Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Prada digs into consent agenda

From page A1 | January 22, 2014 | 10 Comments

Two items were pulled from the consent agenda Jan. 13 by El Dorado Irrigation District Director Greg Prada.

One was approved and one was carried over to the next meeting.

The item that eventually passed unanimously was a grant application to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for a $1 million Water and Energy Efficiency grant that would be used to pipe the Main Ditch. If the district is awarded the grant and decides to accept it, EID would have to match it with $1 million of its own money.

The Main Ditch transfers Forebay water to Reservoir 1 Water Treatment Plant. Installing a 36- or 42-inch diameter pipe for the three-mile length of the ditch would save 1,000-1,300 acre-feet of water the unlined dirt ditch loses annually. It also would reduce treatment costs by eliminating dirt and debris picked up from the open ditch.

The entire project is estimated to cost $3.4 million by the time it is completed in 2018, according to the 2014-2018 Capital Improvement Plan approved by the EID board Oct. 15, 2013. The CIP is only a plan and each individual project must be presented to the board for approval when it is ready for competitive bidding.

The grant application, however, pegs the total cost at $5.1 million that would be completed in three years instead of five. The El Dorado County Water Agency had already approved $40,000 on a 50-50 basis for EID to hire an environmental consultant. Then in 2013 the Water Agency gave EID $195,000 to do a land survey and initial design. That work is in progress by on-call consultants and will be used in developing the final design.

Prada criticized the grant application, saying, “We’re essentially shrugging our shoulders at $3.1 million. I don’t think we should approve a $3.1 million project in the consent calendar,” Prada said. “I realize we’ve got 10 days to tap into $1 million. It’s a $5.1 million project. The ratepayers don’t want this under the radar.”

“I agree … but we’re under a mandate (to save 20 percent by 2020). This represents 10 percent of the water — 1,300 acre-feet lost because of the ditch. It’s really important. We have a state mandate,” said Director Bill George.

Brian Mueller, director of engineering, said the item was just to apply for the grant, not to approve the project and not to approve funding.

“Could we decline the grant in the future?” asked Board President Alan Day. “If we get  the grant will it come back to the board?”

District Counsel Tom Cumpston responded, “Yes.”

“If we get the grant and the $1 million match, we will have three years to fund the other $3 million,” said Director Dale Coco.

General Manager Jim Abercrombie suggested a series of workshops on capital improvement projects for the benefit of the new board members and the public. He also noted state law requires the district save 20 percent of its water by 2020. “Do we force our ratepayers to conserve or do it by projects?” he asked.

The second consent agenda item that was put over to the next meeting was an outline of procedures for providing accurate information to those who will be buying bonds from EID. Truthful and complete statements of financial condition without any omissions are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

EID is preparing to refinance $130 million of its debt. The refinancing will not extend the maturity date, but will reduce the coupon rate, saving the district $400,000 for the balance of 2014 and save $1 million in interest payments every year thereafter.

“We should have an audit committee,” Prada said.

“Are there any questions about this that staff can help answer?” asked Abercrombie.

“I don’t know. I need time to think about it,” Prada responded.

“It was written by bond counsel, modified by me and (Director of Finance) Mark Price,” Cumpston said.

The document notes that bond counsel also conducted staff training on the procedures, which include preparation of preliminary official statement and then a final official statement, which includes not only the particulars of the bond issue, but “other matters particular to the financing, a section which provides information about the district, including its financial condition as well as the district’s audited financial report, form of the proposed legal opinion and form of continuing disclosure undertaking.”

“It’s critical that this refinancing go through,” Coco said. “If we do not have this resolution to go through the refinancing (could be jeopardized).”

“I agree with Director Prada. I don’t understand it,” said Day.

“It’s going to be difficult for the rating agencies to understand why the board declined to sign the disclosure,” Cumpston said.

“Staff is going to be interviewed by Moody’s (rating service) in the next two weeks,” Abercrombie said.

“I think the debt refinancing is critical. I support it 100 percent. If we fail to refinance, it will fall on the ratepayers,” Coco said.

“Any change in bond ratings can cost millions,” said Director George Osborne. “We have done years of work to get an A+ rating.

“The sky will not fall … There is no harm in slowing things down a little,” Day said.

A motion to continue the “Disclosure Procedures” document to the Jan. 27 meeting passed 3-2, with Prada, Day and Coco voting yes and George and Osborne voting no.

Coco announced that he would not be at the Jan. 27 meeting.

Michael Raffety


Discussion | 10 comments

  • Phil VeerkampJanuary 21, 2014 - 1:38 pm

    Let me make a prediction, and I pray that I am wrong. On January 27th there will be a split 2 - 2 vote with Day and Prada voting no and Osborne and George voting yes and Coco absent. The door to refinancing will close. Prada, Day (and Coco) will cost the ratepayers MILLIONS.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Dink LaneJanuary 21, 2014 - 2:47 pm

    I fail to understand why people who call themselves "Conservative" and "Fiscally Responsible" would think that major items such as, a grant application and procedures for directing staff on providing that information.... should NOT be discussed....... When something is put under "Consent Items"...... That is saying ...... NO Discussion REQUIRED..... I didn't know where I stood with Prada, but with his attention to these matters, I'm seeing that he is the REAL Conservative and fiscally responsible one..... Just maybe, EID might be able to work itself out of their financial mess with someone like Prada.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampJanuary 21, 2014 - 3:52 pm

    Let me help you understand, Dink. Prada was elected on a foundation of LIES. Prada LIED when he asserted that most EID staff would be getting a 7% pay raise. Prada LIED when he asserted that his constituent's water rates per cubic foot are 17 (seventeen ) times higher than agricultural users. When EID staff attempted to refute Prada's LIES Prada viciously attacked them in this paper. So you see, Dink, I am strongly predisposed to doubt, distrust and dislike LIARS. . . . one more time . . . Prada = Board dysfunction.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Phil VeerkampJanuary 21, 2014 - 9:53 pm

    No, James.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • GeraldJanuary 22, 2014 - 7:08 am

    Go Greg. Don't ever stop. Sunshine is the best disinfectant no matter what idiots say about it or you. Hi Phil.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynJanuary 22, 2014 - 7:32 am

    Though not commenting on these particular consent items (haven't studied them), I absolutely agree that much that gets slipped by on Consent elsewhere (BOS & City Council) should be exposed to open debate. Is EID any different?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Paul RavelingJanuary 22, 2014 - 2:59 pm

    In this discussion it appears to be Director Prada who needs to be audited, not EID. On the first item, when there's a regulatory requirement it's legally given that it must be done. Public agencies normally leap at the opportunity for grants to reduce actual agency costs: It's a no-brainer. On the second item, Director Osborne was on target. I worry that Director Prada is quickly becoming as obstructive to sound management as Mr. Prada was in the Cost Of Services Study and in the public discourse.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • EvelynJanuary 22, 2014 - 6:14 pm

    Paul: Thank you for the input re regulatory requirements/grants.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • It Helps To Read The Article, EvelynJanuary 22, 2014 - 7:33 pm

    REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS: " . . . He also noted state law requires the district save 20 percent of its water by 2020 . . . "

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Tetchy TetchyJanuary 23, 2014 - 2:14 am

    Reply | Report abusive comment


Greenwood School being restored

By Rebecca Murphy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Cal Fire increasing staffing, hiring

By Cal Fire | From Page: B1

EID restricts watering days

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A1, 10 Comments

Lover’s Leap fall injures man

By Tahoe Tribune | From Page: A1

EDH Fire Dept. annexing Latrobe

By Noel Stack | From Page: A1, 7 Comments

Motorcycle fatality in Greenwood

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1

Tea Party meeting April 17

By Tea Party Patriots Of El Dorado Hills | From Page: A3, 41 Comments

Town Hall Meeting on Underage Drinking May 1

By El Dorado Hills Community Vision Coalition | From Page: A6

Floating body not a body

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A7

Old mill a goner

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A11, 6 Comments | Gallery



My turn: A fair California flat income tax

By Mark Belden | From Page: A4

DA Pierson has been outstanding

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4, 21 Comments



A great big thanks

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Murder? Suicide?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 5 Comments

‘Drive Clean’

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 3 Comments

Middle class getting poorer?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 37 Comments

Real estate lies

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 6 Comments



Outside with Charlie: Switch gear

By Charlie Ferris | From Page: A8

Ponderosa volleyball is a family affair

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Aussie team makes visit

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A8

Griz have challenging day

By Mike Bush | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Roundup: April 15, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A9 | Gallery



Runners stampede for Sugarloaf scholarships

By El Dorado County Office of Education | From Page: B2 | Gallery

At a glance: Take aim on fun

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2

Men to walk a mile in her shoes

By Center For Violence-Free Relationships | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Team works to fight disease

By Placerville Kiwanis | From Page: B3

COOL School is accepting applications

By Rescue Union | From Page: B4

Band of Miwoks fund mission

By Shingle Springs Band Of Miwok Indians | From Page: B12



Crime Log: March 25-27

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

Weather stats 4-15-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2



Numa Edward “Ed” Roberts

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Ronald Russell Rohrer

By Contributor | From Page: A2, 2 Comments


Real Estate




By Contributor | From Page: A10

Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A10


By Contributor | From Page: A10

Horoscope, Thursday, April 17, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Horoscope, Wednesday, April 16, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A10