They grumbled about it for a while, but members of the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors eventually voted unanimously to approve the Capital Improvement Plan submitted by the county’s Department of Transportation. DOT first brought its draft proposal to the board May 8 for review and consideration. At that time, supervisors basically accepted the department’s recommendations and directed staff to bring it back in June for final approval.
Maintenance work on four bridges is included in the plan, however no work has been done to date. The DOT schedules calls for maintenance to occur over the next four to five years. Those bridges are on Mt. Aukum Road at the North Fork, Cosumnes River; Ice House Road at the Jones Fork of Silver Creek; Bayne Road at Dutch Creek and Cosumnes Mine Road also on the river’s North Fork.
The major project on the 10-point list is Phase 1A of the Diamond Springs Parkway which is proposed to connect Highway 49 with Missouri Flat Road. Design work on the parkway is approximately 60 percent complete and environmental documents have been filed and approved. Realignment of the highway and construction are slated to begin by 2013-14, according to the CIP proposal. This phase of the project is estimated to cost $5.9 million.
Installing a traffic signal at Patterson Drive on Pleasant Valley Road just south of Diamond Springs represents the next most costly of the 10 projects, according to DOT. The proposal is approved for $3.1 million, of which $1.6 million will be in the form of outside grant money. A bit more than half has been collected by the county in Traffic Impact Mitigation Fees.
Environmental documentation has already been approved by the county and CalTrans, and the project design is 80 percent complete. The upcoming work will finish the design, acquire remaining right of way and begin construction. Some of that work will be done in 2012, and the rest is set for next year.
Interim DOT director Kim Kerr told the board at its June 19 meeting that the entire work plan as approved is funded for this year. She also noted that TIM Fees could be altered in the future on new projects, and Ron Briggs suggested that those fees could be lowered “if we scrap the the big interchanges and the larger dormant projects.”
He was referring to plans for enlarging highway interchanges at Shingle Springs, Bass Road and Cameron Park and other related projects.
Supervisor John Knight pointed out that future upgrading of Cameron Park interchange is probably not realistic, because “there aren’t enough empty lots in Cameron Park to warrant the TIM fees” necessary for major construction.
Supervisor Jack Sweeney also took issue with some DOT projections that contemplate widening Pleasant Valley Road and Green Valley Road.
“Pleasant Valley Road is never going to be four-lanes,” Sweeney said. Likewise he expressed “great consternation” at the notion that one day Green Valley Road would be a four-lane thoroughfare.
“People don’t want four lanes on Green Valley — so they can go 75 miles an hour. It’s not an alternate Highway 50. We need to keep it rural,” Sweeney insisted.
Pattie Chelseth of Shingle Springs and Melody Lane of Coloma took issue with the board over several aspects of the overall plan and process. Chelseth pointed out that grant funding represents someone’s tax dollar, perhaps people in Alabama, for example and that regardless of its source, such funding “is coming from other people’s pockets.”
Lane, on the other hand, narrowed the concern to the American River Corridor through Coloma and Lotus and more particularly to Mt. Murphy Road and its bridge over the American River’s South Fork. She said the larger issues have generated too many meetings and left people unable to “connect the dots.” She called for more “transparency and accountability,” and she also said county staff have failed to “provide her with answers to many questions.”
Supervisor Ray Nutting followed Lane’s comments and suggested that “we need to change the tax structure,” while Chelseth concluded by asking the board, “Where do we become complicit in this bad system?”
At that point, supervisors voted 5-0 to approve the 2012 Capital Improvement Plan.
The Mountain Democrat does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy
LameJune 29, 2012 - 6:52 pm
It really doesn't matter with this BOS what is said or what concerns the public has they will still vote to do what has been proved won't work. Lame is the word used here, when you know it's broken and continue to use it all that we can expect is it will come up LAME. When the county cuts personnel and then complains we don't have enough staff to do the job it's LAME. When we have been through four CAO's let's go get another one and bring in an assistant and give them more power that's LAME. When we pay to have a study done when we already know the results that's LAME. Let's stop and fix this LAME system and the people in it, hold people accountable and follow the money, stop the bleeding before we are LAME.
Melody LaneJune 29, 2012 - 10:03 pm
I’d requested item #14 be pulled from the Consent Calendar for public discussion. Had it not been pulled, the BOS would have approved it, no questions asked. Jack Sweeney—not Ray Nutting--was out of order by making comments about the workshops AFTER I’d already sat down. Watch the item #14 video segment of the 6/19 BOS to get a proper perspective of what really transpired: http://eldorado.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx For years Ron Briggs & DOT personnel have deliberately avoided responding to resident’s specific questions & concerns regarding traffic, roads and bridges in District #4. That is unacceptable. It’s high time we get transparency & accountability from our public servants. As Tom McClintock says, “Hold their feet to the fire!”
Melody LaneJuly 02, 2012 - 12:59 pm
I find it peculiar that it took 3 days for my comment to post AFTER it had been edited. The article is in gross error. Do you call that freedom of the press...or is abuse of 1st Amendment rights more accurate?
Melody LaneJuly 02, 2012 - 5:29 pm
Sups OK DOT road plans reluctantly? I don't think so... DOT, Parks & Recreation, and CEQA are vital elements to understanding the many tentacles of Sustainable Development (aka Agenda 21 or Big Government.) Whether you live directly adjacent to transportation corridors, waterways and public lands (such as I do), or are involved in the planning & development aspects of this county, every EDC citizen is impacted by some aspect of Sustainable Development. It is essential to recognize how your own ox is gored by weekly decisions made by the local, state and federal legislators. Nearly every week the BOS deals with DOT, Environmental & Parks issues. Parks & Rec, Sac-Placerville Transportation Corridor and Trails Advisory committees are integral to the decisions that are made at the BOS. Unless you attend these meetings in person, you’ll have no idea what actually transpires at these meetings as videos are not yet available. In fact, minutes from the April meetings aren’t even posted, and if they were, are intentionally so brief that they don’t tell you anything anyway. Call that transparency & accountability? Citizens, do you know where your tax dollars are being spent? Most do not because the devil is in the details usually buried (intentionally?) beneath thick reams of paper. This has been the subject of several meetings with Interim DOT Director Kim Kerr, and CAO Terri Daly specific to CIP projects in District #4. Both public servants on several occasions have promised answers to questions submitted in writing but have reneged on their commitments. Supervisor Briggs has remained arrogantly silent since a joint meeting held July 2009 in his office over related matters concerning his district. Unless you have the patience of Job, try filing a bureaucratic FOIA. If you watch the BOS meeting videos, you’ll find Jack Sweeney reveals more about the Hwy 49, Mt. Murphy, Bayne, and Bassi Road bridge projects comprising a huge chunk of the DOT Capitol Improvement Projects. The Hwy 49 bridge retrofit in Coloma alone is in excess of $17M and includes a bike trail, but good luck finding any relevant figures. The question remains: who is on the advisory committees, their associations, and potential conflicts of interest?