Sometimes, you have to stick to your guns. Especially when you’re talking about spreading news, where sacrificing the integrity of your information makes you no less enlightening than propaganda.
Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
Kudos to Wikipedia, whose co-counder Jimmy Wales recently said he would rather have no Wikipedia in China than comply with any form of censorship. Speaking to the Wall Street Journal in Hong Kong, he said the Wikipedia company will always refuse to comply with government requests to restrict information, and that access to knowledge and education is a human right.
China forces users to only access the unencrypted version of the site, where politically sensitive topics are blocked. Keyword filtering has become a common practice there.
In December, China’s legislature required Internet access providers to collect data about users that links their online names to their real identities. When asked by the Wall Street Journal if he’d comply with the real-name registration system, Wales said, “Not for five seconds.”
Compromising the quality of information your production shares with the public is a big no-no, no matter how wide of an audience you’re trying to reach. At some point, organizations must stand up and stick to their guns, even if it means being banned from an entire country.
While China hasn’t banned Wikipedia altogether yet, it could happen if Wikipedia takes further action to ensure its full scope of articles are broadcast there. Web activists have asked Wikipedia to default to the encrypted version of the site, forcing China to make the decision over allowing full access to the site or banning it outright. If Wikipedia switched, China would be unable to filter or track user behavior on the site.
Unfortunately, Wales said the company currently does not have the technical ability to do that yet in China. We’re hoping it, and every other worldwide information company facing censorship in the country, figures it out soon. It may lead to their ban, but the integrity of each would remain rock solid, and that’s just as important.