Are Americans really ignorant about global warming?

By October 29, 2010

By James M. Taylor

Heatland Institute
Global warming alarmism reached a new level of desperation last week when activists at the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication (YPCCC) published a study claiming 52 percent of Americans get an F on their knowledge of basic global warming facts. Such a poor grade might be cause for concern—until one examines what YCCC considers basic global warming facts. Here’s a hint:  in the middle of the Inquisition, Galileo faced a relatively benign definition of scientific truth compared to what YPCCC claims.
YPCCC asked 2,030 U.S. adults to answer several questions about global warming. How is it that most get a failing grade regarding basic global warming facts? Here are some examples:
According to YPCCC, people who believe there is “a lot of disagreement among scientists” regarding global warming answered the question “incorrectly.”
People who believe global warming is “caused by both human activity and natural changes” answered the question “incorrectly.”
People who answered that the sun is one of the five most significant causes of global warming answered the question “incorrectly.”
People who identified nuclear power, which emits absolutely zero carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gas emissions, as one of the five most significant causes of global warming answered the question “correctly.”
People who believe “scientists’ computer models are too unreliable to predict the climate of the future” answered the question “incorrectly.”
People who believe “having at most 2 children per family” would reduce global warming answered the question “correctly.”
Rather than an indictment of Americans’ knowledge of basic global warming facts, the YPCCC study is powerful indictment of the opinion, speculation, and propaganda that we are told is “objective truth” in today’s politically motivated scientific debates. According to YPCCC, climate scientists at such prestigious institutions as Harvard, Princeton, MIT, NASA, and NOAA all would have received a failing grade on basic climate science. It is hard to imagine climate scientists at these prestigious institutions receiving F’s on basic climate science facts unless the asserted “facts” were actually opinion and speculation presented by activists on one side of the debate.
Lest one confuse YPCCC with the kind of objective scientific body that one would expect from an Ivy League university, one need only consider YPCCC’s self-description as “over 100 national leaders representing science, media, religion, politics, entertainment, education, business, environmentalism, and civil society” seeking “to develop an action plan to engage American society on climate change.” YPCCC’s self-described primary objective is “to diagnose why, in the face of ever stronger climate science, the United States had been slow to act and to recommend a set of initiatives to catalyze action.”
To their shame, the mainstream news media took no note of the agenda and blatant biases of YPCCC and its “study.” USA Today, Reuters, the Washington Post, and the New York Times are just a few of the media outlets that published articles parroting the YPCCC study. None of these articles mentioned YPCCC’s alarmist agenda and the absurdity of what YPCCC claims as scientific truths. Instead, Americans were treated to more articles telling them how idiotic and uninformed they are.
Regardless of where one stands on the global warming issue, truth and the public interest are best served by open and honest discussion and debate. Pretending that one’s own opinions are the unchallengeable truth runs counter to scientific inquiry and precludes the possibility of open and honest debate. It is an inquisition, not science.

Subscription Required

Thank you for reading the digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.

Current Subscribers
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.

Subscriber Verification

Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.

Call and Save! (530) 344-5000

If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to and start your online subscription



  • Recent Posts

  • Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

  • Special Publications »

    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service (updated 4/30/2015) and Privacy Policy (updated 4/7/2015).
    Copyright (c) 2015 McNaughton Newspapers, Inc., a family-owned local media company that proudly publishes the Daily Republic, Mountain Democrat, Davis Enterprise, Village Life and other community-driven publications.