the general manager’s authority to contract for services up to $10,000. She also asked White to furnish to the board a copy of any contracts he had approved.

This angered Krizl who commented, “This is micromanaging to the nth degree. This is your way of displaying your distrust of the general manager. And we complain about the federal bureaucracy!” The board then directed Knowlton and Capraun to work further on the resolution and to bring it back to the board.

A presentation on an online billing system, including the use of mobile devices for reading water meters, was made. However, it was pointed out that the new system might not integrate well with the district’s existing accounting software. The board asked White to schedule presentations by different software companies to explore the pros and cons of such a system.

McLane proposed holding two board meetings a month and switching to an evening meeting beginning in March. However, the latter suggestion was tabled since evening meetings were not slated to begin until April.

McLane said if extra board meetings were held, board members would receive no extra compensation. However, left unsettled was the additional cost of having legal counsel available.

Other board members suggested that additional workshops might be needed. The board has been conducting weekly workshops since January and those were slated to end this month.

As the board meeting entered its sixth hour, a move was made to shorten it by moving a variety of discussion items to a workshop. Those items included a discussion of the job responsibilities and salary range for a new business and finance manager; a PERS liability side fund; having El Dorado Irrigation District and El Dorado County handle the district’s accounts payable and human resource accounts; contracting with a part-time worker to run the treatment plants on weekends; and new policies governing document retention and general manager personnel file handling.

Reported out of close session was a decision by McLane, Otermat and Capraun to pay 50 percent of a claim by Jan Falkenstein for alleged damage to his property. At the January board meeting, Falkenstein submitted a claim for $791.24. He said a ditch, that overfilled during a storm, caused damage to his property. Griffiths voted no on the motion. Krizl was absent for the vote.

Contact Dawn Hodson at 530-344-5071 or dhodson@mtdemocrat.net. Follow @DHodsonMtDemo on Twitter.

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 5 comments

  • Maria CapraunFebruary 15, 2013 - 6:48 am

    The Auburn Lake Water Treatment Plant lack of budget preparation is a HUGE issue. How can a Board in its' right mine go forward with a project est. to be over $10 million based on the information provided at the meeting, without any idea of where the funds to pay for the project are coming from. At the workshop discussing the ALT Plant the GM was asked to present a budget for this project to plan for the contingency of cost over the original $8.4 million. The 100% plans came in at $9.2 million with the 10% for change orders (the plan only allowed for 3%) the est. cost is over $10 million. The rate payers will ultimately be affected by this project once again if this Board does not act responsibly. The Board was only provided with the cost of the project and no information on the funding has been provided as was requested. Reasoning for the $9.2 were extras added to the project like they did not know that a sprinkler system was required by the fire department, I question how many change orders are going to be needed? Where will the extra est. $1.8 million come from? For some more clarification, the General Manager provided no documentation of his authority to sign any contracts for the District. When questioned he said he could not find it and did not have time to look any further. The only document relating to the GM’s authority is the resolution passed in November of 2012 that was worded oddly. Clarification is needed to this document. I did not request any past contracts. The GM has the right as far as I am concerned to enter into contracts up to $10,000 for needed services or purchase of items for the District as long as the Board is provided a copy of the contract for informational purposes once signed by the GM.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • CoolFebruary 15, 2013 - 10:07 am

    10 % or so for possible change orders during the construction should have already be included in the consultants estimate. Lets just hope that the estimate is over-fluffed and that the actual bids from the contractors comes well below $9.3M. (This rarely happens). My question for the board is, what are we going to do if the bid prices from the contractors come at $10-13M? What is the plan then?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Dink LaneFebruary 15, 2013 - 11:01 am

    I thought Norm Krizl was a CONSERVATIVE.... He wants to spend money he doesn't have (The district is SHORT for the project BY... $1.5 million); He doesn't want to know WHY the $7 Million project now costs.... $2.5 Million MORE (Just build it, he says); He blocks paying court ordered costs that will run up thousands of $$$$ in legal fees AGAIN (He's done it twice before in his last term); and he even doubled the General manager's salary in 5 years without writing out a single paper saying WHY........ Who voted for this guy? Daniel Webster must have been looking right at NORM when he wrote "A Tax & Spend Politician." (And he says he's a conservative. Ha, Ha, Ha...)

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • SparkyFebruary 16, 2013 - 7:31 am

    This is all about reviewing past decisions and past history. The newly elected did not have their fingerprints on those decisions so it can not possibly be correct. Deferring the expenditure is certainly an alternative, but how long will the current configuration last and when do the fines kick in for having a substandard system. Whatever the cost, it will not cost less tomorrow, 6 months from now or 6 years from now. Grant money from Prop 50 will have more strings attached moving forward which diminishes the applied value of any future grant awards. Being newly elected is not a certification of economic prowess. The future for EID is proudly being previewed for their naysayers if they have their way. Best of luck....

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynFebruary 16, 2013 - 8:11 am

    Maria Capraun writes: "The Board was only provided with the cost of the project and no information on the funding has been provided as was requested." ********** Sparky, if this is true, does it matter? I've always understood that when obligating myself for significant expenditures it's prudent to know whether there are funds to meet the commitment. Further, are you suggesting that this is not part of EID's fiduciary responsibility?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
.

News

Motorcycle fatality in Greenwood

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1

 
Greenwood School being restored

By Rebecca Murphy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

 
Cal Fire increasing staffing, hiring

By Cal Fire | From Page: B1

EID restricts watering days

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A1, 13 Comments

 
Lover’s Leap fall injures man

By Tahoe Tribune | From Page: A1

EDH Fire Dept. annexing Latrobe

By Noel Stack | From Page: A1, 7 Comments

 
Tea Party meeting April 17

By Tea Party Patriots Of El Dorado Hills | From Page: A3, 62 Comments

 
Town Hall Meeting on Underage Drinking May 1

By El Dorado Hills Community Vision Coalition | From Page: A6

Floating body not a body

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A7

 
Old mill a goner

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A11, 18 Comments | Gallery

.

Letters

A great big thanks

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

 
Murder? Suicide?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 8 Comments

‘Drive Clean’

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 4 Comments

 
Middle class getting poorer?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 53 Comments

Real estate lies

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 14 Comments

 
.

Sports

Outside with Charlie: Switch gear

By Charlie Ferris | From Page: A8

 
Ponderosa volleyball is a family affair

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Aussie team makes visit

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A8

 
Griz have challenging day

By Mike Bush | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Roundup: April 15, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A9 | Gallery

 
.

Prospecting

Men to walk a mile in her shoes

By Center For Violence-Free Relationships | From Page: B2 | Gallery

 
Runners stampede for Sugarloaf scholarships

By El Dorado County Office of Education | From Page: B2 | Gallery

At a glance: Take aim on fun

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2

 
Team works to fight disease

By Placerville Kiwanis | From Page: B3

 
COOL School is accepting applications

By Rescue Union | From Page: B4

Band of Miwoks fund mission

By Shingle Springs Band Of Miwok Indians | From Page: B12

 
.

Essentials

Crime Log: March 25-27

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

 
Weather stats 4-15-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2

.

Obituaries

Numa Edward “Ed” Roberts

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
Ronald Russell Rohrer

By Contributor | From Page: A2, 2 Comments

.

Real Estate

.

Comics

Sudoku

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Shoe

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Rubes

By Contributor | From Page: A10

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Tundra

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Horoscope, Thursday, April 17, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Horoscope, Wednesday, April 16, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A10