Wednesday, June 19, 2013
CALIFORNIA'S OLDEST NEWSPAPER - EST. 1851
Volume 162 · Issue 73 | 99¢

Travel Demand Model looks into the future

El Dorado County Supervisors insisted that their goal is to “make things easier” as they plan for future growth and development. Specifically, they were considering the county’s “Travel Demand Model,” which attempts to forecast residents’ driving patterns over the next 25 years. The model is required for ongoing implementation of the county’s General Plan.

Engineers with the El Dorado County Department of Transportation discussed and displayed a Roadway Network Map and Traffic Analysis Zone Map for the board recently. The project is being conducted by county staff and the Sacramento branch of Kimley-Horn and Associates consulting firm.

In order to plan rationally for the county’s future travel needs, the department and KHA needed to develop baseline data for which it used the year 2010 as the starting point. The Roadway Network data provide a “basis for estimating travel time between Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) and as a basis for traffic assignments,” according to DOT’s documentation.

That information further serves as a “tool to facilitate an understanding of how trips are distributed and as a tool for displaying the level of traffic congestion associated with different land-use scenarios.” The model is based upon projections stretching  out to the year 2035.

Potential land use is what drives the planning component issues of which traffic is a significant element. In engineering parlance, the TAZs “provide the basic unit for converting spatial area data into tabular data for use by the Travel Demand Model.”

Those data are used to “manage interactions between internal land uses and for channeling trip loading onto the model roadway network,” the documents explain. In simple terms, the model projects the amount of traffic expected to impact a given area, for example, if a subdivision of 200 homes is built in the neighborhood.

The TAZs also are used to gather  and “display information relating to land use, employment, population, socio-economic and other data.”

DOT senior civil engineer Claudia Wade and Natalie Porter gave a slide presentation describing the project’s plans and goals. The Roadway Network in part attempts to predict “how feeder roads impact our roads,” Wade said.

Feeder roads would be any roads that lead motorists in to or away from a specific area thereby causing some traffic impact on that area’s roads and streets. Traffic coming out of Folsom on Green Valley Road, thus could have a measurable impact on residential and commercial development on the north side of El Dorado Hills as well as in Cameron Park and the Rescue area, Wade explained.

Traffic Analysis Zones are based on a “gravity model,” Wade said. That is that drivers will use the “shortest and quickest way to get to where they’re going.”

As proposed, there will be 626 TAZs included in the model, and their function “should be understandable to the public,” she added. That concept resonated with supervisors who acknowledged that the material is highly technical because it is a piece of a much larger puzzle, that is the General Plan. And that plan includes a host of interrelated issues from traffic to housing to employment to aesthetics and areas of historical significance as well as government services.

Supervisor Jack Sweeney urged that the project needs to be presented so “the public can understand, in plain English. This is a wonderful technical document but the public is missing the point of what we’re trying to do here. I want the deliverable here, clearly defined.”

Sweeney also railed against the county’s policies that can require any applicant for permits to do a traffic study.

Supervisors Ron Briggs and Ray Nutting also took pokes at the complexity of the project and its methodology. Briggs had noted earlier that “our goal is to make things easier.”

“I’m trying to get this down to an understandable level,” Nutting said regarding how the study ascertains numbers of vehicle trips in all regions of the county. “So the closer you are to services, the more trips you take?” he asked.

“Yes,” co-presenter Porter responded.

More technical work remains to be done on the mapping project. Public comment has been gathered particularly from the county’s TIM Fee Working Group (Traffic Impact Mitigation) and the Engineering Subcommittee of the Economic Development Advisory Committee. And the board will hold a hearing to finalize the proposed maps on July 24.

Chris Daley

Chris Daley

Chris has written a weekly column for the Democrat for more than 20 years and has Master’s Degrees in Russian History, Psychology and Career Counseling. He has been a staff writer for a number of years and enjoys it because he "learns so much about so many things."

4 thoughts on “Travel Demand Model looks into the future

  1. Evelyn Veerkamp says:

    2010 CALIFORNIA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN GUIDELINES
    @ http://www.catc.ca.gov/programs/rtp/2010_RTP_Guidelines.pdf ********** For a very quick & unscientific overview of this 254 page pdf do separate searches on the words MAY and SHALL, briefly skimming random samples of each. And, bear in mind the word “Guidelines” in the document title.

  2. Evelyn Veerkamp says:

    UNDERSTANDING SB 375: REGIONAL PLANNING FOR TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING AND THE ENVIRONMENT @ http://www.ca-ilg.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/resources__Understanding_SB_375_Regional_Planning_Guide.pdf ********** “SB 375 specifically provides that cities and counties retain ultimate authority over local land use decisions.50 Cities and counties need not amend or update their general plans to conform to the land use patterns included in the regional transportation plan and the sustainable communities strategy. However, because the regional transportation plan, the regional housing needs allocation, and the sustainable communities strategy are based on a common set of land use assumptions, these regional plans offer a collective vision for the region that may influence how local general plans evolve over time.” (pg. 15)

  3. Evelyn Veerkamp says:

    In the immediately preceding comment the number “50″ appears as a footnote in the original document. However, its inclusion in my comment is confusing. I should have deleted it.

  4. Not in EDC!!! says:

    I find the timing peculiar that the Mtn. Demo waited 2 full weeks to post an article about the 6/26 BOS item #46 (Roadway & TAZ maps). What was supposed to be a 30 minute presentation turned into 90 minutes. Watch the video to get an accurate perspective of a very important element that is missing from this article, namely TRANSPARENCY & ACCOUNTABILITY. CAO & Interim DOT Director Kim Kerr have deliberately kept public in the dark and refuse to answer relevant questions. Silence is not golden; it can be fatal to EDCs economic future. Refer to Voice of Ione and the investigation into their ex-City Manager, our very own Kim Kerr: “UNPRECEDENTED two year grand jury investigation finds Kim Kerr and City Council responsible for financial woes” http://www.voiceinione.com/Comments/comments.htm

Leave a Reply

.

News

Hangtown Haven eyes move west

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: A1, 2 Comments | Gallery

 
Sept. prelim for Harris

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Kidney recipient tells bittersweet story

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: A1 | Gallery

 
Recorder performs marriage by proxy

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1 | Gallery

 
Miners’ trial pushed back

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A3, 1 Comment | Gallery

Watershed and Fire Safety Workshop

Press Release | From Page: A6

 
Lions, leopards and otters, oh my

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A7 | Gallery

.

Opinion

Take my word for it: Be the bigger man

By Patrick Ibarra | From Page: A4

 
New hook-up fees outrageous

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4

 
.

Letters

Paint Main Street

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

 
Summer Sunsational

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

A parable

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 7 Comments

 
Peabody Bobbity Boo

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Raggedy Ann and Andy

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

 
Camino area billboard

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 3 Comments

Nutting scandal

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 3 Comments

 
.

Sports

Taz Devils outpoint Sierra Sharks

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A8 | Gallery

 
Course no obstacle for Snyder twins

By Mike Bush | From Page: A8 | Gallery

.

Prospecting

The pageant is back

By Jessica Cyphers | From Page: B1 | Gallery

 
Wadsworth is Rose

By Democrat Staff | From Page: B1

At a glance: Summer is arriving

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2

 
HartSong Ranch provides a second chance

By Hartsong Ranch | From Page: B2

Master Food Preservers: On the measurement of summer produce

By Monique Wilber | From Page: B3 | Gallery

 
Grow For It! Peanut butter and jelly

By Barbara Schuchart | From Page: B4

Big sound wows fair audience

By Mike Roberts | From Page: B5 | Gallery

 
Country concert party at the Placer County Fair

By Placer County | From Page: B5

Plenty of summer fun at South Tahoe

By Tahoe South | From Page: B5

 
Academic Talent Search is on at Sac State

By California State Unversity, Sacramento | From Page: B6

.

Essentials

Crime Log: May 21-22

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

 
.

Obituaries

Florence Evalyn Sampson

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
Elizabeth Lynette (Lyn) Mizell

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Emerald Ralph Luther

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
.

Real Estate

.

Comics

Tundra

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Horoscope, Thursday, June 20, 2013

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Horoscope, Wednesday, June 19, 2013

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A10

TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Shoe

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Sudoku

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Rubes

By Contributor | From Page: A10

New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A10