Wednesday, July 30, 2014

SLT city blasts League to Save Lake Tahoe over lawsuit

July 11, 2011 |

By Adam Jensen

SOUTH LAKE TAHOE — South Lake Tahoe officials accused the League to Save Lake Tahoe June 21 of putting out false information regarding a federal lawsuit the environmental group filed against the city the week before.

The League filed suit against the city in federal court in Sacramento on June 24. The litigation seeks to stop implementation of the city’s general plan, which will guide development in South Lake Tahoe for the next 20 years.

Council members approved the general plan May 17.

The city’s review of the plan did not address environmental damage that could be caused, nor did it suggest adequate measures to mitigate potential degradation, according to a Monday statement from the league.

In the statement the league said the city’s general plan “includes over 1,000 new high-density residences and over 100 acres of six-story buildings.”

City spokeswoman Nancy Kerry called the statement a “deliberate attempt to confuse the discussion.”

“The league’s actions once again demonstrate their willingness to mislead the public and now the courts in a way that redirects the public’s very limited resources defending legal complaints rather than spending resources on improving the infrastructure that is, in fact, contributing to lake clarity degradation,” Kerry said in a Monday statement.

Six-story buildings

Development of more than 900 housing units in South Lake Tahoe is subject to Tahoe Regional Planning Agency approval, and the reference to six-story buildings refers to a draft version of the general plan that was not approved, Kerry said.

League to Save Lake Tahoe executive director Rochelle Nason deferred comment June 24 to spokeswoman Amanda Royal. Royal said the League stands by its statement.

“We stick by our release. We stick by our facts,” Royal said, pointing to statements from the general plan’s draft environmental document posted on the league’s Website.

One of the documents, the scenic resources section, highlights a table that would allow building heights up to six stories in “Tourist Center” and “Town Center” areas around the “Y” at stateline, Ski Run Boulevard and several areas in the Bijou and Al Tahoe neighborhoods. A six-story building is assumed to be 75 feet tall in the draft plan.

The section was not in the general plan approved by the council in May, and the city has no intention of pushing for six-story buildings, Kerry said.

In the final environmental document, the table referenced by the league is revised “to limit maximum building height consistent with TRPA height standards except within the designated node for Tahoe Valley … where a maximum of 45 feet would be allowed.”

The city has shown the revision to league staff during previous conversations, Kerry said.

“The league is well aware and fully informed that the city’s General Plan does not contain provisions to build six-story buildings over 100 acres, yet they have knowingly released several statements to the contrary and those misleading statements remain on their website,” according to Monday’s statement form the city.

Breaching the regional plan

In the June 24 suit the league also contends the city illegally stepped in front of the TRPA’s regional plan when it approved its general plan. The environmental group also contends the city should have sought project approval from TRPA for the plan.

“From a planning perspective, the city is putting the cart before the horse, because it is prematurely trying to adopt a new general plan before there is a new regional plan,” Nason said in Tuesday’s statement. “This is a clear violation of the TRPA code of ordinances.”

The TRPA’s long delayed regional plan update is expected to be before the agency’s governing board by December 2012. If the general plan conflicts with the regional plan, TRPA’s rules will take precedence, according to the city.

City Attorney Patrick Enright declined to comment on the suit June 21, noting he has seen it on the league’s Website but has not been officially served.

He did say local jurisdictions have not been required to bring general plans to the governing board in the past.

TRPA spokesman Jeff Cowen agreed.

“Both the city’s plan and the Regional Plan Update are calling for substantial reductions in pavement, cleaner air through pedestrian-transit oriented development and many world-class environmental improvements through environmental redevelopment,” Cowen said in a statement. “The TRPA board does not take action to approve local plans or ordinances.”





District 2 candidate statements tell of goals

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1

Sand Fire nears containment: 66 structures destroyed

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Tails wagging over dog park approval

By Julie Samrick | From Page: A3

Quarter-acre fire in Kelsey

By Rebecca Murphy | From Page: A3

Schedule for Highway 50 blasting closures

By News Release | From Page: A3



My Turn: Privatization of public services

By Mark Belden | From Page: A4

Policy book

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4



GDPUD management report

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

District 2 supervisorial special election

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 3 Comments

Piano replaced

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Comments sign-in policy

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 1 Comment

Save the Guinea Worm

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 1 Comment

Large bangs

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 2 Comments

Private property gets no respect

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 1 Comment



Taz pull through for SSL trophy

By Patty Pope | From Page: A8

Ex-Bruin lends a helping hand

By Steven Shaff | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Sierra Sharks finish middle of the pack

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A8

Roundup: July 29, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A8



Nuns discover a pleasant place

By Lexi Boeger | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Bargains can be found everywhere

By Democrat Staff | From Page: B2 | Gallery

At a glance: Game time

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2

Barbecue dinner to benefit Blue Star Moms

By Mount Aukum Winery | From Page: B2

Stagecoach story takes riders on a trip

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: B3

Help needed to make cool ties

By Sew 4 | From Page: B3

Stroke and osteoporosis screenings planned

By Life Line Screening | From Page: B3

Gold Rush Days activities cancelled this year

By Sacramento Convention And Visitors Center | From Page: B4

Master Food Preservers: Tomato time

By Monique Wilber | From Page: B4

Build an author platform at the Library

By El Dorado | From Page: B5

Sacramento area museums offer summer fun

By Sacramento Association Of Museums | From Page: B5



Weather stats 7-29-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2

Building permits 6/2-6/2014

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2Comments are off for this post

Crime Log: July 17

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2



Merlyn Wilbur Adams

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Lisa Oliver Rose

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Wallace Murrel Thomas

By Contributor | From Page: A2


Real Estate




Women’s Health

Love the skin you’re in

By Noel Stack | From Page: WH4

Dump stress and improve your health, productivity

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: WH7Comments are off for this post

Women’s Health Expo

By Marshall Medical | From Page: WH8

Find the confidence you need to fight back

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: WH12

Our choices directly affect our health

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: WH14

They’re NOT your mother’s hearing devices!

By Marshall Medical | From Page: WH17