Placerville Mayor Dave Machado took the opportunity to "drop bombshells," as he described it, at Tuesday's Placerville City Council meeting, first with regard to accusations of conflict of interest and unpermitted structures on his personal property and then with regard to a proposed roundabout.
At the July 26 City Council meeting, Vice Mayor Mark Acuna directed staff to prepare a report regarding Smith Flat resident Barry Batchelor 's claims that structures on Machado's Mosquito Road property had been built without a plan check, plan review or permit.
At the same meeting city resident Evelyn Veerkamp questioned a possible conflict of interest between Machado's role as a Redevelopment Agency officer and his ownership of property in the redevelopment project area and Councilwoman Wendy Mattson had asked for a clarification of the ownership of the same piece of property on Broadway.
Early during Tuesday's meeting, Machado brought up a Mountain Democrat article that reported the concerns expressed at the July 26 meeting and Machado's comments about it.
"I want to explain my comments," said the mayor. "My son purchased the property on Broadway ... and he could not obtain a loan for the improvements." Machado said, that like any father, he wanted to help his son out and so had himself put on the title — but after talking to the city's redevelopment counsel, he had himself removed from the title the same day.
"The city looked into the situation and found that I had made a mistake in going on the title, but that it wasn't intentional and it had been corrected," said Machado.
Then Machado shifted his attention to the issues surrounding his Mosquito Road property.
"Since 2005 I've been dealing with an illegally permitted building on my property ... also the building doesn't fit the zoning."
He referred to actions taken in the past few days to obtain a building permit and a plan check and said he would continue to take the appropriate actions to make the building legal.
"I've made the decision to recuse myself from all Redevelopment Agency activities and any City Council decisions that deal with redevelopment," said Machado. " I apologize to everybody in Placerville for anything I may have done."
Vice Mayor Acuna said, "In light of the mayor's statement, the balance of the council asked me to make this statement: 'The mayor has admitted certain transgressions and the council does not condone those transgressions. They expect the mayor to continue to take action to comply with all city laws and ordinances.'"
The report on the Mayor's Mosquito property, scheduled at the end of the meeting agenda, turned out to be a verbal report by City Manager Cleve Morris.
"Mayor Machado's comments summed up the report," said Morris, "so I have nothing to add. We will continue to monitor the situation and bring it back to the council."
In a later telephone interview, Acuna said, "I'm extremely disappointed that any member of City Council would have such disregard for city policies. I question the mayor's ability to sit on that dias and question people with permit or land-use issues."
Acuna said he is working to get a written report outlining the issues of Machado's Mosquito Road property released as a public document.
"The issues started when he was a citizen and have followed into his term on City Council," said Acuna. "It's the job of the voters of Placerville to send a clear message if they object to the mayor's behavior. I'm genuinely concerned about the city and what the mayor's irresponsible action is doing to disrupt the business of the city."
Responding to on-line comments about Machado's property issues, Acuna said he was" repulsed at the thought that anyone would consider me or our staff one of Dave Machado's cronies."
At the end of Tuesday's City Council meeting, Machado said he had what he described as "a second bombshell" to drop, with reference to the proposed roundabout at the intersection of Cedar Ravine and Main Street.
"We are in litigation on this matter and spending money on a lawsuit that we don't have. I'm finding no support for the roundabout."
He asked for staff to keep in place other parts of the projects to improve traffic on Clay Street and Cedar Ravine but to do an analysis of the project, leaving out the roundabout, and instead placing a stoplight at Pacific Street and Cedar Ravine.
Some confused discussion ensued with other members of the City Council until City Attorney John Driscoll reminded them that Machado's directive needed to be put on a future agenda after being discussed in closed session first, due to litigation.
All members of the council were present at Tuesday's meeting.
E-mail Wendy Schultz at wschultz@mtdemocrat.net or call 530-344-5068.
The Mountain Democrat does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy
dale pierceAugust 10, 2011 - 11:42 am
There certainly is little support for the roundabout, but this entire project needs close scrutiny by the public. The studies done originally show very brief wait times at this intersection- in fact the traffic holdups are at the Courthouse and at Pacific Street. A traffic light will do nothing to improve those areas, and replacing the existing bridge on Clay Street with one 55 feet wide seems completely unnecessary
fedupAugust 10, 2011 - 1:48 pm
Don't do the roundabout, a stupid and irresponsible waste of taxpayer dollars to correct a problem that doesn't exist. Don't waste more money on a traffic light to correct that same non-existent problem. Don't replace or "improve" the Clay Street bridge on the taxpayers' dime, even though it leads to develop-able property owned by....guess who. Don't spend taxpayers' money to "redevelop" the mayor's and other councilpeople's property. If they own property which they decide needs to be "redeveloped" they should "redevelop" their own property at their own expense, or sell it. I don't expect anybody to come over to my property and spend their own money against their will to paint, mow, re-roof, etc. Mayor Machado and his buddies have ridden roughshod over Placerville long enough. He should resign from the city council and consider himself lucky he's not in jail. Yet.
Cary VandeverAugust 10, 2011 - 3:52 pm
We don't need a roundabout. Seriously, how long has anyone had to wait at that intersection for their turn to go? Mere seconds, really. I've been a resident here for nearly 20 years now, and in all my time here I have NEVER had to wait more than 15 or maybe 20 seconds to get through, and that's only on rare, very heavy traffic days. More typically the wait is less than 10 seconds. A roundabout will only make matters worse by confusing some drivers and giving others ample opportunity to cut people off or swerve into other vehicles (let's hear it for talking or texting on the phone while going around a curve), creating a very dangerous situation. Why take a perfectly acceptable intersection that doesn't cause problems and create a death trap instead? Do you want people to die? I've seen and driven may roundabouts, and they've all been death traps. I had the misfortune to live just up the road from one in Long Beach, and most of the deaths in that neighborhood came from the roundabout. Hardly three days ever passed without an accident of some sort. Some people got so confused they just drove straight across it. No, really. Even with other vehicles in the way. People in general are not smart enough and/or responsible enough to be able to safely handle a roundabout. Drivers in general get worse and worse at driving all the time, and people lose their lives because of it. Why create the perfect opportunity for increasingly bad drivers to kill more innocents? A stoplight instead of a roundabout is also a bad idea. Again, how long do most people have to wait now to get through the intersection? Not long at all. Put in a stop light and traffic will back up in two directions while only one direction gets to go, potentially for minutes at a time instead of mere seconds. With Main Street already a popular road that contains slow-moving, stop-and-go traffic, waiting for a stoplight will only make that drive so much worse. People will be waiting longer to turn into or out of side streets and parking lots, and the wait will likely make some drivers impatient, so that they refuse to let someone out of a parking lot or side street, instead blocking the way so they don't have to wait for one. more. vehicle. People pulling out of parallel parking will have the same problem: waiting patiently for someone to let them out, and likely waiting considerably longer than they have to now. If they're not patient (a more common attitude nowadays), they'll risk injury to themselves and others by jetting out into traffic when there isn't really enough space, causing people to slam on their brakes ... if they're paying attention, and if they're not already speeding up themselves to prevent the person from pulling out of the parking space. Please don't mess with the intersection AT ALL. It's just fine the way it is, and the money that would go to the project can be better and more responsibly spent elsewhere. Changing it will only cause trouble, and a lot of it. People will be injured and killed. People who don't want to die or be hurt will begin to avoid Main Street. Merchants will feel the pinch of fewer people stopping by their stores. More shops will shut down, and Main Street will begin to look like the huge, mostly empty parking lot with mostly empty stores over by Grocery Outlet at the end of Broadway. Seriously, City Council. What were you thinking? Maim and kill the residents? Destroy the businesses? Are you bunch of modern vikings taking a new angle at the whole "rape, kill, pillage and burn" thing? I thought you were on our (the residents' and merchants') side. That is what you're there for, right?
DarrinAugust 10, 2011 - 5:55 pm
I do not think we need a roundabout built, the intersection seems to work fine just the way it is. I think that is about the end of where I agree with Cary Vandever, however. While some roundabouts may have issues with traffic is entering too fast, the speed in town is 25 mph. It could work, if necessary. People have been using roundabouts in Europe (home of the Vikings) for years without killing each other, though I am sure there are some deaths. Would a roundabout bring about the end of civilized Placerville, where all citizens are out for themselves and drive to kill? I doubt it. Will all the stores shut down and board up their windows? Not likely.
Cary VandeverAugust 11, 2011 - 7:25 am
I agree that roundabouts in Europe work well. I actually lived in Germany for six years as a kid. There's also the Autobahn in Europe, and that works well there too. Imagine bringing that to America, where people don't fear tickets or jail, or even their own deaths, and continually talk, text, eat, put on makeup, etc. while already driving too fast, but never seem to learn the lesson when they or someone else gets hurt because of it. Just because something works well in one country (a country that happens to be a heck of a lot more strict about its traffic laws and the penalties for breaking them) doesn't mean it's going to work well elsewhere, especially in a country that idolizes speed, danger, lack of respect for authority and a love of adrenaline and cheap thrills. Yes, the speed limit on Main Street is 25. What makes you think everyone actually goes that limit? While most people do, all it takes is one idiot with no one in front of them to go rushing into the proposed roundabout too fast and throw off the traffic flow in it. And how many times have people been hit by the 25 mph traffic right on Broadway between the Mountain Democrat and Splasherville, right in the pedestrian crosswalk? At least one death occurred from that; why couldn't it happen again? Some of that Broadway traffic actually goes 25. Some of it doesn't. Some of those drivers slow or stop when there's a pedestrian in the crosswalk, or someone pulling out of a parking lot. Some don't. A speed limit and/or a simple yielding concept isn't going to stop stupid and/or self-centered drivers from being stupid. That roundabout I mentioned in Long Beach? That was a 25 mph zone as well, and STILL people got hurt and killed, because not everyone went that slow, and not everyone had patience. Now, maybe if there was a CHP officer sitting right in plain sight of the roundabout traffic, people would pay attention, go the posted speed limit or slower, and yield properly. But I think that might cost more money that could again be better spent elsewhere, like having that officer pulling over drunk drivers, speeders, and talk/texters on the freeway. Can we afford a CHP roundabout babysitter?
James E.August 10, 2011 - 6:24 pm
A roundabout in a Gold Rush town just isn't Gold Rush.
HangtownAugust 10, 2011 - 6:45 pm
Dirty Daves credibility (if he ever had any) is shot. He needs to resign and the council needs to dump Redevelopment. The majority of the public does not want it anymore than they do the Roundabout. How many millions of our tax dollars are being wasted on the "bridge to nowhere" at Safeway. What a boondoggle. Caltrans (DOT) should be run out of El Dorado County for building this fiasco. There was nothing wrong with the bridge or the brand new ramp they built two years ago. When is the D.A. going to start investigating the Placerville City Council?
White Flower GirlAugust 10, 2011 - 6:54 pm
Down with Dirty Dave. RECALL!!!! Hangtown is right the DA needs to step in and put Dirty Dave where he belongs. IN JAIL. No one else in town can get away with this kind of activity.
WARREN DAVIDAugust 11, 2011 - 5:13 pm
I realize the roundabout is no longer going to happen. Lets face it people some of the excuses are just plain ignorant. If you are unable to navigate a circle, what in the heck are you doing with a drivers license?