The Federal Aviation Administration is standing in the way of progress and taking too long to write rules about things it should have minimal, if any, say over.
Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
Case No. 1 is aerial drones used by real estate photographers that don’t go any higher than 500 feet. Real estate photographers use balloons or mini-blimps that go up about 50-150 feet. That is little different than a hovering drone with a remote-controlled camera whose view can be seen by the operator. It’s not much different than flying a kite. In rural areas, which is uncontrolled air space, where’s the problem? In high-traffic areas like Los Angeles or the Bay Area the FAA should be able to come up with a maximum height similar to remote-controlled hobby aircraft and ban their use within so many miles of an airport.
The other commercial-type use that came in for a cease-and-desist order from the FAA was Lakemead Beer in Minnesota that apparently set up on the edge of a lake and delivered a 12-pack of beer to an ice fisherman’s shack at a low enough altitude to be “flying over the head of a curious onlooker.” The craft beer brewer is scoping out “drone ports around Minnesota lakes” in hopes the FAA will publish rules for small unmanned areal systems in a responsible time period.
Ice fishing drone ports? What a concept.
Case No. 2 of FAA overreach is its desire to regulate commercial space flight, such a Virgin Galactic. What’s the beef? Orbital debris. Yep, the FAA is worried about space junk. Try telling that to the Chinese and their frozen Moon vehicle. The FAA also wants to certify carrier planes that transport passenger rocket ships.
However, there is a 2004 law that called for minimal FAA regulation of the Virgin Galactic and a handful of other private projects aiming to take passengers into the upper reaches of the atmosphere. The FAA needs to back off. Let the passengers beware.