- Home
- News
- Opinion
- Letters
- Sports
- Prospecting
- Essentials
- Obituaries
- Real Estate
- Comics
- Gallery
- Classifieds
- Advertisers
- Coupons
- Contact Us
Share Article
720
336720336
If an excursion railroad can share the right of way with bicyclists and pedestrians between El Dorado and Shingle Springs what is so different about the remaining distance between Shingle Springs and Folsom that the same arrangement can’t apply?
Once again, the Board of Supervisors, on a 3-2 vote erred by denying a Folsom nonprofit association railroad from using the tracks. There is no reason the Placerville & Sacramento Valley Railroad can’t fix up the tracks and meet the El Dorado Western Railroad at Shingle Springs.
Trail advocates seem stuck on the belief that ripping up the rails and selling them for scrap will pay for the trail construction. Not even close, Class 1 trails with aggregate base — rather than railroad ballast —and asphalt, along with signage and portable potties cost far in excess of scrap steel, especially now with a worldwide recession leading to a glut of steel.
Furthermore, taking up the rails endangers the right of way. The lawyer who helped create the Milton Ranch subdivision in Shingle Springs confirmed that at a recent Taxpayers Association of El Dorado County meeting. Remove the rails and the property owners take over the easement. At the very least there will be 15 years of litigation.
Finally, attempting to dissolve the joint powers authority that owns the railroad right of way from Placerville to Rancho Cordova is just plain nutty. That’s a lot of right of way that can be used for utility purposes as well as rail and hiking-bicycling. The supervisor who helped write the JPA is pretty confident it’s not dissolvable by one fickle JPA member.
If the El Dorado Community Foundation can come up with a joint use agreement — as promised — between the trail advocates and the El Dorado railroad group, there is no reason this model can’t be used for the rest of the right of way, providing a trail connection to the American River Parkway and maybe eventually to South Lake Tahoe.
We continue to urge joint use. Bringing an excursion train into El Dorado County will be an economic boon for the county, with bus connections to Apple Hill and local wineries, especially those near the railroad.
The Mountain Democrat does not necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post. Read our full policy
1036-FrankDecember 07, 2012 - 2:52 pm
There is something going on when the same three stooges are doing the same thing yet again considering two of them are thankfully gone soon. I wonder if it was the JPA slap-down the BOS received or is it a developer involved in trying to stop the rails from being used for fear of bothering a future housing development in Latrobe, maybe AKT or another big player, or is it just spite for Knight being voted out. There is more to this vote then the public knows, that I am sure of.
EldoradoDecember 07, 2012 - 4:55 pm
When Southern Pacific tried to abandon the right of way in 1987, a lot of people volunteered their time and money to help the county fight it, after being told that the BOS was trying to keep the rails and the right of way for future rail use: commuter, tourist, etc. Now we are finding out that again we were lied to (big surprise...LOL). Get rid of these jerks...
SparkyDecember 10, 2012 - 8:02 am
Specifically, who is paying for the existing Class 1 trail maintenance? What about liability insurance? How much is budgeted for both? Sharing the easement would seemingly force the entities to share these costs. Private/public cost sharing is not completely uncommon and financially mutually beneficial. The excursion train money might end up siphoning those dollars right out of the county, though..