Residents who use Mosquito Road are more than familiar with the old bridge that crosses the South Fork American River a few miles northeast of Placerville. It’s been there a long, long time.
Now, the Transportation Division of the El Dorado County Community Development Agency is beginning the process of looking into replacing the Mosquito Bridge. The department is hosting a public workshop Saturday Jan. 26 to gather information regarding issues and concerns folks may have about the bridge.
The workshop is from 2 to 3:30 p.m. at the Mosquito Fire Protection District Station 75, 8801 Rock Creek Road, Placerville.
In a prepared statement, Anne Novotny from DOT noted that the new project is an “update” of a Mosquito Road Bridge Replacement Study completed in 1993. Described as the “initial public scoping meeting,” the event will start with an “Open house followed with a brief presentation by county staff,” according to the statement.
The concept and meaning of “scoping” has become the process by which public entities gather information and “input” from communities or “stakeholders” likely to be affected by some proposed action. Typically, the comments received will become part of a future document that may represent a draft of the proposal in question.
“Within a few weeks after the workshop, information presented at the workshop, public comments received and information about the Mosquito Road Bridge Replacement Study will be posted on the county Website, edcgov.us,” the statement notes.
The process will include alternatives that were identified in the original 1993 study as well as newly proposed alternatives and suggestions and an assessment of their relative feasibility. Public comment and input regarding selection of alternatives and preferred alternatives will be considered throughout the process, the department assures.
The “final updated study” will include recommendations for at least one “preferred alternative,” the document explains.
Work on the bridge comes under the auspices of the Federal Highway Administration and Highway Bridge Program which funds projects related to safety only, according to Matt Smeltzer, deputy director with the Transportation Division. Because the grant is only related to safety, Smeltzer pointed out that the funding could not be used to expand the number of lanes or to add other accoutrements.
“That (1993) study and the current study process consider a two-lane bridge with minimal shoulder widths and necessary safety rail,” he wrote in an e-mail to the Mountain Democrat Thursday. “The type of structure will be dependent on alignment, spans, environmental considerations, aesthetics, constructability and a value analysis.”
The current one-lane suspension bridge was built in 1939 although it has been overhauled, refurbished, replanked and repainted more than once since then following floods, avalanches and smackdowns from too-heavy logging trucks. The river crossing however was first bridged in 1867, according to the county’s historical records.
Contact Chris Daley at 530-344-5063 or firstname.lastname@example.org. Follow @CDaleyMtDemo.