Wednesday, July 30, 2014

My turn: EPA’s new carbon standards — CO2 fix or another tax?

From page A4 | July 09, 2014 |

If you have an extra minute, take a look around you. How many people do you know react to facts with a psychodynamic response — an automatic, partly unconscious act of tuning out at the first hint of anything counter to their predisposed ideas? Or if they do choose to engage, it is through the filters of their prejudice, often formulating comments while not hearing a thing.

Sound familiar? Yet we have all been guilty of this to some degree; it is natural, for the more we learn about politics or environmental issues like global warming and how they interface, the more focused we become, the more we think we know … and the more tunnel-eyed we find ourselves. Listening is the other rubric in communication, then judgment.

So, here are the facts. EPA’s new carbon emission standards will absolutely raise everyone’s electric bill … and cost many more jobs. It’s a lucrative money-making assault by liberal government on fossil fuels, our main source of energy and electricity. And who has any idea what new rolling blackouts will look like? But rest assured, all fingers will point at industry. This significant tax, like the Affordable Care Act and other recent new taxes, will be spread out over the next few years to make it more palatable to voters. There’s barely an argument from any quarter on that, but will these costly new regulations (taxes) actually reduce worldwide CO2 emissions? The NIPCC (Non-governmental International Panel on Climate Change) say’s emphatically: No.

In fact, at the November 2013 “UN Conference of the Parties 19” (COP19) in Warsaw, Poland, the entire G-7 of developed nations, with one holdout, all declined further CO2 restrictions impacting their recovering economies. They even vowed to scrap the ones they agreed to in 2011. Tony Abbot, Australia’s new prime minister, just nixed their new carbon tax and scrubbed its Climate Commission. And Great Britain’s PM David Cameron said they will roll back green taxes that are driving people into the poor house over fuel prices. Even in Japan, the patriarch of the Kyoto Accords announced it would ax its promised 25 percent carbon reduction target.

And Canada, Russia and New Zealand? They already declared they would not adhere to any carbon reduction goals at the “Disaster in Doha,” another UN Assembly meeting in Qatar in October 2013, where the crumbling of climate change consensus began. Well, why would all these developed nations bail out on UN climate change goals when it’s now “crawling on top of us?” Do they know something the UN won’t admit to? Who exactly are these UN Agenda 21 characters that keep pushing the embellished science?

Meet “Mr. Climate Change,” the new spokesperson for the United Nations Agenda 21 crowd, the successor to ”Mr. Global Warming,” who was fired for not showing up. You see, Mr. Change can never fail us; he can’t ever be fired because he is always with us. Nothing is static in nature and therefore change is inevitable. And Mr. Change is more than a mere flag bearer; he’s the main support column for the entire UN Agenda 21 “Palace of Earth’s Salvation.”

Ah, but here the fairytale ends because without climate change, the rain-dancing UN warming phobes don’t have a leg to stand on. And without Agenda 21, these rabid one-worlders have no mantra, no mechanism to march forward on. So climate change is not buffoonery after all; it’s another calculated construct, another tentacle driving the insidious creep of socialism.

Yet all the developing nations love it. Even China, with six of the worst polluted cities in the world and the largest carbon polluter by far, because the “rich nations,” through substantial UN fees and taxes, are required to pay monies to these “poor” countries — including China. Hello?

Brazil even wants retroactive restitution for all their disasters caused by climate change. But it’s really more than just wealth re-distribution because we also agreed to forfeit information technology, agricultural and industrial technology, even proprietary assets, all for the United Nations’ Agenda 21. The one G-7 holdout at the COP19 Climate Change defection was … well, it was us.

Actually it was Mr. Obama who salvaged the meeting after all the developed countries walked out filling the exits. When the NIPCC finally dissected, analyzed and exposed the fraud of UN climate change, all the developed nations recognized the bamboozle, all but one that is. Even our own 111th Congress in July 2011 eventually voted no on capping GHG emissions, effectively killing the Cap and Trade Bill because it would devastate a struggling recovery.

Congress spoke, but Obama answered again with, “I have a phone and a pen.” So why does Obama and Gina McCarthy, EPA secretary, continue to march in lockstep with Agenda 21 and not with our Congress and other developed countries? Is it because this lucrative EPA carbon tax scheme has no foundation in fact without UN propaganda?

When Hans Christian Anderson coined the phrase, “the king has no clothes,” I’m certain he couldn’t possibly have known to what depths it would be taken. If it is something else, can someone please explain it with a ration of thought? But please, read the NIPCC report first; spare us the UN/EPA garbage. I’m listening, thanks.

Rod Kerr is retired with 30 years of service at the California Department of Food Agriculture and with the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.





District 2 candidate statements tell of goals

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1

Sand Fire nears containment: 66 structures destroyed

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Quarter-acre fire in Kelsey

By Rebecca Murphy | From Page: A3

Schedule for Highway 50 blasting closures

By News Release | From Page: A3

Tails wagging over dog park approval

By Julie Samrick | From Page: A3



My Turn: Privatization of public services

By Mark Belden | From Page: A4

Policy book

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4



District 2 supervisorial special election

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 4 Comments

GDPUD management report

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Piano replaced

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Comments sign-in policy

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 1 Comment

Save the Guinea Worm

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 1 Comment

Large bangs

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 2 Comments

Private property gets no respect

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 2 Comments



Ex-Bruin lends a helping hand

By Steven Shaff | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Sierra Sharks finish middle of the pack

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A8

Roundup: July 29, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A8

Taz pull through for SSL trophy

By Patty Pope | From Page: A8



Nuns discover a pleasant place

By Lexi Boeger | From Page: B1 | Gallery

Bargains can be found everywhere

By Democrat Staff | From Page: B2 | Gallery

At a glance: Game time

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2

Barbecue dinner to benefit Blue Star Moms

By Mount Aukum Winery | From Page: B2

Stagecoach story takes riders on a trip

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: B3

Help needed to make cool ties

By Sew 4 | From Page: B3

Stroke and osteoporosis screenings planned

By Life Line Screening | From Page: B3

Master Food Preservers: Tomato time

By Monique Wilber | From Page: B4

Gold Rush Days activities cancelled this year

By Sacramento Convention And Visitors Center | From Page: B4

Build an author platform at the Library

By El Dorado | From Page: B5

Sacramento area museums offer summer fun

By Sacramento Association Of Museums | From Page: B5



Weather stats 7-29-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2

Building permits 6/2-6/2014

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2Comments are off for this post

Crime Log: July 17

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2



Wallace Murrel Thomas

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Merlyn Wilbur Adams

By Contributor | From Page: A2


Real Estate




Women’s Health

Love the skin you’re in

By Noel Stack | From Page: WH4

Dump stress and improve your health, productivity

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: WH7Comments are off for this post

Women’s Health Expo

By Marshall Medical | From Page: WH8

Find the confidence you need to fight back

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: WH12

Our choices directly affect our health

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: WH14

They’re NOT your mother’s hearing devices!

By Marshall Medical | From Page: WH17