Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Land-use policy changes under way

From page A3 | April 16, 2012 | 1 Comment

Assistant Chief Administrative Officer Kim Kerr, backed by a team of county managers and planners, has been explaining a wide-reaching package of land-use policy updates, first unveiled last month in El Dorado Hills.

The “policy program update” package features a long-awaited overhaul to the county zoning ordinance, aligning zoning with land-uses specified in the General Plan. Kerr said she hopes to get the final environmental impact report  certified and zoning ordinance complete by February of 2013.

Roughly 80 residents turned out in El Dorado Hills. Many were concerned about growth. Several spoke out against specific proposed projects in their neighborhood.

The package includes a companion General Plan amendment that attempts, among other things, to stem the flow of sales tax dollars over the county line, a phenomenon called “sales tax leakage,” and reduces barriers to job creation by easing restrictions on commercial development and includes policies that encourage the construction of moderate-priced homes.

Work on both of the sprawling policy updates has been under way for years. Both will require a full EIR.

The package also includes compliance with the 2013 Housing Element Update, the county’s routine five-year confirmation —soon to be eight, if Senior Planner Shawna Purvines can once again convince state housing overlords that the county has enough land in high-density categories to meet state-specified affordability requirements.

Measuring and mitigating traffic impacts is essential to the proposed policy updates, but DOT’s traffic modeling software is outdated and no longer supported by the vendor. A new software package that factors in population and socio-economic factors and relies on the county’s Geographic Information System to more accurately predict the roadway impact of proposed new projects is also included in the update. Importantly, the new software can be used by DOT staff, whereas the current package requires a consultant.

Kerr promised to return at regular intervals during the approval process, with formal public hearings at the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors as each policy update approaches the finish line.

Project history
In November of 2011, the board wrapped up a five-year General Plan review, concluding that the plan’s concepts, strategies, projections, objectives and land uses remained valid, but that  a “course correction,” was in order, in light of the county’s poor performance in job creation, sales tax leakage and moderate-priced housing construction.

They asked the CAO’s office to lead an advisory team that includes DOT staff and the board’s workhorse Economic Development Advisory Committee, which has spent thousands of hours studying the issues.

The update package contains key land -use reforms that have been approved in principal by the board, but require a General Plan amendment and EIR, both of which are time-consuming and expensive.

El Dorado Hills residents repeatedly questioned the county’s approval of commercial and residential projects, questioning why more roadway improvements weren’t included.

One resident asked why the county can’t simply ban all new development. Another repeatedly questioned the board’s job creation goal, saying, “Most of us work in Sacramento or Santa Clara and like it that way.”

Attendees more familiar with the county development process worried that bringing the zoning ordinance into compliance with the general plan land-uses would remove constraints to development that are currently obstacles to the approval of high-density development projects in El Dorado Hills.

The El Dorado Hills meeting demonstrated a disconnect between west-county residents who feel the county is using them as the repository for dense development, with its steep permit fees, and county staff trying to figure out how to meet General Plan goals for housing, commercial development and job creation that the public seems unaware of, while complying with strict new state greenhouse gas initiatives that limit large projects to existing transportation corridors, numerous long-standing tree, wildlife and water protection statutes, and a lack of sewer service in rural portions of the county, including the communities east of Placerville.

Principal planner Peter Maurer reiterated the goals of the current amendments, a healthy mix of commercial and residential uses that create a vibrant self-sustaining local economy while protecting and enhancing the agricultural and natural resources in the county.

Purvines explained that current housing and population trends are on target to meet the General Plan targets, with a few exceptions. The economic realities of homebuilding have left the county short of targets for moderate-priced housing, which typically requires high density, but can also be met with mixed use projects, which are included in the amendment package.

Commercial development and job creation numbers are far short of General Plan goals, she said. The targeted amendment addresses policies that potentially constrain job creation, sales tax and moderate housing, while promoting and protecting agriculture and natural resources, including the expansion of agricultural district boundaries and the reclassification of Camino-Pollock Pines as a Rural Center.

Maurer explained that the last comprehensive zoning update was in the 1960s, and that the current zoning has numerous inconsistencies with the land uses outlined in the General Plan, which is a violation of state law.

The supervisors also asked for greater use of discretionary planning “overlays,” such as “historic” and “mixed use” that allow more flexible uses, but are subject to a stricter public and county approval processes.

Although many properties will be rezoned, Maurer said that zoning parcel size limits are being maintained wherever possible.

Development rights are preconditioned and thus locked in for projects with a “Specific Plan,” such as Serrano, Promontory, Blackstone and Town Center in El Dorado Hills.

The final EIR project description is targeted for April, which will kick off a 45-day public comment window, which includes at least one more round of public meetings.

The update has its own web site,

The General Plan predicts a 2025 population of 200,000 in the unincorporated portion of the county, which includes El Dorado Hills, but excludes Placerville and South Lake Tahoe. The 2010 census counted 149,266 people in that area, which means that the county must plan for another 50,000-plus residents in the next 13 years.


Discussion | 1 comment

  • Leslie DavisApril 17, 2012 - 4:47 pm

    You article looks benign in i'ts definition of mixing commercial and residential, increasing the tax base and adding more jobs. If one looks at the Kniesel Collision Center to open soon in Shingle Springs one can see where "easing restrictions on commercial development" will be a nightmare. Kniesel has no Toxic Waste Permit although they will be using toxic chemicals; they do not have an Air Quality permit although they will be venting paint and solvent toxins into our air; and they will most assuredly will violate the County Noise Ordinance with their metal cutting saws and pneumatic drills. The county has allowed this industrial business in an establishe neighborhood. This is not only bad planning, but illegal. Why can't this county do reasonable and legal development and why are the residents forced to live with the mess created by this outrageious type of commercial development?

    Reply | Report abusive comment


Herard over the back fence: Try fishing at Wakamatsu

By Bob Billingsley | From Page: B1

Downtown group coordinates painting, awnings

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: A1

More mountain lion sightings reported

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1, 8 Comments

Supervisor Nutting trial begins

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1, 100 Comments | Gallery

Sanford murder case to jury

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Gearing tax questions to correct office saves time

By Treasurer-Tax Collector | From Page: A3



Building restored

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4

Outstanding dog

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4

My turn: More than a buzzword

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A4, 63 Comments




By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 11 Comments

Altshuler framing

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 9 Comments

National Day of Prayer

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 5 Comments

‘Parents, be afraid’ letter

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 38 Comments

Ukranian situation

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 5 Comments



Outside with Charlie: Transitioning

By Charlie Ferris | From Page: A6

Pitching the ‘Root’ cause of Trojans’ victory

By Mike Bush | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Pedal power at the forefront next month

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Sports Scene: April 22, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A7

Roundup: April 22, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A7 | Gallery



4-H’ers star at showcase

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Authors to share their stories

By Pat Lakey | From Page: B2, 2 Comments

At a glance: Look for fireballs

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2, 1 Comment

Church to host human trafficking conference

By Pollock Pines | From Page: B3

Grow For It! Flower of Easter

By Barbara Schuchart | From Page: B5



Weather stats 4-22-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2

Building permits 4/7-11/2014

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2, 1 Comment

Crime Log: April 1-3

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2



Bobby Lloyd Bridges

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Harry Frank Harper

By Contributor | From Page: A2, 6 Comments

Marion “Wayne” Griswold

By Contributor | From Page: A2


Real Estate



Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A8

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8

Horoscope, Thursday, April 24, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Horoscope, Wednesday, April 23, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A8