Thank you for reading the MtDemocrat.com digital edition. In order to continue reading this story please choose one of the following options.
If you are a current subscriber and wish to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com, please select the Subscriber Verification option below. If you already have a login, please select "Login" at the lower right corner of this box.
Special Introductory Offer
For a short time we will be offering a discount to those who call us in order to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your print subscription. Our customer support team will be standing by Monday through Friday, 8am to 5pm to assist you.
If you are not a current subscriber and wish not to take advantage of our special introductory offer, please select the $12 monthly option below to obtain access to MtDemocrat.com and start your online subscription
I was pondering whom to vote for in the upcoming special election for state Assembly District 4. Back to basics … Federalist Paper No. 52 describes the House of Representatives, and the lower house of a bicameral legislature in general. It says:
“As it is essential to liberty that the government in general should have a common interest with the people, so it is particularly essential that the branch of it under consideration should have an immediate dependence on, and an intimate sympathy with, the people.”
I think we are drifting far away from that goal. Representatives are immediately dependent on money and party. They need us only to pick between two party favorites and a cast of also-rans. They have intimate sympathy with their party and donors, but they don’t even know what the majority of their constituents want.
I plan to vote for a candidate with the best plan for representation as described by our founders. In today’s “plugged in” world, there is no reason for we the people to accept the status quo. Wouldn’t it be fun if just one candidate stepped up to the challenge?