Monday, April 21, 2014

Island annexation not happening … for now

From page A1 | February 20, 2013 | 1 Comment

Island annexation does not include a beach and a Corona. It’s a process by which property within city limits, but belonging to the county, is reclaimed by the city by annexation. It’s a lengthy process and one that the Placerville City Council, looking at too much opposition and too little benefit, decided to scrap at the Feb. 12 City Council meeting.

In 2009, the exceutive  director of the Local Agency Formation Commission made a presentation to the City Council about “island properties”— those small islands with illogical boundaries that are part of the county yet are within the city and surrounded by city property. The presentation spoke to a streamlined process for doing away with islands with total areas of less than 150 acres by making them part of the city to promote boundary efficiency and provision of services and to give residents a voice in the city.

One hundred and eight properties totaling 140 acres were identified for possible annexation in five areas: Andler Way, Panning Way, Cebu Street, Debbie Lane and Middletown Road. Strong Andler Way resident opposition to annexation got that area removed from consideration and properties on Texerna Court were added.

Public workshops were organized to answer questions such as whether annexation would force residents to connect to city water and sewer (no), to  have mandatory garbage services (yes), affect property tax rates (no), give up animals allowed by the county (no).

At the meeting, city staff asked for direction about whether to continue to the next step of the annexation process, submission of a preliminary application to LAFCO. The six-to nine-month process would then include a formal application to LAFCO for their analysis and decision, accompanied by a fee, and possible environmental documents, the cost of which would be borne by the city. The streamlined process to approve island annexation without requiring protest proceedings or popular vote ends January 2014.

Benefits of annexation to the city are clearer delineation of city borders, a greater share of property tax revenue for the city and a greater consistency of land use and regulations.
“The property tax redistribution is the only real benefit for the city and it would only be about $5,000 to 7,000 a year,” said City Manager Cleve Morris.

Benefits to the residents would include police services (currently served by both county and city) and governance by the City Council.

Public input, from previous City Council discussions of island annexation and from a Neighborhood Chat on Jan. 29 where island annexation was the topic, has been mixed said Development Services Director Michael Webb — either neutral or negative. No one stepped forth in support of annexation, but plenty of residents of the neighborhoods in question spoke to the lack of any appreciable benefit to being part of the city.

Judy Madison, a Panning Way resident said, “I see no benefit for the city or for us and I’ve yet to talk to any of us who want this.”

Norton Freeland presented a petition signed by all property owners on Prescott Street in opposition to annexation and residents of Cebu Lane, Debbie Lane and Stone Lane also voiced opposition at the meeting.

“This annexation idea has been around for a long time and it pops up from time to time,” said Councilwoman Patty Borelli. “We’re not trying to shove this down people’s throats. This process is an expense for the city and we don’t have the money for it.”

“I’m not sure we need to spend more money on this with the opposition we’re hearing,” said Vice Mayor Carl Hagen.

“There are no supporters and no real benefit,” said Mayor Wendy Mattson. Both Councilwomen Carol Patton and Trisha Wilkins also indicated a lack of benefit and acknowledged resident opposition.

The council voted 5-0 to cease exploring island annexation at the current time, but directed staff to maintain maps of potential annexation areas for future consideration.

Contact Wendy Schultz at 530 344-5069 or Follow @wschultzMtDemo on Twitter.


Discussion | 1 comment

  • EvelynFebruary 21, 2013 - 6:48 am

    None of the residents who spoke during public comment considered the possibility of governance by City Council to be a "benefit". Two questions: (1) Who would be the REAL beneficiaries of island annexation? (2) How long before the redrawing of City boundaries is back on the Agenda?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Recent Posts

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • .


    Air quality rating up in the air

    By Chris Daley | From Page: A1

    GDPUD: Budget and GM are top topics

    By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1, 1 Comment

    Mountain lion seen in Placerville

    By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1, 4 Comments

    CTE a pathway to higher wages, higher-demand jobs

    By Wendy Schultz | From Page: A1

    Heard over the back fence: Earth Day at the library

    By Bob Billingsley | From Page: B1

    New top 10 fugitive could be in area

    By News Release | From Page: A3

    Community Action Council seeks new member

    By Health and Human Services Agency | From Page: A3

    Rattlesnake Avoidance Clinics May 3-4

    By Hangtown Kennel | From Page: A9



    Belltower: El Niño or el nada?

    By Michael Raffety | From Page: A4 | Gallery

    The balancing act: Save the whales

    By Larry Weitzman | From Page: A4

    Retain Joe Harn as auditor

    By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4, 10 Comments



    Tell the truth, don’t confuse voters

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

    Local petitions circulating

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 6 Comments

    Chess club

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

    True Christian

    By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5



    Sports Scene: April 20, 2014

    By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6

    All Star team shows competive balance

    By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A6

    Australian rugby team visits Cameron park

    By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6 | Gallery

    Roundup: Cougars drop finale

    By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6

    Red hot Rico Abreu blazes to victory

    By Gary Thomas | From Page: A6

    Schedule: April 21-26, 2014

    By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6

    Rains to present at AMA conference

    By David Albee | From Page: A7



    Spend time in River City

    By Wendy Schultz | From Page: B2 | Gallery

    As we were: Supervisors can’t decide

    By Ken Deibert | From Page: B2

    Cantare Chorale seeks new director

    By Cantare Chorale | From Page: B3

    Help with healthcare decisions

    By Snowline Hospice Thrift Stores | From Page: B3

    Time to enter El Dorado County Fair

    By El Dorado County Fair | From Page: B3

    Volunteers needed for day of service

    By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B10



    DUI Log: Feb. 28-April 3

    By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

    Lake levels 4-17-14

    By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2



    Dianne Johnson

    By Contributor | From Page: A2

    Michael R. Sponsler

    By Contributor | From Page: A2

    Daniel Bish Sr. funeral notice

    By Contributor | From Page: A2


    Real Estate




    By Contributor | From Page: A8


    By Contributor | From Page: A8

    American Profile Crossword

    By Contributor | From Page: A8


    By Contributor | From Page: A8

    New York Times Crossword

    By Contributor | From Page: A8

    Horoscope, Tuesday, April 22, 2014

    By Contributor | From Page: A8

    Horoscope, Monday, April 21, 2014

    By Contributor | From Page: A8

    TV Listings

    By Contributor | From Page: A8

    Speed Bump

    By Contributor | From Page: A8


    By Contributor | From Page: A8