Monday, September 22, 2014

The weekly Daley: What is, and what is not a WMD?

From page A6 | May 03, 2013 |

I’ve been uncomfortable hearing the media refer to the Boston Marathon bombs as weapons of mass destruction. Now:

Subscription Required

Thank you for reading the digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.

Current Subscribers
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.

Subscriber Verification

Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.

Call and Save! (530) 344-5000

If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to and start your online subscription


Whether that designation carries some kind of additional criminal penalty, I’m not sure, but I wouldn’t be surprised. There was considerable destruction, but did it rise to the level of “mass destruction?” I don’t think so. Having grown up under a nearly continuous threat of atomic bombs and resulting nuclear annihilation, I have a hard time reconciling that level of cataclysmic destruction to that of backpack bombs.

Weapons of mass destruction were nuclear bombs and radioactive stuff, chemical agents like poisons and gas, and biological things like small pox or anthrax weaponized for widespread death and horror. WMDs were things that continued to create death and damage, especially to humans, long after the initial explosion or dispersal of the materials. The FBI’s Website lists these four categories as the official weapons of mass destruction, although evidently there has been significant differences in interpretation over the years. Apparently, there are both political definitions and technical definitions and fairly indiscriminate use of the former.

In the run-up to the Iraq war, no one anywhere considered grenades or homemade bombs or standard artillery shells as the WMDs we could not allow Saddam Hussein to possess. U.S. and allied forces didn’t wear HazMat suits to protect themselves from regular bullets or RPGs. They put them on to counteract assaults by chemical and biological weapons, i.e. weapons of mass destruction. The threat to the world from Iran and North Korea is not based on those rascals having too many AK-47s and flamethrowers. It’s based on their efforts to develop real WMDs in the form of nuclear missiles.

A few clicks online turn up a wealth of discussions about what is and what is not a WMD. Going back to 1948, the United Nations sought a definition and got one from its “Commission for Conventional Armaments.” By a process of elimination, that commission determined, in effect, that it had jurisdiction over “all armaments and armed forces, except atomic weapons and weapons of mass destruction.”

Furthermore,  “… weapons of mass destruction should be defined to include atomic explosive weapons, radioactive material weapons, lethal chemical and biological weapons, and any weapons developed in the future which have characteristics comparable in destructive effect to those of the atomic bomb or other weapons mentioned above.”

That seems a sensible and realistic definition. That the FBI uses basically the same definition as the UN’s should prompt some concern. After all, the FBI is a significant branch of the U.S. Department of Justice. They should be in agreement about what is or is not a WMD. Otherwise, I would think there could be some  unintended “taint” on evidence as it works its way from the FBI labs to the courtroom.

And there’s a darker concern here as well. “Hyping” explosive devices made with fireworks powder, BBs and Vaseline as WMDs seems a pretty cynical designation on the part of the Justice Department. In that context, it gives the agency a much bigger hammer than it should need or have. It gives me a sense of being manipulated into the parade wherein the “Emperor’s New Clothes” were displayed to a fearful and gullible public. That is, “don’t believe what you see and know; believe what we tell you to believe.”

The Encyclopedia Britannica defines a WMD as a “weapon with the capacity to inflict death and destruction on such a massive scale and so indiscriminately that its very presence in the hands of a hostile power can be considered a grievous threat.” Related discussions note that the threat applies to humans, other life forms, man-made structures, natural things such as mountains or rivers and to the biosphere.

“Hey, Emperor, love the new look.”

Chris Daley is a staff writer and columnist for the Mountain Democrat. His column appears each Friday. 







Signs subject to removal

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1

Georgetown smoky but grateful

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1 | Gallery

King Fire structural damage confirmed

By Dawn Hodson | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Accused arsonist pleads not guilty

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A1 | Gallery

Community shows appreciation to firefighters

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: A3 | Gallery

County releases wildfire smoke advisory

By News Release | From Page: A3

Sept. 23 is National Voter Registration Day

By News Release | From Page: A9



Discouraging fire

By Mountain Democrat | From Page: A4

The balancing act: Is it incompetence or arrogance?

By Larry Weitzman | From Page: A4

Home country: The backhoe pro

By Slim Randles | From Page: A4



Beautiful flock

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Militarized police

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5, 1 Comment

Thank you Rotary Club of Placerville

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Development not new

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Earth is dying

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5

Mather noise

By Letters to the Editor | From Page: A5



Sports Scene: Sept. 21, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6

Oak Ridge loses to Reed

By Scott Warden | From Page: A6

Golden Sierra suffers first loss

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A6

Schedule: Sept. 22-27, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A6

Union Mine gets victory in home opener

By Mark Devaughn | From Page: A6 | Gallery

Lady Trojans tame Woodcreek netters

By Mike Bush | From Page: A6 | Gallery

El Dorado stays perfect after 42-0 win

By Mike Bush | From Page: A6

Roundup: Sept. 20, 2014

By Democrat Staff | From Page: A7 | Gallery

Ponderosa falls to Timberwolves

By Brandon Anicich | From Page: A7

D’backs stumble against Bear River

By Jerry Heinzer | From Page: A7



Foothill dining: Avacados are good

By Donna Brown | From Page: B2

Montessori students win at Nature Bowl

By Special to the Democrat | From Page: B2

Off to España

By Noel Stack | From Page: B2

Local students honored with scholarships

By Calrta Rta | From Page: B2

As we were: All shook up

By Ken Deibert | From Page: B3

Amador Fair auction sets records

By Amador County Fair | From Page: B3

Workshop to help with communication

By News Release | From Page: B4

Find exceptional names and more

By Wendy Schultz | From Page: B4

Arbor Day Foundation offers cypress trees

By Arbor Day | From Page: B4

Plans to light Pink the Night

By Marshall Foundation For Community Health | From Page: B10



Crime Log: Sept. 6-8

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2

DUI Log: Sept. 11-14

By Cole Mayer | From Page: A2



Robert E. Wentland

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Robert “Bob” Lee Rigler

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Gloria A. Williams

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Dorothy B. Rhoades

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Robert “Bob” Sherwood

By Contributor | From Page: A2

James R. “Jim” Owens funeral notice

By Contributor | From Page: A2

Carlice Williams death notice

By Contributor | From Page: A2


Real Estate