Wednesday, April 16, 2014

GDPUD: New majority devoted to paperwork

From page A1 | March 15, 2013 | 9 Comments

Tuesday’s board meeting of the Georgetown Divide Public Utility District was long and rancorous, although it could have been much longer except for the absence of General Manager Hank White.

Out due to illness, board member Norm Krizl initially suggested postponing the meeting until White returned. Krizl went on to complain about the length of the agenda which numbered over 30 items including closed session topics. He wondered if the board would have another nine-hour board meeting, as it did last month, if time spent on closed session items was counted.

After discussion, the board voted to proceed with those items that didn’t require White’s input and to hold an additional meeting on another date once he returned. Put off were two of the most important agenda items: whether or not to put out to bid the building of the new water treatment plant at Auburn Lake Trails and what to do about the now-vacant position of business and finance manager.

The board then moved on to discussing the reams of paper generated during their workshops, with the longest and most heated discussion being about new board policies. Board member Maria Capraun presented the board with several different items for board approval, including an extensive number of revised or new policies she wanted sent to the district’s interim counsel, John Knowlton, for review.

Krizl jumped on that idea, saying that certain board members were constantly railing about deficits but now wanted to spend money having the district’s attorney review the policies. “This will cost tens of thousands of dollars,” he said. “This is process for process sake’s. The board has not directed that this be done and it will cost a fortune to do it.”

Capraun countered, saying it would only cost a few thousand dollars. “Everything is disorganized,” she claimed, saying that the board needed a “nice path to follow. We’re on a dirt road when it comes to how we handle minutes and agendas. It is not working and that’s why it needs to be completed.”

Board member Kathy Otermat added that in the past the board ran on history and tradition. “Instead of harping on the cost we should harp on how the district was run without policies,” she said.

Resident Dennis Goodenow disagreed with Otermat, saying that anyone who said the district didn’t have policies was wrong. He said he had received an extensive list of existing ordinances, policies and resolutions from White. He suggested making them more widely available and filling in where there were gaps. “This is a huge undertaking that is being done by people who are not knowledgable,” he added.

Resident Dale Miller jumped into the fray saying, “This is what happens when the board doesn’t have the policies it wants.”

Members of the public also questioned the cost of having counsel review the proposed policies at $225 an hour and then paying to have him to review them again once they are finalized. Krizl added, “This is crazy to review a policy the board hasn’t adopted. Unbelievable. Let’s just put an ATM machine in the lobby.”

Resident Ed Grout asked what would be the consequences if board members didn’t follow the policies they were developing for themselves.

Capraun said they were still working on that. “The whole idea is to organize the information,” she said.

Goodenow interjected once again that developing policies was a staff function and he didn’t think the board could do it and be successful, saying that it required a high level of skill and the board was not familiar enough with the day-to-day operations of the district to be able to do it. “Staff has the best idea of how to create a policy management tool,” he said. Goodenow suggested that the lack of a working relationship between the board and staff was the key problem. He suggested burying the hatchet and moving forward. He also noted that some of the proposed policies were poorly done and reflected badly on the community.

Otermat added that other boards have policies and procedures and said the intent was to fill in the gap.

Goodenow responded by saying that everything the board of directors is allowed to do is already codified in state law and reiterated that it was not the board’s job to come up with policies, it was the staff’s job.

The board then went on to approve adopting a table of contents for the policy manual with Otermat, Capraun and McLane voting yes and Krizl and Ray Griffiths voting no.

Capraun then motioned to forward four different policies to counsel for review. However, Griffiths objected, saying that he wasn’t going to vote to forward policies to counsel when he didn’t have a copy of the policy in front of him. “You’re asking us to vote on something we don’t have in front of us to see. You should have provided copies to us and the public,” he said. “It’s illegal to do that.”

Knowlton agreed with that objection and Capraun’s motion failed for lack of a second. The board also agreed to shortening the list of new policies to be sent for legal review since the original list included 21 policies.

In other actions, the date for the start of the irrigation season was set for May 1.

A revised resolution authorizing the general manager’s contracting authority was approved on a 3-2 vote, with Krizl and Griffiths voting no.

The board approved appointing Capraun to replace Otermat on the boards of the Joint Powers Insurance Authority and the El Dorado County Water Agency as Otermat said her job prevented her from attending. Griffiths voted no.

Rich Englefield was selected by the board as their first choice for the special district representative on LAFCO. Their second choice was Alan Day.

Board President Bonnie McLane reported that the workshops held in January and February went well. She thanked the public for their contributions and in particular the input of Dennis Goodenow, even though his input was largely ignored. She said the next workshops will focus on the budget.

McLane also brought up the subject of hiring someone part-time to serve as the board’s clerk.

Krizl reported on the past and upcoming activities of the Mountain Counties Water Resources Association board. At one point he said a friend told him that McLane and Capraun were overheard making negative comments about him at an El Dorado County Water Agency meeting, which his friend said were very unprofessional. “I don’t appreciate this,” said Krizl.

Capraun reported that five people had volunteered for the public Finance Committee. She ticked off a list of items they could tackle including reviewing the budget, developing policies, and reviewing salary surveys, including those for the general manager.

Krizl said the committee should not be developing a budget or developing personnel policies. He recommended the job of the Finance Committee be defined before they hold their first meeting.

Capraun also reported she had come up with a different job title and job description for the business and finance manager and asked the board to review it and decide if the district needed an office manager rather than a business and finance manager.

Krizl objected, saying that the person reports to the general manager. “Talk about micromanaging. We’re getting way off into the weeds,” he said. “This person’s tasks should be laid out by the general manager, not a finance committee. We’re taking everything away from the general manager and then telling him, this is what you have to do. Soon we’ll be telling them how many scoops to put in the coffee machine.”

The board adjourned with no date set for an additional meeting to take up those agenda items that require the presence of the general manager.

The next regular board meeting will be in the evening. It will be held April 9 at 5 p.m. at district headquarters.

Contact Dawn Hodson at 530-344-5071 or Follow @DHodsonMtDemo on Twitter.


Discussion | 9 comments

  • Captain ObviousMarch 14, 2013 - 10:16 pm

    Kind of new here, but does the author work at the Georgetown Divide PUD? This seems like an article from someone that is not presenting a well balanced article. If this is an editorial and I missed it, I apologize. That aside, what is concerning from what I am reading here is first that there are 30 issues that need to be covered and then secondly that it appears that some of the board have no interest in taking the time to resolve them. I have seen this before and unfortunately it reeks of either laziness by those not wanting to fix the issues or more likely may point to a cover up of actual issues. A board of directors, especially in a public district, is paid to fix problems, not bury them. I mean come on, one board member is 'out sick' but we somehow have a 2 page explanation of his position and another member is using thinly veiled legal position, which I myself know as wrong. For a first time observer, as a past auditor, I'd be all over this district as something 'smells' here and it's not the sewage. I'll be tracking this very closely and am interested to see exactly what the community involvement, as well as that of this newspaper, are doing in support of this. I didn't move in an area that operates like the mob. The issue all seem valid. Lastly, if this isn't an opinion article, what does this newspaper get out of this spin? I don't get it.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Dear Captain ObviousMarch 15, 2013 - 5:48 am

    Dear Captain Obvious, as a newcomer to District issues you will find that the Mountain Democrat is the National Enquirer type press for the area. They bend the truth to promote discourse. Most people already are aware of this. Let’s face it Dawn is infatuated with Krizl and no true judge of any issue at this District. Dawn did not report on the true issues at the District like the Auburn Lake Trails water treatment plant is over budget at an estimated cost of $10.7 million, this was not discussed because the board needs to know what happened and how is the District going to pay for a plant that was estimated only months ago at $8.4 million. This was included in the board packet available online. Do I hear GREENWOOD LAKE WTP once again; the plan is more than the funding available? The rate payers once again cannot afford this project. Does the General Manager at GDPUD get a clue. Oh, that is right we still are paying for the Greenwood Lake Treatment Plant. …. I think you covered this with the statement of “cover up”. The big problem is this new treatment plant is poorly managed by the GM. When asking for information on this budget for the project the Board has been stonewalled by the GM with inadequate information. I bet the GM is going to throw this at the Board and tell them to come up with the funding and not take any blame for the project failure. Get ready for the ride, it’s downhill so hold on tight.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Dink LaneMarch 17, 2013 - 3:24 pm

    Norm Krizl is upset about having to work so long?.... He's use to those District PAID lunches after the meetings.... He didn't do anything on the past 2-terms.... Now he has to work... :-(

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Captain ObviousMarch 22, 2013 - 1:38 pm

    OK, looks like my last question didn't take. Anyhow, it seems that there is quite a bit of distrust in this newspaper which I find interesting given it's such a small community. You'd think people would be honest; interesting introduction to this aspect of the area. In any event, I'd like to get a better understanding of this from the author. Ms. Hodson, I would think you'd read your feedback - is there a time I could give you a quick call to discuss? Or, if not, can you please direct me to whomever the newspaper usually does for public inquiries? Thanks much.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Dawn HodsonMarch 22, 2013 - 1:48 pm

    Dear Capt. Obvious, I tried emailing you but your email address is false. You can contact me or the Editor at our office any time.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampMarch 22, 2013 - 1:56 pm

    Captain Obvious If you actually do wish to interact with Ms Hodson - - - email - Dawn Hodson, Staff writer

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • James E.March 22, 2013 - 3:02 pm

    False email addresses in El Dorado County, the most honest county in California?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynMarch 22, 2013 - 3:37 pm

    Dawn: Regarding email addresses, though not published they are given out by the Mt Dem. On several occasions the paper has forwarded my emails (along with my email address) to others. Fact, not guess work. Please state the Mt. Dem's policy guidelines for giving out Commenters' email addresses. Alternatively, tell us where the policy can be found. Thank you. Evelyn Veerkamp

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Captain ObviousApril 07, 2013 - 2:21 pm

    Ms. Hodson, I appreciate you attempting to email me, but if you think I'll use my real email address on a website that has a) no privacy policy around email and b) appears to not be 100% honest in their dealings with the public, you're crazy. I've left you TWO voicemails now and not heard back...

    Reply | Report abusive comment


Greenwood School being restored

By Rebecca Murphy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Cal Fire increasing staffing, hiring

By Cal Fire | From Page: B1

EID restricts watering days

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A1, 9 Comments

Lover’s Leap fall injures man

By Tahoe Tribune | From Page: A1

EDH Fire Dept. annexing Latrobe

By Noel Stack | From Page: A1, 5 Comments

Motorcycle fatality in Greenwood

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1

Tea Party meeting April 17

By Tea Party Patriots Of El Dorado Hills | From Page: A3, 16 Comments

Town Hall Meeting on Underage Drinking May 1

By El Dorado Hills Community Vision Coalition | From Page: A6

Floating body not a body

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A7

Old mill a goner

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A11, 4 Comments | Gallery



My turn: A fair California flat income tax

By Mark Belden | From Page: A4

DA Pierson has been outstanding

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4, 8 Comments



A great big thanks

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Murder? Suicide?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 3 Comments

‘Drive Clean’

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 2 Comments

Middle class getting poorer?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 10 Comments

Real estate lies

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 1 Comment



Outside with Charlie: Switch gear

By Charlie Ferris | From Page: A8

Ponderosa volleyball is a family affair

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Aussie team makes visit

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A8

Griz have challenging day

By Mike Bush | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Roundup: April 15, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A9 | Gallery



Runners stampede for Sugarloaf scholarships

By El Dorado County Office of Education | From Page: B2 | Gallery

At a glance: Take aim on fun

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2

Men to walk a mile in her shoes

By Center For Violence-Free Relationships | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Team works to fight disease

By Placerville Kiwanis | From Page: B3

COOL School is accepting applications

By Rescue Union | From Page: B4

Band of Miwoks fund mission

By Shingle Springs Band Of Miwok Indians | From Page: B12



Crime Log: March 25-27

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

Weather stats 4-15-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2



Numa Edward “Ed” Roberts

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Ronald Russell Rohrer

By Contributor | From Page: A2


Real Estate




By Contributor | From Page: A10

Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10

Horoscope, Thursday, April 17, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Horoscope, Wednesday, April 16, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A10