Wednesday, April 16, 2014
PLACERVILLE, CALIFORNIA
99 CENTS

My turn: Obama’s energy policy schizophrenia

By
From page A4 | March 14, 2012 | 9 Comments

Matthews Merrill

President Obama’s recent attempt to convince the country he is the most pro-energy president in decades reminds me of the Ralph Waldo Emerson observation that “a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”

If true, the president must have one of those big minds because he has never been constrained by consistency.

In his recent State of the Union address, Obama claimed more domestic oil and gas are being drilled than at any time in decades. The only problem with his boast is all of that expanded drilling is going on in spite of the president’s efforts to limit it.

As a candidate, Obama made it clear he wanted to transition the United States away from oil, coal and natural gas to clean energy sources, like solar, wind and biofuels. As president he has done his best to keep that promise.

His strategy is twofold: (1) hinder or stop development of traditional energy sources, (2) while pumping billions of taxpayer dollars to his green energy friends.

He has succeeded on both fronts — sort of.

There is a drilling explosion, thanks mostly to new drilling techniques such as “fracking.” But drilling is mostly being done on privately held land. The president and his traditional-energy skeptics have little control over those resources. So these developments are booming, creating jobs and helping swell local tax revenues.

Obama has also been successful in handing out billions of taxpayer dollars to green-energy projects. However, that effort has taken a hit due to a string of high-profile failures like Solyndra ($535 million loan guarantee), Beacon Power ($43 million loan guarantee), and, most recently, Ener1 (used $55 million of a $118 million government grant).

Now that Obama is in full campaign mode, he wants to confuse the record to convince Americans that he is leading the energy-production charge. But the facts speak for themselves.

For example, almost immediately upon taking office, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar began withdrawing tracts of public land that had already been approved for oil and gas leasing. Most of these tracts had undergone a thorough, seven-year-long environmental review.

Six days later Salazar put a six-month delay on an offshore-drilling program. Soon after, the Interior Department decided to prioritize solar-energy development, which had the practical impact of removing large swaths of federal lands from traditional energy exploration.

Frustrated with the administration’s stonewalling, the Institute for Energy Research released a statement in December 2009 that included the following stunning stats: “To date, the Obama Administration has offered 2,888,354 onshore acres for lease, of which 1,028,299 have actually been leased. The administration also rescinded or deferred 77,055 acres that were issued for lease in Utah in 2008. Accounting for this subtraction, fewer onshore acres were leased in 2009 than any other year on record.”

Are you detecting a pattern? There’s more, lots more.

In March 2010 the Obama administration announced it would delay an offshore drilling plan and only make available a fraction of the offshore land that had been previously agreed upon.

The Deepwater Horizon drilling rig that exploded in the Gulf on April 20, 2010, led to the biggest oil spill in history. So it was understandable, albeit economically damaging, when the administration responded with a moratorium on new drilling in the Gulf.

But a federal judge struck down the moratorium. So Salazar just issued another, newly worded moratorium — in essence, defying a federal judge. The administration eventually lifted the moratorium in October, but drilling applicants then began to notice that permits were being slow-walked through the approval process. By December, the offshore ban was largely reinstated.

By February 2011, a federal judge found the Department of Interior in contempt of court for its foot-dragging.

And, of course, Obama recently nixed the Keystone XL pipeline that would have carried millions of barrels of Canadian oil to Texas for refining.

So when the president claimed that he’s “opened millions of new acres for oil and gas exploration” and that he’s ordering his administration “to open more than 75 percent of our potential offshore oil and gas resources,” the public should be skeptical.

This is the same president who claimed health-insurance premiums would go down by $2,500 by the end of his first term. You’ll be lucky if they only go up $2,500.

Obama has done more to block traditional energy production than any president in history. Inconsistency may not trouble him, but it will voters.

Merrill Matthews is a resident scholar with the Institute for Policy Innovation in Dallas.

Merrill Matthews

LEAVE A COMMENT

Discussion | 9 comments

  • Rita MillsMarch 12, 2012 - 9:20 pm

    Yawn.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Jack MartinMarch 12, 2012 - 9:29 pm

    When I read and learned about how Obama won his first two political offices, I knew he would eventually make Bill Clinton look like a boy scout. His blatant double speak on energy exploration is actually rather predictable when you learn about his past. What scares me in this situation is the utter lack of coverage by mainstream media sources.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • gato pelonMarch 13, 2012 - 7:58 am

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.........

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Jack MartinMarch 13, 2012 - 9:27 am

    Just lovin' these cohesive responses from the intellectual Progressives. They make such a compelling case against the author's original points. Still, to their credit, they ARE keeping up the average perceived intelligence level. In fact, it reminds me of a joke: A student flunked out of University of Michigan and transferred to Ohio State, thus raising the cumulative GPA of both schools. Thank you, I'm here all week.....

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • gato pelonMarch 13, 2012 - 9:53 am

    It goes right along with the BS spin in the above article. You can spin it anyway you want it's still ZZZZZZZZZZZZ! DRILL BABY DRILL! I need not to say anymore.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • GeraldMarch 13, 2012 - 1:59 pm

    Here are the facts about oil production from 2003 to 2010 the latest numbers. Here are the annual totals, in barrels produced, going back to 2003: 2003: 2,073,453,000 2004: 1,983,302,000 2005: 1,890,106,000 2006: 1,862,259,000 2007: 1,848,450,000 2008: 1,811,817,000 2009: 1,956,596,000 2010: 2,011,856,000 As anyone with eyes can see oil production is up under Obama. It can't be denied. I don't like Obama and I won't vote for him but the truth is the truth. Obama is presiding over more domestic oil drilling than George W Bush was. So please explain how he is a fuzzy headed tree hugger who wants to destroy the oil industry. Even George W Bush said that when oil gets above $54 a barrel the oil companies don't need the $4,000,000,000,000 subside that they have carved out for themselves. Yet oil is over $100 a barrel and Obama has kept the drilling subsides in place. No matter what he says neither he nor anyone else is going to take on big oil.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Jack MartinMarch 14, 2012 - 1:59 pm

    Assuming that your numbers are valid (you didn't cite your source), it is curious how the "net' total production numbers are rising, given that they are indeed falling dramatically from the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) fields, thanks mostly to a de-facto moratorium on new drilling permits in the GOM. They are, in fact, down approximately 65% just in the last two years, per this report from the Natural Resources Committee of the US House of Representatives. http://naturalresources.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=228278 That same report also shows net imports are UP 5% in the same time period. We can agree about the removal of subsidies, however. How can you ever have a meaningful discussion about tax codes and rates so long as the tax code is riddled with exceptions? Get rid of them.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • gato pelonMarch 13, 2012 - 5:37 pm

    Could be because the big oil is shipping, piping sweet crud and refined gasoline to other markets to make bigger profits thus raise the price of fuel here. Could speculators have anything to do with it? Your description of President of the United States as, fuzzy headed tree hegger, say volumes about you!

    Reply | Report abusive comment
  • Jack MartinMarch 14, 2012 - 2:02 pm

    Can't believe I'm defending Gerald here, gato, but he didn't call Obama a fuzzy headed tree hugger. He was "parroting" an accusation by Progressives that we Conservatives are the ones who regard Obama as a fuzzy headed tree hugger. In that regard, he was correct because we do regard him as such. Not because he, in his core, believes in environmental issues and causes, but because simply that is the voting base that he wishes to appeal to.

    Reply | Report abusive comment
.

News

Greenwood School being restored

By Rebecca Murphy | From Page: A1 | Gallery

 
Cal Fire increasing staffing, hiring

By Cal Fire | From Page: B1

EID restricts watering days

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A1, 12 Comments

 
Lover’s Leap fall injures man

By Tahoe Tribune | From Page: A1

EDH Fire Dept. annexing Latrobe

By Noel Stack | From Page: A1, 7 Comments

 
Motorcycle fatality in Greenwood

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1

 
Tea Party meeting April 17

By Tea Party Patriots Of El Dorado Hills | From Page: A3, 48 Comments

 
Town Hall Meeting on Underage Drinking May 1

By El Dorado Hills Community Vision Coalition | From Page: A6

Floating body not a body

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A7

 
Old mill a goner

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A11, 18 Comments | Gallery

.

Letters

A great big thanks

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

 
Murder? Suicide?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 8 Comments

‘Drive Clean’

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 4 Comments

 
Middle class getting poorer?

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 52 Comments

Real estate lies

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 14 Comments

 
.

Sports

Outside with Charlie: Switch gear

By Charlie Ferris | From Page: A8

 
Ponderosa volleyball is a family affair

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Aussie team makes visit

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: A8

 
Griz have challenging day

By Mike Bush | From Page: A8 | Gallery

Roundup: April 15, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A9 | Gallery

 
.

Prospecting

At a glance: Take aim on fun

By Mimi Escabar | From Page: B2

 
Men to walk a mile in her shoes

By Center For Violence-Free Relationships | From Page: B2 | Gallery

Runners stampede for Sugarloaf scholarships

By El Dorado County Office of Education | From Page: B2 | Gallery

 
Team works to fight disease

By Placerville Kiwanis | From Page: B3

 
COOL School is accepting applications

By Rescue Union | From Page: B4

Band of Miwoks fund mission

By Shingle Springs Band Of Miwok Indians | From Page: B12

 
.

Essentials

Crime Log: March 25-27

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

 
Weather stats 4-15-14

By Michael Raffety | From Page: A2

.

Obituaries

Numa Edward “Ed” Roberts

By Contributor | From Page: A2

 
Ronald Russell Rohrer

By Contributor | From Page: A2, 2 Comments

.

Real Estate

.

Comics

Flying McCoys

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Speed Bump

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Working It Out

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Shoe

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Rubes

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
New York Times Crossword

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Tundra

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
Horoscope, Thursday, April 17, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Horoscope, Wednesday, April 16, 2014

By Contributor | From Page: A10

 
TV Listings

By Contributor | From Page: A10

Sudoku

By Contributor | From Page: A10