Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Pro-growth, no-growth, slow-growth: BOS listens to public points

DSC_4734 ec

BILL CENTER, representing Rural Communities United, speaks on El Dorado County growth and traffic statistics to the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors on Aug. 26. Democrat photo by Krysten Kellum

From page A1 | September 04, 2013 | 19 Comments

A standing-room-only crowd of about 200 packed the Board of Supervisors chambers in Placerville on Aug. 26 to hear about and to discuss growth in the county. Former District 4 Supervisor Bill Center and Camino resident Jim Moore, known as the “Measure Y guys,” delivered a presentation generally showing how growth, as currently planned, will clog local roads and choke transportation, especially in the western parts of the county.

Measure Y was enacted by a significant majority of the county’s voters in 1998 and re-authorized for another 10 years in the 2008 election. In its simplest terms, the law requires developers of residential properties to “fully fund road improvements that keep traffic levels below Level of Service F (F as in Failing).”  Furthermore, if traffic problems resulting from new development cannot be mitigated, the county cannot approve new housing projects, according to the presentation.

The measure applies to projects or subdivisions of five or more homes if it is determined that the cumulative impact will result in traffic gridlock (LOS F) “on major roads, intersections, interchanges or highways.”

Center described the current status of Highway 50 from El Dorado Hills Boulevard to the El Dorado County line as already at LOS F, citing data gathered by the California Department of Transportation. He said CalTrans also notes that between El Dorado Hills Boulevard and Cameron Park Drive, Highway 50 is now at 92 percent of capacity and there are no plans to widen the highway within the next 20 years, he said.

Describing additional CalTrans data, Center showed a slide that reports Highway 50 is currently at LOS F from Sunrise Boulevard in Rancho Cordova to El Dorado Hills Boulevard. Displaying another CalTrans study, between the county line and Latrobe Road (El Dorado Hills Blvd), the highway experienced LOS F for averages as little as less than one hour last December and January to a high of 12 hours in April and about 8.5 in May.

As of Aug. 29, the county had already approved 15,832 homes that could be built. The bulk of that number, 7,290 or 48 percent, is slated for El Dorado Hills. Another 6,770 have been approved for areas in the “rural county.” Proposed (not approved) projects in 2013 include 3,236 homes in the Marble Valley area of Cameron Park, 1,041 in the Shingle Springs San Stino project and another 1,028 in central El Dorado Hills. Other smaller developments are proposed for Diamond Springs/El Dorado, Lime Rock in Cameron Park and three others in the El Dorado Hills area, Center’s presentation noted.

An update of the 2004 county general plan known as the Land Use Policy Programmatic Update or LUPPU authorizes an additional 10,916 residential units, however none has yet been approved. In total, the Measure Y guys’ data conclude that 34,072 could be built unless the county strictly adheres to the limiting measure.

“Highway 50 is at LOS F and can’t be mitigated … We can’t approve more housing subdivisions” the general information element of the slide presentation warns.

Looking at the issues

District 5 Supervisor Norma Santiago expressed some frustration saying “there’s a lot of numbers floating around … What are the right ones?”

The answer left her and others little better informed.

The county development agency’s long-range planner Shawna Purvines said, “It depends on what issue you’re looking at.” She was not being flippant.

The county is part of a larger entity that must abide by state and federal guidelines dealing with a host of diverse issues, from air and water quality to species protection to allocations providing for low-income housing. Different programs use different data collected at different times which may not apply when viewed from the perspective of some other issue. The Mountain Democrat is attempting to acquire further information on which numbers apply in which issues.

Center and Moore continued their program with a series of recommendations and offers of assistance to devise policies that will “protect rural communities.” Toward that end, they described an organization called “Rural Communities United” consisting of about 20 neighborhood groups such as the Green Valley Alliance, Shingle Springs Community Alliance, No San Stino, the local chapter of the Sierra Club and various homeowners associations. The larger group intends to file a proposed initiative on the 2014 ballot.

The proposed initiative suggests policy concepts that would prevent approval of new housing projects if the cumulative impact of increased traffic would result in a LOS F on any county road, state highway or intersection. The other side of that coin notes that road capacity improvements would have to be made in advance of any project approval.

The “Protect Rural Communities” element of the proposed initiative calls for maintaining current designations specifying low and medium-density housing limits within the current Community Region boundaries of El Dorado Hills, Cameron Park and Shingle Springs and “(Prohibiting) the expansion of Community Region boundaries to approve large housing projects.” Requirements for open space and recreation would also be kept at current designations.

Suggestions for immediate action include continuing the General Plan update process with policies “that don’t worsen traffic” and conducting Environmental Impact Report analysis of the county’s just-completed Traffic Demand Model. That analysis should look at the 15,832 parcels already approved, agricultural districts, mixed use development with commercial and retail amenities, affordable housing and EID water availability, the presentation states. Following such an analysis, the group advises a reduction of Traffic Impact Mitigation (TIM) fees.

In conclusion, Center and Moore reiterated that Highway 50 is already at Level of Service F and cannot be mitigated. There are currently enough vacant parcels to accommodate 15,000 more homes and “We need to shift thinking from building our economy around tract housing to expanding local business, agriculture and tourism,” Center said.

Center also asked rhetorically if there are any other numbers coming from the Sacramento Area Council of Governments and its Regional Housing Needs Assessment “that can’t be satisfied by the number 15,832? The answer, I believe, is no.”

SACOG blueprint

SACOG has developed a “blueprint” for managing growth throughout the Sacramento region, which generally calls for higher housing density in specific areas, increased public transportation and “sustainable communities.” As a member of SACOG, El Dorado County is bound by certain requirements such as the Housing Element of the general plan much of which is based on SACOG forecasts.

Supervisors generally adopted one of the group’s suggestions to form a working committee with county staff that could “define the parameters of the lower growth alternative” and return to the board by the end of October with its recommendations. Another suggested goal is to adopt a General Plan Update that “results in the least traffic impact on Highway 50 and county roads and greatly reduces TIM fees.”

The majority in the audience were supportive of the committee’s efforts, and speakers generally favored the “slow-growth” recommendations in the presentation. Earlier, board chairman Ron Briggs had characterized Monday’s workshop as the “other side, the non-developer side of the issue.”

El Dorado County’s General Plan lists several priorities that involve growth in one way or another. Jobs and commercial development are high on that list.

“We’ve got rooftops, but we’re failing on jobs,” District 3 Supervisor Brian Veerkamp said. “Water is also a big issue, and there should be an annual survey of water (resources and capacity). Planning is so critical that we need to put all our cards on the table and be real about it. It’s all about balance, and we’ve got to do it together.”

Santiago repeated that “it’s all about jobs so people don’t have to travel to work” while Center and Moore both had noted that transportation options other than the private vehicle are practically non-existent.

“I can tell you what people in this county want,” Sue Taylor addressed the board. “Keep it rural. Measure Y was meant to stop taxpayers having to pay for roads while developers want to ‘blacktop’ the county. Everyone is working from the SACOG blueprint.”

Taylor has long advocated for the county to get out of the regional organization saying that many regional goals do not fit El Dorado’s rural nature.

Briggs eventually restated the board’s directive that county “staff sit down with Rural Communities United and go over the numbers.”

For a related article on Measure Y’s strength, click here.

Contact Chris Daley at 530-344-5063 or Follow @CDaleyMtDemo.


Discussion | 19 comments

  • Fran DuchampSeptember 03, 2013 - 5:44 pm

    Long day..I had to leave--hats off to those that stayed.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • LpSeptember 03, 2013 - 9:17 pm

    Please stop mowing down and paving over our historic town, and county...

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • LpSeptember 03, 2013 - 9:40 pm

    God bless you Sue Taylor! Brian should have never been voted in. His brother Doug, who I went to high school and graduated with, is one of the nicest guys you will ever want to meet. Come on Doug,...when you mow down a hillside, do you feel some since of loss? God bless you, and I'm happy you're successful. But please remember we have a history here! Take your buisness to the bigger city's, and leave it alone here. Brian, I went to school with you to. Please resigne from the have nothing but self interest here....sorry Phill. I really don't want to piss anybody off, but I'm sure I have....

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Foaming at the MouthSeptember 03, 2013 - 11:05 pm

    Lp is right - anyone who says that it's all about balance and that we have to work it out together has no place on the El Dorito County BOS. What we need is more people who Foam at the Mouth!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JimBoSeptember 04, 2013 - 5:29 am

    Remember who Jim Moore and Bill Center are? They are No-Growth advocates who campaigned in the 90's that Measure Y wasn't a "No Growth" measure, it only required developers to pay for the road improvements to maintain proper traffic level of service. Now Jim Moore and Bill Center are advocating No Growth. Now that they have their foot in the door they have changed their tune. Just another reason you can't believe a word out of their mouths. They are not Planners, they are politicians, and very devious politicians who want absolutely no growth.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Be afraidSeptember 04, 2013 - 6:19 am

    Measure Y was also modified in 2008 because Mr. Center wanted to "fix" some unintended consequences. Part of that was how much money both he and Mr. Moore would have to pay for their own individual development projects. They still do not like the fees, the fees that they helped to put in place as a deterrent because those fees are for the developers, not them. Now they have another scheme that says if there is no growth, if housing needs are accommodated by everyone putting in granny flats and let the "approved" housing be the magic number all is well. Then all fees can be reduced because there is no change. Bottom line is that this is all about these messengers and their personal plans and projects. The master manipulator is at work. Be afraid, be very afraid..

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Fran DuchampSeptember 04, 2013 - 8:17 am

    I dont believe any of them...including CEDAC. all numbers being used are guesses. Some didnt really talk about apartments--and we know thats coming (it full fills low income housing)...but the meeting room was crowded...and outside the meeting room was just as crowded.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Fran DuchampSeptember 04, 2013 - 8:20 am

    "that Measure Y wasn't a "No Growth" measure, it only required developers to pay for the road improvements to maintain proper traffic level of service." At the meeting it was said that hwy 50 cant be built out any more...which up here it really cant that would be taking peoples property.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Compass2TruthSeptember 04, 2013 - 9:05 am

    Something stinks--Click on Approval of Agenda and Consent Calendar of the 8/27 BOS meeting: **Note how County Counsel Ed Knapp winks at reporter Chris Daley regarding the LUPPU item. Then watch how Chairman Briggs reacts when his feet are held to the fire (same disrespect shown to Sheriff D'Agostini and a retired Marine in March 2011.) Mikalaco follows Briggs out of the room but meanwhile Veerkamp and Santiago remain seated during Briggs arrogant display of disrespect speaks volumes.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Doubting ThomasSeptember 04, 2013 - 11:50 am

    Briggs pre-conned directive "staff sit down with Rural Communities United and go over the numbers" sounds more like a date to dine with the Devil.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Gerald LillpopSeptember 04, 2013 - 5:45 pm

    Mr. Daley Marble Valley and Lime Rock are not in Cameron Park. They are in El Dorado Hills. Ask Parker Development and they will tell you Cameron Park will not receive one cent in property taxes but will bare the brunt of traffic from these developments on Cambridge at Highway 50.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • JackSeptember 04, 2013 - 7:33 pm

    Let's heed Deep Throat's advice to Woodward and Bernstein: Follow the money! Local elected county governments across the U.S. rely almost entirely on developers' $$$contributions to get elected or re-elected. It follows that 99.99% of local governments do the bidding of developers, no matter how much foaming at the mouth we may do.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • El Dorado County Ballot Measure: Stop ALL New Homes and Businesses–Close the CountySeptember 04, 2013 - 7:50 pm

    [...] Pro-growth, no-growth, slow-growth: BOS listens to public points [...]

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • GomesSeptember 05, 2013 - 12:22 pm

    When will people get it? ElDoCo (EDH/Cameron Park) NEEDS growth! More homes, and MORE businesses! You think those all those tweekers in Pville and Camino/PP are paying into the tax base? Who do you think is supporting ElDoCo these days?

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Fran DuchampSeptember 05, 2013 - 12:46 pm

    gomes...Id be nicer to Apple Hill if I were has carried this county for many years with its very popular tourism. this is an AG county...sorry you didnt realise that. Pollock has the trees...we are the timber line.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Foaming at the MouthSeptember 05, 2013 - 7:35 pm

    But but but...tourism is the road to bankruptcy! I know because Fran said so. We must terminate Apple Hill at once!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Fran DuchampSeptember 05, 2013 - 8:34 pm

    I said marketing tourism has lead others to bankruptcy...but Im glad you are you also know--im against a certain type of "tourism marketing"...such as --up here" fancy restaurants " when we cant support the ones we have. But good try--one of you may catch me--but im not really worried. I hear people are trying to do away with apple hill--but it is not me...I would like to see more AG activities. I also said many many times that until someone cares about fixing families that are already here--wasting money on marketing stupid. supporting something that already exists...never said anything about it. But when Apple Hill is gone--remember you said it first.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Demand AccountabilitySeptember 05, 2013 - 10:11 pm

    Publicly, Ron Briggs maintains his “keep it rural” mantra while patronizing community groups on the Community Region boundaries and pandering to Bill Center and Jim Moore. At the same time, Briggs is pulling strings behind the scenes to help Parker Development pick up an extra 3,000 units or so on top of what they already have approval for under the General Plan. Apparently, Briggs is really a "no-growth/pro-growth" guy. He had the opportunity to show us where he stands several months back when Supervisor Veerkamp suggested a policy allowing the County to shut down Parker’s development projects and other projects involving General Plan amendments that total nearly 7,000 new units. Briggs not only wouldn’t endorse the policy, he moved the item to the end of the agenda, apparently hoping that Shingle Springs residents and others would go home. That didn’t happen because most of us came back for the afternoon session. The Board has the power to pull these projects up and vote them down NOW. They need to stop wasting our time. We need to call Briggs out and make him tell us where he stands. If he votes to let Parker’s projects go ahead, we’ll have our answer.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Be accountable BriggsSeptember 06, 2013 - 5:44 am

    Mr. Briggs, why don't you deal with the projects? Why not support a policy which deals with projects. Stop facilitating community anxiety and division. Deal with the real problem. Stop being bullied by devious political movers. We get it. You want to pick and choose on the backs of the citizens.

    Reply | Report abusive comment


No quick fix for California’s highways

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1

More mountain lion sightings reported

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1, 4 Comments

Supervisor Nutting trial begins

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1, 8 Comments | Gallery

Sanford murder case to jury

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Herard over the back fence: Try fishing at Wakamatsu

By Bob Billingsley | From Page: B1

Downtown group coordinates painting, awnings

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: A1

Gearing tax questions to correct office saves time

By Treasurer-Tax Collector | From Page: A3



My turn: More than a buzzword

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A4, 4 Comments

Building restored

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4

Outstanding dog

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4




By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 4 Comments

Altshuler framing

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 5 Comments

National Day of Prayer

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 1 Comment

‘Parents, be afraid’ letter

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 4 Comments

Ukranian situation

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 2 Comments



Outside with Charlie: Transitioning

By Charlie Ferris | From Page: A6

Pitching the ‘Root’ cause of Trojans’ victory

By Mike Bush | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Pedal power at the forefront next month

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Sports Scene: April 22, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A7

Roundup: April 22, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A7



4-H’ers star at showcase

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: B1 | Gallery

At a glance: Look for fireballs

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2, 1 Comment

Authors to share their stories

By Pat Lakey | From Page: B2, 2 Comments

Church to host human trafficking conference

By Pollock Pines | From Page: B3

Grow For It! Flower of Easter

By Barbara Schuchart | From Page: B5



Crime Log: April 1-3

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

Weather stats 4-22-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2

Building permits 4/7-11/2014

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2



Harry Frank Harper

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Marion “Wayne” Griswold

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Bobby Lloyd Bridges

By Contributor | From Page: A2


Real Estate




By Contributor | From Page: A8

Horoscope, Thursday, April 24, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Horoscope, Wednesday, April 23, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A8

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8


By Contributor | From Page: A8

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A8

Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A8