Wednesday, April 16, 2014

‘Little Sluice’ restoration brings e-mail flood

Rubicon 1005

JEEPS make their way over the granite toward Rubicon Springs. Next year they will not have to detour around the Little Sluice. Democrat file photo by Krysten Kellum

From page A1 | October 05, 2012 | 8 Comments

Within the space of a few hours on Wednesday, Sept. 26, the Mountain Democrat had received well over 100 e-mails — copies of letters sent to each of the five members of the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors. Most in a similar format, the writers pleaded, asked politely, urged, cajoled and begged supervisors not to move ahead with planned maintenance on the Rubicon Trail scheduled for Friday, Sept. 28.

Many of the letters came from off-roading clubs and residents of Northern California, but a significant number were sent by folks from Utah, Georgia and parts in between. The following is representative both in tenor and style:

I am a resident of OHIO, but I come visit the Rubicon annually. We drive 39 hours one way to California just to recreate at the Rubicon and Fordyce Creek area and spend $1,500-2,000 locally every trip for fuel, food, groceries, lodging, and entertainment. There are a lot of other out-of-state residents who also travel to California for OHV recreation.

Please do not crack the large rocks in Little Sluice or the other areas slated for permanent destruction. Please do not fill Little Sluice with imported rock. I am still planning to travel to your area with my kids over the next couple of years to show them this pristine alpine recreation area. I doubt I’ll make the trip or invest in your local economy if the spectacular and beautiful challenging features are obliterated.

Describing the area called Little Sluice Box as “iconic” with national and international appeal to off-roaders, the writers generally tried to convince the board that the work was unnecessary and the modification to a small but treasured stretch of the trail would be irreversible as well as unforgivable.

The crux of the current matter goes back to the spring of 2009 when the county received a Clean-up and Abatement Order from the state’s Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Known in short as the CAO, the order directed the county and to a lesser extent the U.S. Forest Service to work together to clean up and abate a range of environmental threats along the Rubicon Trail.

The order further threatened the county with substantial financial penalties for failure to comply and included timelines within which certain mitigations would have to be completed.

Citing water pollution from dirt and sediment caused by traffic near streams and at popular fords across waterways, the CAO directed the county to reroute parts of the trail and reduce the direct movement of earth into the water. Bridge construction and repair are also part of the order.

Toxic fluids such as gasoline, oil and lubricants spilling from overturned or disabled vehicles were also listed as pollutants that need to be eliminated under the CAO.

Trail users now range from regular, street-legal 4x4s to specialized vehicles engineered for rock-crawling and “extreme” off-roading. The Little Sluice area has been modified over time to represent a significant challenge to drivers of the specialty machines. The family Jeep or 4×4 truck is incapable of running Little Sluice because of giant boulders that have been winched onto the right of way to increase the “extreme” challenge.

Consequently, the area has become a network of bypasses and detours outside of the traditional route and therefore an increased threat of pollution and environmental damage, according to the CAO.

In addition to water pollutants, the state described scenes of general environmental degradation, including human waste and toilet paper strewn along the trail, bottles and cans and trash of all kinds. Reports of drunkenness, discharge of firearms and rowdy behavior on the Rubicon had circulated for years as there had never been a  regular law enforcement presence on the route.

The Rubicon Trail has been a public road since the 1860s. Traveled by miners, timber concerns, rockhounds and tourists for decades, the trail became a four-wheeling destination after the 1950s. The Jeepers Jamboree, created at that time, spread the word to the nascent off-roading community, and the trail became the “Crown Jewel of Four-Wheeling.”

El Dorado County became the actual “owner” of the road after years of neglect, wrangling with the Forest Service and right-of-way uncertainties. A recent agreement with the Forest Service officially granted the county certain easements which allow local authority to regulate and maintain the approximately 22 miles of trail within its jurisdiction.

That agreement was generally necessary before the county could undertake significant efforts to comply with the CAO, and the work scheduled for last week was part of that larger project.

Vickie Sanders, administrative analyst with the county’s Chief Administrative Office, has been the staff person tasked with much of the “red tape” involved with the water board’s order. The county’s Department of Transportation is responsible for planning and carrying out the specific projects on the ground.

Sanders returned calls from the Mountain Democrat that day as the emails were piling up all over the county. She described the scheduled work as a combination of timing, weather and good luck. The latter referred to the unexpected availability of an Erickson Air-Crane, a super heavy-duty helicopter that can lift tons of material and complete work in a few hours that would take road crews up to two weeks or more.

The big chopper was scheduled to fly from its headquarters in Oregon to a job in Southern California, and Sanders explained that she and her team were able to get the machine detoured for two hours to work above  the Rubicon. The air-crane was used to haul tons of rock and gravel from other areas of the original trail to fill-in parts of the Little Sluice Box in accordance with the Cleanup and Abatement Order.

“We’re doing trail maintenance per the CAO,” Sanders explained. “We have to cover areas of soil that have been affected by oil from vehicles on the trail. It’s an environmental as well as a safety issue and complies with the CAO.”

Sanders acknowledged that she was somewhat perplexed by the flood of protest letters as she noted that the project has been on the books for more than two years and should not have been a surprise to any of the trail’s user community. The sense of urgency was only related to the sudden window of opportunity to use the air-crane that day, she said.

“We’re not trying to do this to oppose the user community, and we want to keep the challenge of the trail as best we can,” she said. “I hope they’re just venting, and we have high hopes that they’ll be satisfied with what we have to do. But we’re a little concerned and we’ll have backup from law enforcement.”

Despite the avalanche of e-mails and earlier concerns about potential conflict at the site, Sanders reported via e-mail Tuesday that the project “went off without a hitch,” and there were no “protesters” on the scene.

It was anticipated that the helicopter would be able to make eight “drops” of up to eight tons each, Sanders said. Then crews from DOT  would spend several days spreading the new rock around the area and use a “boulder buster” to blast some of the largest rocks into two or three smaller pieces.

She repeated that soil, safety and environmental issues are driving the overall effort and “not in any way, shape or form meant to anger anyone or be adversarial to trail users.”

John Arenz, vice president of the Rubicon Trail Foundation and a life-long four-wheeler, has been involved with the issue for years. The foundation has maintained an agenda of realistic compromise with the county and is most adamantly opposed to any outright closure of the trail.

“We have concerns,” Arenz admitted. “No matter what you do, some people and groups are not going to like it. We don’t represent the wishes of all the trail users, and there are legitimate ‘wheelers’ who vehemently disagree over how the trail should look.”

His group was part of ongoing negotiations that resulted in the withdrawal of lawsuits that could have led to closure of the trail.

“The Board of Supervisors directed DOT to reduce the rock size at Little Sluice, and now they’re going ahead and doing it. We asked that the county add more fill to lessen the amount of rock-blasting and the board made that decision,” Arenz said.

In legalese, the trail is an “attractive nuisance,” Arenz noted and the RTF “made compromises on behalf of most users.” He said the county is using “best management practices to achieve the Cleanup and Abatement Order.”

“The county has done nearly everything we asked, and we feel that they have done what they needed to do, and we’ve done what we needed to do.”

Arenz acknowledged that there are “extreme views” on both sides of the issue, that is the “environmentalists” and the extreme off-roaders. He said the work to be done by the helicopter is the cheapest and most efficient way to move the material and added, “we expected this (the reaction from some users) and that some will be unhappy about it.”

County staff at the Clerk of the Board’s Office were “bombarded” by the number of e-mails coming in to supervisors and to their department. Supervisor Jack Sweeney said “tying things up and flooding the front desk does not help.”

Sweeney is the board member most involved with the Rubicon Trail issue and he told the Mountain Democrat that he has “fond memories of riding on the trail in a stock Jeep in 1958.” He envisions a return of the trail to its earlier condition “to allow nearly stock vehicles” to again be able to drive the entire route.

“This is a public road after all. It’s not anyone’s special playground that excludes everyone else from using the trail,” he said. “We are doing exactly what we said we were going to do back in January of 2010 and what came out of the negotiations to drop the lawsuits and to comply with the CAO.”


Discussion | 8 comments

  • Nathan foltz.October 04, 2012 - 8:23 pm

    How much did this cost? I'm sure we could have used this money on something a little more pending.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Shawn BakerOctober 05, 2012 - 7:17 am

    Follow the money. Why did Sweeney want this section of the trail filled in? Is it possible he has a cabin nearby and wants easier access? Is it possible he has a vested interest in having others with stock vehicles access the trail--beyond his own 1958 memories?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • William LoachOctober 05, 2012 - 10:04 am

    I have a better idea. Ban these overgrown toys altogether. Bunch of spoiled, self-centered babies. Get out and walk, for a change.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Thomas GibneyOctober 05, 2012 - 4:01 pm

    In my opinion it did not need to be done. It seems to satiate the Jeepers USA and Jeepers Jambo people, some of who also are in RTF the Rubicon Trail Foundation... Mr Loach, you are a part of the problem your mentality is ignorant of what transpires in the OHV world Sweeney does not have property on the trail to my knowledge, however John Arenz does. People like Karen Schambach are the true culprits as to the reconstruction of the Rubicon. Her main goal is to oulaw OHV travel, same mind set as Mr Loach. MR. Foltz, Most of the money used to maintain the trail is Grant Money. It makes me sick that the BOS threw aside OHV users input for appeasing the Karen Schambachs of the state. However the trail will change soon from weather and use it is one of the best maintained OHV trails in the country just wait till they put the double Yellow line down it....

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • richard engstrandOctober 06, 2012 - 7:56 pm

    As a gold dredger who was illegally forced off the rivers, I can tell you the RTF is doomed. The enviros will destroy you and the hunters will be next.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • 33/3rdOctober 06, 2012 - 9:51 pm

    Who were the "numb nuts" that moved the rocks in the first place? Must be the same "knuckle headed numb nuts" who don't want change! Quit tearing things up!! Before long, you're not gonna' be able to take a jeep there anyway. This Bud is for you! Dumb Ass!.....

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Thomas GibneyOctober 07, 2012 - 11:35 am

    33/3rd...been on the trail have you? Do alot of trail clean up and 4 wheeling I bet?! I and many others have done much for this trail Not alot of "Tearing it up" happening people are getting educated. There is a passion about this trail and about OHV recreation. If you don't understand it, then please take the time to get educated beyond your narrow minded views...

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Kyle CurtisOctober 15, 2012 - 3:47 pm

    In response to William "I have a better idea. Ban these overgrown toys altogether. Bunch of spoiled, self-centered babies. Get out and walk, for a change." I am a broke avid offroader/hiker/biker, ect and Find the fact that you would act like such a self-centered person yourself? I have a handicaped father that uses his 1949 chevy pickup, that is an overgrown toy in essance (not street legal) to come camping with the family when we explore and hike to places you would not be able to take a stock truck/suv and in some cases stock 4wheeler/side-by-side's! Live in someone elses shoes, and relize not everyone is capible of hiking, and relize, just becouse you are disabled does not mean you should sit at home and not do a damn thing in this world!

    Reply | Report abusive comment


EDH Fire Dept. annexing Latrobe

By Noel Stack | From Page: A1, 7 Comments

Motorcycle fatality in Greenwood

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1

Greenwood School being restored

By Rebecca Murphy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Cal Fire increasing staffing, hiring

By Cal Fire | From Page: B1

EID restricts watering days

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A1, 11 Comments

Lover’s Leap fall injures man

By Tahoe Tribune | From Page: A1

Tea Party meeting April 17

By Tea Party Patriots Of El Dorado Hills | From Page: A3, 48 Comments

Town Hall Meeting on Underage Drinking May 1

By El Dorado Hills Community Vision Coalition | From Page: A6

Floating body not a body

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A7

Old mill a goner

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A11, 18 Comments | Gallery



Middle class getting poorer?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 50 Comments

Real estate lies

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 13 Comments

A great big thanks

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Murder? Suicide?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 7 Comments

‘Drive Clean’

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 4 Comments



Griz have challenging day

By Mike Bush | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Outside with Charlie: Switch gear

By Charlie Ferris | From Page: A8

Ponderosa volleyball is a family affair

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Aussie team makes visit

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A8

Roundup: April 15, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A9 | Gallery



At a glance: Take aim on fun

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2

Men to walk a mile in her shoes

By Center For Violence-Free Relationships | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Runners stampede for Sugarloaf scholarships

By El Dorado County Office of Education | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Team works to fight disease

By Placerville Kiwanis | From Page: B3

COOL School is accepting applications

By Rescue Union | From Page: B4

Band of Miwoks fund mission

By Shingle Springs Band Of Miwok Indians | From Page: B12



Crime Log: March 25-27

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

Weather stats 4-15-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2



Numa Edward “Ed” Roberts

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Ronald Russell Rohrer

By Contributor | From Page: A2, 2 Comments


Real Estate



Horoscope, Thursday, April 17, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Horoscope, Wednesday, April 16, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10

Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10